Kana
Soulless human
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2007
- Messages
- 1,305
I was wondering about the Billy's power and how exactly it affects men.
Lilah seems to think Billy brings out an already innate 'primordial misogyny' in men. Angel seems to believe this theory and claims that he was immune to the effects of his touch because he lost the hatred it was suppose bring out.
Wesley worries that Billy brought something to the surface that was deep inside of him.
Fred argues that it was something that was done to Wes rather than the something inside of him. Her truth lies in the fact that Wesley doesn't want to kill her when the effects wore off.
So who is responsible? In the Angelverse, do all men have a latent misogynistic tendencies?
I personally believe that overall it was something done to them. Billy transfered his own hatred of women onto the men he touched.
Most of the men would rationalize the feelings they were having (of course doubting the concept of a magically induced hatred of women) and search for their own psyche to make sense of it. This is what I believed happened to Wesley. He never wanted to hurt Fred but she makes him nervous, and awkward. Unwittingly she brings out his insecurities, as do most women. His need to reassert control, was something, ironically forced upon him, yet his frustrations were most likely real and so closely linked to the feelings Billy transferred, it was difficult for him not to believe that this hatred was a part of him.
I also don't believe so readily in Angel's claim to virtue either. While I don't believe that misogyny is something inherent in all men, I believe all of us at one point or another are given to the frustrations and insecurities that come from encountering sex to which we are attracted. Not only that we do at times succumb to petty disputes that arise from past bitterness and memories of failed love. I don't believe Angel is above this and we only have to look at his interactions with others but this doesn't necessarily equate to this so called latent misogyny.
This really follows on to the idea that I don't really believe in a singular trait of misogyny that exists without context and mood. It is often linked with formed attitudes or control issues, or a myriad of complex emotions such as inadequacy, sexual frustions etc and the rage that may arise from these.
It is our choice how we deal with these emotions and that's what makes us who and what we are.
Considering Angel has these feelings, I'd say simply that he was immune because he was a vampire.
Could be completely wrong but what do you guys think? Something in them, or something that was done to them?
I actually believe that
Lilah seems to think Billy brings out an already innate 'primordial misogyny' in men. Angel seems to believe this theory and claims that he was immune to the effects of his touch because he lost the hatred it was suppose bring out.
Wesley worries that Billy brought something to the surface that was deep inside of him.
Fred argues that it was something that was done to Wes rather than the something inside of him. Her truth lies in the fact that Wesley doesn't want to kill her when the effects wore off.
So who is responsible? In the Angelverse, do all men have a latent misogynistic tendencies?
I personally believe that overall it was something done to them. Billy transfered his own hatred of women onto the men he touched.
Most of the men would rationalize the feelings they were having (of course doubting the concept of a magically induced hatred of women) and search for their own psyche to make sense of it. This is what I believed happened to Wesley. He never wanted to hurt Fred but she makes him nervous, and awkward. Unwittingly she brings out his insecurities, as do most women. His need to reassert control, was something, ironically forced upon him, yet his frustrations were most likely real and so closely linked to the feelings Billy transferred, it was difficult for him not to believe that this hatred was a part of him.
I also don't believe so readily in Angel's claim to virtue either. While I don't believe that misogyny is something inherent in all men, I believe all of us at one point or another are given to the frustrations and insecurities that come from encountering sex to which we are attracted. Not only that we do at times succumb to petty disputes that arise from past bitterness and memories of failed love. I don't believe Angel is above this and we only have to look at his interactions with others but this doesn't necessarily equate to this so called latent misogyny.
This really follows on to the idea that I don't really believe in a singular trait of misogyny that exists without context and mood. It is often linked with formed attitudes or control issues, or a myriad of complex emotions such as inadequacy, sexual frustions etc and the rage that may arise from these.
It is our choice how we deal with these emotions and that's what makes us who and what we are.
Considering Angel has these feelings, I'd say simply that he was immune because he was a vampire.
Could be completely wrong but what do you guys think? Something in them, or something that was done to them?
I actually believe that