"Ding dong the bitch is dead"

Well, it's quite clear she doesn't rely on logic 🙂



Just because you are right by dumb luck, particularly the First being so dumb to live, you do not get any points, at all. She played with people's lives, and that is never okay, no matter what the outcome is- the time from start to the 'end' is full of anxiety and fear- and a part of that, does have to do with Buffy's recklessness with Spike, It all turned out for the good isn't even an argument, at all. It's a mockery.

I agree, Buffy takes chances with other people's lives, and has done it almost from Season 1, Episode 1. The most blatant example would have to be her blind stubbornness in refusing to in any way consider killing Dawn before the ritual began that would open the gates of hell. In doing so, she risked the entire world and every living thing on it to protect the life of a being she felt love and a relationship for, despite knowing that Dawn was, in reality, simply a glowing ball of green energy.

And I also agree that one day her luck will run out, and a relatively small mistake, like refusing to stake Spike in Season 5, or Angel in either Season 2 or Season 5, will, indeed result in a major disaster for herself and possibly destruction of the world as we know it. As much as I like Spike as a character, staking him as soon as he began killing again would have seemed to be the right decision, and several people close to her, including Spike himself, told her so.

But, as we both have observed, Buffy is a Slayer, not a Vulcan, so logic isn't always the strongest guiding force in her thinking. But, until that day arrives, when Buffy's gut feeling proves to be her downfall, may she, and all the other occpants of the Buffyverse, live long and prosper.
 
Buffy Summers
Buffy Summers
lol 'Buffy is a Slayer not a Vulcan' :D
That was the only time in the WHOLE ENTIRE SERIES that I hated a character more than Dawn.
Whether she said 'bitch' or 'witch', same message either way. I had really wished that she would die in the finale just for her attitude in that who sequence. For some reason, she seemed to be against Buffy more than anyone, including Faith (Who started the disagreement), Kennedy (Who started the rebellion), Dawn (Who was the one who offically kicked her out) Giles, or Anya (Who had very strong opinions about it).
 
The Potentials were never warm towards Buffy, because they had no reason to be. She was their Watcher's Council, essentially, and, IMO, she treated them terribly given her own, early season, insistence on acting as a human with her own thoughts, rather than a soldier following orders. She may well have cared for the Potentials deep down, and taken their deaths hard, though I wouldn't say that the show actually implies that, beyond Xander's speech. But she certainly doesn't show them. She treats them like soldiers, she talks about a girl who commits suicide (who was probably friends with some of them) as weak, she keeps a vampire who is known to be killing people in the house with them. I'm aware that they were staying at her house, and that she, and the Scoobies, were acting as their protection, to an extent, though they are expected to train, and taken into dangerous situations, which they were in no way prepared for, and neither was Buffy. And then she proposed doing exactly the same thing again.

I'm sure there are some Potentials who shut up and put up (and faded into the background as a result) because they were grateful to Buffy, or because they were scared, or because they thought they wouldn't be listened to if they complained. And the ones who do complain are labelled as brats, or ungrateful bitches, which all seems a little unfair. With the attitude that Buffy shows to the Potentials, it would have been a bit weird if any of them felt particularly warm towards her.

I mean, I think Buffy needed calling out on her attitude in Season 7, and calling out hard. I actually thought Empty Places was needed. But even if you don't agree, I would say that the Potentials should bear the least of your anger. Xander, Willow, Anya, etc. have all disagreed with Buffy before, but they are also her friends- to an extent. They have cared for each other. They have far more reason to trust Buffy's dumb planning than the Potentials, who have basically no reason whatsoever.

Hence the differing reaction between the Scoobies- sadness, guilt, etc.- and the Potentials like Rona, who are probably, not entirely unreasonably, glad that she is gone, and not that sad because they were never close to Buffy.
 
I
itssmiletime
Well said.
EVIL UU
EVIL UU
[No message]
I'll say it again. Just because Buffy gave up her life, doesn't mean that the world owes her a living or anything.

Not even respect? That's all we're suggesting she is owed. I think it's a very little thing to expect a self-sacrificing human being to be treated with respect in her own home, which Rona did *not* do in the *way* she voiced her opinion.

