Kana
Soulless human
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2007
- Messages
- 1,305
I don't really think killing humans is okay. Just playing devil's advocate really. But when human blood is their natural food source, it is hard to judge it too harshly. I mean, they can live off of rats obviously but I could live without chicken too. lol
I'm not actually saying it's inherently wrong but it's difficult to compare. Vampires although they kill their prey without remorse, they still have a complicated relationship with them. The way Spike and Harmony for example, interacted with humans is somewhat different than the way you'd interact with a chicken. If the chicken started expressing it's fear and started communicating that fear to you. If it began to think it's future dreams will cease to come into fruition, because you were going to end it's life. The problem is vampires are made from the raw materials of human beings.
However I conclude that because of the nature of most of the vampires we've seen, vampires must be judged differently. It seems if you take a reasonable human being let's say a sensitive minor poet who seems to abhor violence and prefers only to create 'things of beauty' and turn him into vampire, he could become one of the most violent creatures the world has seen. A creature that doesn't only kill for food but also for sport and on occasion simply random fits of rage. Despite his retention of his ability to love, he still had a history of violence that apparently rivals even Angelus. Considering Liam wasn't a sociopath when he was human ( I always hate the arguments that people think Angelus was the worst vampire because Liam was a jerk. I mean he was a player, but he wasn't a psycho.), it makes sense that vampire shouldn't be judged by human moral standards.
As for what that means for the ep and Spike's relationship with Buffy...? Well the jury remains out on this one.