I really don't associate vampires with animals at all, other than the sound effects used and the fact that they are animalistic in nature. Humans are animalistic in nature if stripped of all society's norms. That's the representation I took, not that they were big dogs or cats. I mean, what's interesting about supernatural animals? I find more interest in the corruption of human ideals and norms that vampires represent for me.
Perhaps the vampires are a metaphor for "cats are evil. They hide behind the fur and pretend to be cute but this is what they would be like if they were human."
😛
The vampires on Buffy are very felinesque though in their behaviour, enough so to suggest that they could be giant cats with human intelligence.
I agree, but I find it interesting how both Darla and Dru seem to shun the spotlight and prefer to let their men take charge. They may have the real power, but they mostly control their men with a soft hand. It is Angelus that is famous and it is Spike that is the slayer-killer.
When Darla and Drusilla team up, they do well at first, but they quickly become a bit lost. They would have prefered to have Angel and Spike there to do the work for them.
This is kind of what I mean by "patriarchal". Female vampires aren't powerless, they know how to manipulate their male counterparts, but the males have to be seen as the leaders. Darla could easily lead The Whirlwind, yet Angelus is the one considered the leader. This could just be a clever ploy on Darla's part, let Angelus suffer the pitfalls of leadership whilst she gets the benefits of pulling his strings, or it could just be the male leaders are more respected by others outside of the group rather than female leaders.
That doesn't necessarily reflect the views of those inside a group who would follow a leader regardless of whether they be male or female, but from the perspective of rival groups, a male leader is more likely to see off a territorial challenge than a female one.
Sunday is the outright leader of her group, yet if someone like Mort (the big one from Harmony's group) were to challenge her for control of the group one on one, would Sunday be able to defend her position? Mort is bigger, stronger, though possibly not as quick, but he would have the size and strength advantage over Sunday. If Mort challenged uninjured Season 2 Spike, there's a good chance he'd be able to defend his position or at least put up a good fight because he and Mort are more evenly matched on the strength side. Mort's actor is 6'4", JM is 5'9" whilst Sunday's actress is 5'7".
She calls the shots about who she has sex with and can have several partners at a time. When she punishes Spike with unfaithfulness, she is exercising her right to do whatever she wants.
Drusilla actually doesn't sleep with that many people. As far as we know, she's only slept with 3 (maybe 4) people: Spike, Angelus and a threesome with Darla and the Immortal.
The reason why her unfaithfulness (post-Sunnydale) is so hurtful to Spike is because it isn't the norm. If Dru was sleeping around left, right and centre and constantly having "several partners at a time", then why would Spike be bothered that she was just carrying that on? The only way it would hurt him is if she was deliberately going out of her way to flirt with others when she hasn't done so before.
The Angelus situation is complicated for various reasons, but I don't think it's just a simple case of Dru being "a big ho".
A patriarchy would have been more like Tara's family with the women held in check by threats of violence.
That's a misogynistic patriarchy rather than a normal one. Tara's family were abusive and wanted her "in her place", male vampires are just publicly in charge over the females (though the females may be in charge behind the scenes).