I find it deeply fallacious when people bring up previous events, because well, I can just bring up Buffy's slut-shaming of Dawn in Him, her physical assault of her in No Place Like Home and her neglect in S6.

But the Buffyverse is all about past events and how they continue to affect our lives. As for the "physical assault", she thought Dawn was a *demon*. It's easily excusable. And if I saw a teenager girl dancing inappropriately and dressed to barely cover her body in public I and most people would have a problem with it. She's underage. Buffy is her parental figure. She's in charge and that means being aware of how something like this could negatively affect Dawn and putting a stop to it.

As for the neglect: that I agree with; but then no one, Dawn included, acted well in season six so I don't hold Buffy to any different standard there than the other characters.

I do want to add that though you and I deeply disagree you explain yourself really well which is always fun in a debate.
 
Not even respect? That's all we're suggesting she is owed. I think it's a very little thing to expect a self-sacrificing human being to be treated with respect in her own home, which Rona did *not* do in the *way* she voiced her opinion.

I don't think Buffy saving the world meant she was due respect, especially in the context of them sitting around thinking they'd do it better had they been the superpowered ones. That said, Buffy did deserve respect because it was her team.

In her shoes, I would have given Rona (and any other Potentials who wouldn't follow Buffy) the options of jumping to Angel's team or leaving altogether.

Considering the Jasmine factor that the Scoobies didn't know about, that may have been a bad call. But from their perspective:
1.) Angel's team could easily defend against the Bringers.
2.) Wesley is the world's expert on slayers outside of Giles & Robin.

So the opposition group would have been both relatively safe, and able to receive the appropriate training.

There's also the fact that Angel's team has an excellent track record of training non-powered humans into competent fighters, where Buffy never bothered to train Xander to even defend himself in his seven years of constant danger.

Buffy's team would've been stronger without the grumblers, and Angel's team would've benefited from humans with above-average inclinations towards fighting--heck by Fred's last human appearance she was proficient in combat, imagine what they could do with someone mystically chosen to be a potential slayer.
 
From a viewers perspective I just never warmed to the potentials. They seemed to range from anonymous to annoying and obnoxious and I never really felt like we got to see any good qualities from them. Despite the amount of screen time some of them received I never really saw them as much more than the 1 episode victims killed by various monsters of the week.

Taking a step into the show and looking at it from their perspective and their situation sucked. Hunted down by something they didn't understand for reasons they didn't understand either. They didn't have many good options. Crucially though they did have options. We see at the end of the series that plenty of potentials had survived on their own.

Which leads me to the point about Rona's line here. She chose to put herself into Buffy's protection and stay there. It was her decision that this was the best option available to her. She could have hid, tried police protection or went looking for help elsewhere (Angel or someone similar). There's no contract here. Buffy has no obligation to look after her, she does it out of the goodness of her heart the best she can. Rona does not owe Buffy friendship, she doesn't have to like her or agree with her, she doesn't even have to respect the fact that the only reason she's alive is because of Buffy's previous sacrifices. However she does have to respect the fact that she is receiving free accommodation and protection from Buffy. She's not a prisoner in that house, she can walk and try her luck elsewhere at any time.

I think it's a disgraceful line. To have the cheek to roll into someones home uninvited, take the free housing and let them fight on your behalf and for your protection and then bad mouth them afterwards is staggering.
 
Blaze
Blaze
[No message]
A
Amanda108
Perfectly said.
There's also the fact that Angel's team has an excellent track record of training non-powered humans into competent fighters, where Buffy never bothered to train Xander to even defend himself in his seven years of constant danger.

The fact that Angel and his team, regardless of the network stuff, was never even mentioned either means Buffy and the Scoobies are incompetent or unbelievably responsible.

Which leads me to the point about Rona's line here. She chose to put herself into Buffy's protection and stay there. It was her decision that this was the best option available to her. She could have hid, tried police protection or went looking for help elsewhere (Angel or someone similar). There's no contract here. Buffy has no obligation to look after her, she does it out of the goodness of her heart the best she can. Rona does not owe Buffy friendship, she doesn't have to like her or agree with her, she doesn't even have to respect the fact that the only reason she's alive is because of Buffy's previous sacrifices. However she does have to respect the fact that she is receiving free accommodation and protection from Buffy. She's not a prisoner in that house, she can walk and try her luck elsewhere at any time.

