Brand new Scrabble coming soon

We only have your word on that. ๐Ÿ˜„

gf1UPx9.gif
"Never institutionalised" and "Does not need to be institutionalised" are not the same thing...

๐Ÿ˜€
 
I surprised that Gen Z'ers even know how to tie their own shoelaces.......oh wait, maybe they don't. Have you seen the new Skechers "slip-in's" commercial? Humm?
And older folks get slip-ons so they don't have to bend over. Does anyone think of the poor shoelace factory workers and the hungry mouths at home?
giphy.gif
 
Mattel has done some research and found that younger, Gen Z people don't like the "competitive nature" of the game. So the new version will be "easier" and "more inclusive."

"The makers of Scrabble found that younger people, Gen Z people, donโ€™t quite like the competitive nature of Scrabble. They want a game where you can simply enjoy language, words, being together and having fun creating words."

The new version of the game "speaks to a trend in younger people who want to avoid competitive games and sense of losing."

Sounds like pretty lousy research to me. Have you seen how competitive online shooters are? Or sports? In what world do they think people, of any age, don't like competition in games?

Such an odd change. Of all the games one could play, Scrabble would never have topped my list of those that are "too competitive." Oh no, slow down there, Grandma. No need to unleash your triple point exotic vocabulary on me. It's only a game! We might lose our friendship over crosswords, next!

If any board game is culpable of starting family feuds (pun intended), it's probably Monopoly.

More than likely this is marketing speak to dress up a completely banal change that nobody would care about. Companies love to target their product to whichever generation happens to be in their teens/20s right now. Invent a justification for why you speak to them.
Post automatically merged:

First off, thanks for the correction! I don't think I recall reading this info in all my years (or I'd forgotten about it), so thanks!

Guess we can blame the Olympics for needing to provide everyone with a medal (or participation medal, more accurately) so everyone feels like a winner! Even in Scrabble. ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‰

To be fair, if you're literally competing in the Olympics, even making it that far is worthy of laurels.
 
Last edited:
Oh no, slow down there, Grandma. No need to unleash your triple point exotic vocabulary on me.
But I think that is it exactly. I am reminded of that scene in Sopranos where Meadow and Jackie Jr are playing Scrabble and he's making three-letter words. Competitive is just the code word for hard, hence following it up with words like easy and inclusive. That's why Words with Friends works, because it's designed that smaller words can still have a large value whereas with Scrabble the larger the word, generally, the bigger the value. Words with Friends is considered quick and easy to play whereas Scrabble is something that's thought of as harder and longer to play.
 
Ah yes, I remember those hard-arse competitive Scrabble-players from back in the day, terrifying people with their random verbosity and getting into dangerous 'street scrabble' competitions that left so many hospitalized.


I agree with @Spanky that this is just code for hard so they cop-out and say 'inclusive';
'please play scrabble, pretty please, it's super-easy, you don't have to know hard words or nothin'; Mattel probably.


If people don't want competitive board-games then they should try many of the awesome TTRPG's out there. Us role-players like to think that round a gaming table rolling dice there are no winners...only a whole bunch of losers.
 
But I think that is it exactly. I am reminded of that scene in Sopranos where Meadow and Jackie Jr are playing Scrabble and he's making three-letter words. Competitive is just the code word for hard, hence following it up with words like easy and inclusive. That's why Words with Friends works, because it's designed that smaller words can still have a large value whereas with Scrabble the larger the word, generally, the bigger the value. Words with Friends is considered quick and easy to play whereas Scrabble is something that's thought of as harder and longer to play.

I was being sarcastic.
 
Skanky Vamp
Skanky Vamp
I know
If any board game is culpable of starting family feuds (pun intended), it's probably Monopoly.
Haha my experience of Monopoly was always the opposite. Everybody starts off excited to play and as it drags on and on everybody gets bored and it just peters out !

:: cough:: ohio public school education ::cough::
Is Ohio really as bad as everyone says?
I have known a few Americans who make jokes about Ohio and there are loads of memes about how boring, racist, polluted etc it is

Still it did produce The Breeders and The Isley Brothers so not all bad
 
Haha my experience of Monopoly was always the opposite. Everybody starts off excited to play and as it drags on and on everybody gets bored and it just peters out !


Is Ohio really as bad as everyone says?
I have known a few Americans who make jokes about Ohio and there are loads of memes about how boring, racist, polluted etc it is

Still it did produce The Breeders and The Isley Brothers so not all bad

You may not have been around when the Cuyahoga river caught fire and burned down to the waterline.

The Kent State shootings by the National Guard happened there. I used to work with a guy who was there for both events.
 
Back
Top Bottom