I think it's a disgraceful line. To have the cheek to roll into someones home uninvited, take the free housing and let them fight on your behalf and for your protection and then bad mouth them afterwards is staggering.

You know, this is a really good point.
 
The fact that Angel and his team, regardless of the network stuff, was never even mentioned either means Buffy and the Scoobies are incompetent or unbelievably responsible.
In fairness to them, Willow briefed Angel's team on the situation when she visited LA.

The greatest stupidity was probably on Angel Investigation's part, which Willow actually pointed out to them on screen--if you're tampering with Angel's soul, why on Earth wouldn't Willow be your first call?
 
I believe Rona said witch but by the way she said it and her face, it felt more like 'bitch'.
Did I hate the line? ABSOLUTELY.
Rona was a whiny, ungrateful, undeserving, hateful... well, bitch 😛
I don't agree about a lot of things that have been said in this topic about Buffy's value as a leader. I think in a war it's the result that makes the value, and she won.
 
[MENTION=12236]itssmiletime[/MENTION]
Well, yeah people make bad decisions, but when your bad decisions lead to people being killed, that’s when I have a problem. Also… I’ll say it again. Just because Buffy gave up her life, doesn’t mean that the world owes her a living or anything. I find it deeply fallacious when people bring up previous events, because well, I can just bring up Buffy’s slut-shaming of Dawn in Him, her physical assault of her in No Place Like Home and her neglect in S6.

Who in the Verse hasn't made a bad decision that caused someone to die? Xander in OMWF, Willow killing Warren. Neither of them really got any grief for what they did, because of what? They didn't kill anyone they personally knew or cared about? Also its kind of crazy to say the world doesn't owe Buffy anything, she saved the world numerous times because it was her job and didn't ask anything in return out of principle, but that doesn't mean her world didn't owe her anything. I was making the point that Dawn especially owed her, since Buffy specifically gave up her own life to spare Dawns. Buffy just as simply could have killed Dawn on that tower to save the day but gave her life.

And going by your logic, Willow Xander Tara and Anya all made the decision to bring Buffy back to life which put the entire world in danger, so I fail to see how Buffy takes all the blame here. It just doesn't make sense for Buffy's closest friends to toss her out like that based on a miscalculated call.
 
NightLady
NightLady
well said
I always hated that line. I always disliked everybody - aside from Xander - in that scene. Some of them were out of place in talking back to Buffy (Anya, Kennedy, FREAKING Dawn), while some of them were just plainly out of character (Willow for example). However, a few days ago, while I was chatting with a friend about how Buffy went through so much in the show, this scene suddenly popped in my mind and I realized this: all the potentials, and even some of the others in the house, did NOT see everything that Buffy did or had to go through as a Slayer. WE did. Of course from OUR point of view, these people are out of their mind to talk crap like that, but from THEIR point of view, all they know about her is what they've heard and what they saw (a few glimpses into the whole that is Buffy) in the past weeks, which included going head first into a trap. As you could expect, they can't balance out what just happened (and is still fresh in their frightened minds) with memories of years of good decisions made by Buffy. The present is much more real for them, and thus they are worried about Buffy's decisions making skills.

Alright, I'm not trying to DEFEND them, because I still think they should have just left the house if they weren't happy (starting with Dawn), but this was to show how our point of view in that scene is very different from theirs.
 
NightLady
NightLady
[No message]
The insult

There was certainly no need for the insult because it's obvious Buffy got the hint and Dawn didn't like asking Buffy to leave.
Everyone deserved their opinion of Buffy's leadership, she was strict but that is the sign of a good leader and of course she made a mistake when she attacked Caleb's hideout but then again we all make mistiges. Even Napoleon Bonaparte who was one of the greatest leaders of all time made the mistake of invading Russia and that went disastorously.
I don't know what to think of Rona as a character but for that one insult I can let that slide.
 
[MENTION=12236]itssmiletime[/MENTION]

Who in the Verse hasn't made a bad decision that caused someone to die? Xander in OMWF, Willow killing Warren. Neither of them really got any grief for what they did, because of what? They didn't kill anyone they personally knew or cared about? Also its kind of crazy to say the world doesn't owe Buffy anything, she saved the world numerous times because it was her job and didn't ask anything in return out of principle, but that doesn't mean her world didn't owe her anything. I was making the point that Dawn especially owed her, since Buffy specifically gave up her own life to spare Dawns. Buffy just as simply could have killed Dawn on that tower to save the day but gave her life.

And going by your logic, Willow Xander Tara and Anya all made the decision to bring Buffy back to life which put the entire world in danger, so I fail to see how Buffy takes all the blame here. It just doesn't make sense for Buffy's closest friends to toss her out like that based on a miscalculated call.

I agree that they shouldn't have brought Buffy back, but the thing that differs that situation from Buffy's is that at least Willow did the basics. She was good. She did research. All the ingredients were exactly as they should be. Purely brilliant. Buffy didn't even know anything about Caleb- what he looked like, purpose, the structure of the vineyard. It's far more than a miscalculated call- in Empty Places, she had the nerve to say 'Spike is the only one watching my back' whilst Xander is in the hospital, without an eye, because he believed in her. No wonder he lost faith in her.

And people in the verse who hadn't made a bad decision leading to a death? Um... Tara, Dawn, Anne Steele, etc.

I strongly believe that unless their is a contract, there is no debt I offically owe you. Sounds cold hearted, I know but it's true. I can't give people's opinions more weight than others based on previous experiences. I don't care what you have done in the past. To give someone's opinions and experiences more weight is purely undemocratic.

The reason why I am so tough on Buffy in S7 is primarily because of the line 'I am the law'. Very arrogant and self-righteous. And that's the price she is going to pay for that. I am extremely strict on every legal system, as should everyone. Xander, Willow don't pretend to be the law, so I don't have to judge them for that. I mean, when Willow says 'I was brilliant' I expect her to be brilliant, and she was.

Respect can always be lost, and personally, I can't respect anyone who calls or thinks any victim of suicide as weak, pressures friends to do things they don't want to do- regardless of the situation at hand. I just can't, and I don't want to, and I shouldn't have to. I don't care if you save the world on a daily basis, because under all that, you can still be a rotten, vile individual- who doesn't deserve respect because of all of that ugly ignorance. To me, you are trash.


Not even respect? That's all we're suggesting she is owed. I think it's a very little thing to expect a self-sacrificing human being to be treated with respect in her own home, which Rona did *not* do in the *way* she voiced her opinion.


But the Buffyverse is all about past events and how they continue to affect our lives. As for the "physical assault", she thought Dawn was a *demon*. It's easily excusable. And if I saw a teenager girl dancing inappropriately and dressed to barely cover her body in public I and most people would have a problem with it. She's underage. Buffy is her parental figure. She's in charge and that means being aware of how something like this could negatively affect Dawn and putting a stop to it.

As for the neglect: that I agree with; but then no one, Dawn included, acted well in season six so I don't hold Buffy to any different standard there than the other characters.

No, it's not easily excusable. It's physical assault, full stop. If anyone did that to me, for whatever reason whatsoever, no matter who they are, I'd have them arrested so fast. If a police officer did that to me, I would be suing them so much. And what evidence did Buffy have that she was a demon? Blinking from a trance spell? What proof is that? And let's not forget that Buffy is 10 times more physically powerful than Dawn, Dawn could have easily gotten her neck snapped...

Buffy was so out out line in Him- saying 'I'm glad our mother isn't around to see that' or 'Anna Nicole Smith finds you tacky'. And Dawn was wearing a tight jeans and a shirt. Well within the dress codes. It's not bad, at all. It's rude, full stop to insult someone's choice of clothing. I don't care if Buffy's her parental figure- those lines are not on. I dress more provactive at times, and at Dawn's age as well, and anyone, even family who'd dare call me trashy or sleazy or 'slutty' (a word I detest so much), I would give them hell.

About the Buffyverse being 'about past events'- by that logic, so is real life. I, and alot of people won't give people's opinions more weight than others. A lot of people put others through the ringer to earn their personal respect (I do) and you aren't going to earn it based on title or past achievements alone.

I always hated that line. I always disliked everybody - aside from Xander - in that scene. Some of them were out of place in talking back to Buffy (Anya, Kennedy, FREAKING Dawn), while some of them were just plainly out of character (Willow for example). However, a few days ago, while I was chatting with a friend about how Buffy went through so much in the show, this scene suddenly popped in my mind and I realized this: all the potentials, and even some of the others in the house, did NOT see everything that Buffy did or had to go through as a Slayer. WE did. Of course from OUR point of view, these people are out of their mind to talk crap like that, but from THEIR point of view, all they know about her is what they've heard and what they saw (a few glimpses into the whole that is Buffy) in the past weeks, which included going head first into a trap. As you could expect, they can't balance out what just happened (and is still fresh in their frightened minds) with memories of years of good decisions made by Buffy. The present is much more real for them, and thus they are worried about Buffy's decisions making skills.

Alright, I'm not trying to DEFEND them, because I still think they should have just left the house if they weren't happy (starting with Dawn), but this was to show how our point of view in that scene is very different from theirs.

I despise the notion of being 'out of place'. If you have an opinion, say it. I don't care how old you are, how many people who you've killed, your experience...

I agree that Willow is out of character. She's too passive. Real Willow would say 'We're not your little minions that you can boss around and walk all over'. But Willow in S7 was so regressed...

And so what if Buffy has suffered? So has everyone. Everyone has gone through crap. But no, she is The Slayer, and she whines alot and angsts, so her suffering is given more weight.

she was strict but that is the sign of a good leader and of course she made a mistake when she attacked Caleb's hideout but then again we all make mistiges. Even Napoleon Bonaparte who was one of the greatest leaders of all time made the mistake of invading Russia and that went disastorously.
I don't know what to think of Rona as a character but for that one insult I can let that slide.

Being strict is a sign of a good leader? No, it's not. Being a good leader is being able to assess the situation, building and maintaining trust, having a thorough understanding of who you are working with. Buffy doesn't do any of those three. She never assessed the situations involving Spike's trigger and the vineyard, she constantly insults people at every turn, and not maintaining trust and she doesn't understand that people will despise you (and rightly so) if you boss them around and treat them like dirt. No compassion for Buffy, at all.
 
NightLady
NightLady
totally
I always hated that line. I always disliked everybody - aside from Xander - in that scene. Some of them were out of place in talking back to Buffy (Anya, Kennedy, FREAKING Dawn), while some of them were just plainly out of character (Willow for example). However, a few days ago, while I was chatting with a friend about how Buffy went through so much in the show, this scene suddenly popped in my mind and I realized this: all the potentials, and even some of the others in the house, did NOT see everything that Buffy did or had to go through as a Slayer. WE did. Of course from OUR point of view, these people are out of their mind to talk crap like that, but from THEIR point of view, all they know about her is what they've heard and what they saw (a few glimpses into the whole that is Buffy) in the past weeks, which included going head first into a trap. As you could expect, they can't balance out what just happened (and is still fresh in their frightened minds) with memories of years of good decisions made by Buffy. The present is much more real for them, and thus they are worried about Buffy's decisions making skills.

Alright, I'm not trying to DEFEND them, because I still think they should have just left the house if they weren't happy (starting with Dawn), but this was to show how our point of view in that scene is very different from theirs.


I like your reasoning. One should always consider the character's point of view before judging their actions.
And in this case I agree with you that the potentials’ distrust should be understood - given that they do not know what we know about Buffy and also given what had just happened – but my problem with Rona’s words is more about Buffy opening her house to someone who was a perfect stranger to her, giving her hospitality, protection, food (and her trust!) without her having no obligation whatsoever to do so.
Buffy deserved Rona’s (and everyone else) gratitude and respect for that, if for nothing else.

Anyway, I believe we are of the same mind, but I just wanted to point this out 🙂
 
I agree that they shouldn't have brought Buffy back, but the thing that differs that situation from Buffy's is that at least Willow did the basics. She was good. She did research. All the ingredients were exactly as they should be. Purely brilliant. Buffy didn't even know anything about Caleb- what he looked like, purpose, the structure of the vineyard. It's far more than a miscalculated call- in Empty Places, she had the nerve to say 'Spike is the only one watching my back' whilst Xander is in the hospital, without an eye, because he believed in her. No wonder he lost faith in her.

Excellent paragraph. Agree completely.

I strongly believe that unless their is a contract, there is no debt I offically owe you. Sounds cold hearted, I know but it's true. I can't give people's opinions more weight than others based on previous experiences. I don't care what you have done in the past. To give someone's opinions and experiences more weight is purely undemocratic.

This is pretty cold-hearted. Friends do because they want to do, yes, but if someone goes out of their way, many times over, to help me and I won't give them the time of day because there's no "contract", then I'm a dick, plain and simple. It isn't about giving certain people's opinions more weight than others, it's about respect.

And, frankly, that's just how the world works. People, in almost every profession, get promoted or demoted based on what they have done in the past. Why is that a bad thing? Athletes make more if they have successful seasons, Lt. Colonels become generals because of previous success (meaning their opinions carry more weight) and senators, congressmen and governors become Presidents because of what they've done in the past. All of those things happen because people have faith in them because of what they have done. That IS democracy. If I'm in the Situation Room at the White House on the eve of battle, whose opinion should be worth more: Mine or the President's? To say we're equal, given our history, is a joke.

The reason why I am so tough on Buffy in S7 is primarily because of the line 'I am the law'. Very arrogant and self-righteous. And that's the price she is going to pay for that. I am extremely strict on every legal system, as should everyone. Xander, Willow don't pretend to be the law, so I don't have to judge them for that. I mean, when Willow says 'I was brilliant' I expect her to be brilliant, and she was.

This is very fair. Buffy is incredibly arrogant in S7. To me, her lack of respect not only for her friends and charges is paralleled by her almost complete lack of respect for Caleb and The First, which is catastrophic.

Buffy was so out out line in Him- saying 'I'm glad our mother isn't around to see that' or 'Anna Nicole Smith finds you tacky'. And Dawn was wearing a tight jeans and a shirt. Well within the dress codes. It's not bad, at all. It's rude, full stop to insult someone's choice of clothing. I don't care if Buffy's her parental figure- those lines are not on. I dress more provactive at times, and at Dawn's age as well, and anyone, even family who'd dare call me trashy or sleazy or 'slutty' (a word I detest so much), I would give them hell.

I could be mistaken, so forgive me if I am, but wasn't Buffy under the jacket's spell in that episode? Again, I haven't seen it in a long time, so I could have the time line mixed up.

About the Buffyverse being 'about past events'- by that logic, so is real life. I, and alot of people won't give people's opinions more weight than others. A lot of people put others through the ringer to earn their personal respect (I do) and you aren't going to earn it based on title or past achievements alone.

But...title comes from past achievements, and pretty by definition, putting others through the ringer comes from past achievements. I understand that the Potentials weren't around for much of Buffy's previous successes, so there's some leeway there, but Willow and Company were. You're right, that is real life. People with tremendous past success DO get afforded more weight to their opinions when their opinion is related to the field of their success. Buffy was wrong, she screwed up tremendously (with both agree on that), but her track record indicated that her people should have had that faith in her. I'm not defending Buffy, she was brutal in that period, I'm just talking reality here. That's true in every walk of life.
 
I despise the notion of being 'out of place'. If you have an opinion, say it. I don't care how old you are, how many people who you've killed, your experience...

I agree that Willow is out of character. She's too passive. Real Willow would say 'We're not your little minions that you can boss around and walk all over'. But Willow in S7 was so regressed...

And so what if Buffy has suffered? So has everyone. Everyone has gone through crap. But no, she is The Slayer, and she whines alot and angsts, so her suffering is given more weight.

By out of place I didn't mean to imply that it had to do with age or experience... I meant that they were in BUFFY's house. They had ran to Sunnydale and Buffy for help. They were dependent on the Buffster. If they weren't happy with what she thought was best, they could voice their opinion, sure, but they had NO rights to kick The Slayer out of her OWN house. And yes, the fact that they had just barely arrived there mattered in how important their opinion was in the grand scheme of things.

Willow was out of character, but not in the way you put it. Willow would have simply NEVER went against Buffy like that. She would have tried to calm everybody down, but certainly not outright sided against Buffy like she ended up doing in that god forsaken scene!

Xander's retort I could accept, because he was still shocked from having lost an eye. He was most likely a little angry and feeling like blaming Buffy (but at the same time, he knew she couldn't know beforehand what would happen).

Dawn... just wow. I don't even wanna go into it. It was so unbelievably wrong that I couldn't help but feel like it was forced by the writers just to put Buffy into even more emotional distress.

Anya... SHUT UP! She didn't even deserve to say a word after all she did.

Faith was surprisingly the one that, despite being against Buffy in the argument, showed some respect for her fellow Slayer and actually stayed true to character.

All in all, that scene always pisses me off and I still surprise myself wishing for Spike's presence so a few asses can be kicked. 😉
 
Last edited:
@itssmiletime

I can't give people's opinions more weight than others based on previous experiences. I don't care what you have done in the past. To give someone's opinions and experiences more weight is purely undemocratic.

Democracy can be great but it's not to be applied across the board. I wouldn't stroll into a hospital and assume my medical opinion is equal to that of the Doctor's with their 7+ years of training and experience.

The reason why I am so tough on Buffy in S7 is primarily because of the line 'I am the law'. Very arrogant and self-righteous. And that's the price she is going to pay for that. I am extremely strict on every legal system, as should everyone.

What exactly do you expect from Buffy? Of course she is the law for the Supernatural in Sunnydale. How well was everything going in the Wishverse when she wasn't around to enforce it? It's not like she's overly harsh with it either. Don't attack people. It's a pretty basic legal system that she tries to uphold mostly by herself. If you're a demon who can't cope with this then Sunnydale isn't your best bet for a place to live.

No, it's not easily excusable. It's physical assault, full stop. If anyone did that to me, for whatever reason whatsoever, no matter who they are, I'd have them arrested so fast. If a police officer did that to me, I would be suing them so much. And what evidence did Buffy have that she was a demon? Blinking from a trance spell? What proof is that? And let's not forget that Buffy is 10 times more physically powerful than Dawn, Dawn could have easily gotten her neck snapped...

So you don't feel the need to cut Buffy any slack what so ever? Your solution to this problem as Dawn would have been to get Buffy thrown into prison? So Buffy's mum is dying at the time but this shouldn't be considered. Buffy has spent the last 5-7 years under constant attack by demons and this shouldn't be considered. Dawn has been thrust into her life without any consent and Buffy has had her memories and personality altered but this shouldn't get any consideration either. Probably for the best that Dawn is a little bit more forgiving and understanding than that. Otherwise that would have been the least of her problems when Glory opened the gates of hell and Buffy was sat in prison twiddling her thumbs.
 
Lyri
Lyri
[No message]
R
Robb Stark
[No message]
@ The Bronze:
Even when it comes to the field of medicine, I am still well, within my rights to refuse treatment and medication. Of course I’m more likely to listen to a doctor, yet at the end of the day, it is still my decision of how I approach with certain issues.

Buffy isn’t the law for Sunnydale. Why is she the law, and not Willow, Giles or Xander? Because she’s the slayer? A system where she was chosen, not voted for, where there is no democracy whatsoever that exists whatsoever? Where she is not even the most powerful being in the verse? Where she knows next to nothing about demons whatsoever? Where all it takes is an injection to stop being the slayer? Where she runs away for 3 months? Where she says ‘I’ll kill anyone who goes near Dawn”? Who couldn’t kill Angelus? As I explained earlier, my harshness comes out of her arrogance. My problem with the line stems out of her opinion simply having more weight as she is the slayer, as opposed to Xander, even though he has been in the fight against evil for a long period of time. I don’t care that Buffy is the slayer. It didn’t impress me when I was fourteen, it doesn’t impress me now.

And no, I’m not gonna give Buffy some slack. Everyone should get equal punishment, no one is above it, or anything like that. I expect a president to get the same punishment for murder as a random citizen would. Heaps of people get sent to prison who have shit lives who contribute to society. It’s no excuse. It’s assault. And really- there are alternatives to prison, such as community service, and heavy fines.
[MENTION=9740]Tome[/MENTION]
Anya was not out of line. Hey, I don’t care who you are, if you have an opinion, voice it. She contributes to the war effort- and if someone insulted me the way Buffy did to Anya in Get It Done, I would do far, far, far worse than what Anya did. It’s payback, completely justified and fair.

I disagree about Willow- she sided against Buffy in Tough Love, The Yoko Factor, Fear Itself. Oh how I miss the defiant, Willow ‘being the slayer doesn’t automatically make you boss’ Rosenberg.
[MENTION=11975]Robb Stark[/MENTION]:
Okay I’ll say this. Say if someone says to me that the person I’m about to be spending a lot of time with in the next couple of months has saved the world, you will get my initial respect. Yet that respect can be lost. So I can’t respect ignorant people, who pressure their friends and treat them like trash. I mean- I’d respect Giles, Xander, Dawn, etc- but not Buffy as they had not lost the respect.

Also- about your argument regarding ‘the way world works’- I understand. Although, it should be said that even presidents still have to justify their actions, people and co-workers can say no, share their opinion and input. I have nothing against that- what I have is Buffy thinking she make claims such as ‘bad guys always go where the power is’ without giving thorough examples, allowing arguments, etc. I mean, even doctors and lawyers and politicians and engineers have to justify their decisions to those who it effects- I mean, if they don’t, the results are disastrous. I wouldn’t let a surgeon perform an operation on me unless I knew the full details, why it needed to be performed, etc. And a good surgeon would never say ‘shut up, I’m a doctor I know what’s best’. They’d you know, answer any questions, use examples of body autonomy, how it functions, a full in depth discussion of risks, etc. If that makes sense.

About Him- well, in the scene in the Bronze, Buffy isn’t under the spell, as she isn’t close enough to RJ to be under the spell. She becomes under the jacket’s spell in a later part of the episode, as does Willow and Anya
 
Black Eye Guy
Black Eye Guy
[No message]
Ethan Reigns
Ethan Reigns
[No message]
R
Robb Stark
Good points.
@itssmiletime

Even when it comes to the field of medicine, I am still well, within my rights to refuse treatment and medication. Of course I’m more likely to listen to a doctor, yet at the end of the day, it is still my decision of how I approach with certain issues.

Yes it would be entirely your call about your treatment. But if you chose to listen to me who'd wandered in off the street over the Doctor then chances are you'd be making a bad call. Similarly if we then both decided to throw the Doctor out of the hospital after he'd been trying to help then it would be baffling.

Buffy isn’t the law for Sunnydale.

Yes she is. Just because you're not happy with the situation doesn't mean it isn't the case. She's made the big decision on the supernatural since her arrival in town.

Why is she the law, and not Willow, Giles or Xander? Because she’s the slayer? A system where she was chosen, not voted for, where there is no democracy whatsoever that exists whatsoever?

Yep the slayer system isn't exactly perfect. But it is what it is. No use grumbling about the fact no one voted for Buffy to have the power. Better off being grateful that she chooses to help with it. She could just pack up and leave the world to it. She'd have a much better chance in any given post apocalyspe situation than most. Did you see Giles, Xander or Willow stick their hand up and ask to be the law? Giles has trained Buffy since day one to make decisions. Essentially saying "you're the slayer Buffy, get on with it". Also he's a guest in Sunnydale at the times. Willow as the law? Willow who was seconds away from destroying the planet a few months earlier? You'd like her in charge of safety on the Hellmouth? Then there's Xander. Limited fighting ability and never been in charge of the group at any point in 7 seasons. He was hardly in a position to be the law in Sunnydale.

Where she is not even the most powerful being in the verse?

She's the most powerful on the human side with any degree of control of the power.

And no, I’m not gonna give Buffy some slack. Everyone should get equal punishment, no one is above it, or anything like that. I expect a president to get the same punishment for murder as a random citizen would. Heaps of people get sent to prison who have shit lives who contribute to society. It’s no excuse. It’s assault. And really- there are alternatives to prison, such as community service, and heavy fines.

In the real world I'd probably agree with you. In the extreme situations of the Buffyverse I just don't understand that kind of reasoning. I'd cut Buffy some slack given the circumstances. You'd be entitled not to as long as you'd be prepared not to moan as the world's ending and Buffy is busy rotting in jail or picking up trash or is simply past caring about helping people when no one wants to give her a break.
 
Back
Top Bottom