Eliminating "Seeing Red"

white avenger

white avenger
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
16,036
Age
78
Location
rome, georgia
Every time that a discussion about Spike and his relationship with Buffy prior to Season 7, or just Spike in general, this episode comes up. So here's the question. If that episode had never happened, would it make a difference in how you feel about Spike? (This is about Spike as a character, not as Buffy's romantic interest)
 
Joan the Vampire Slayer
Joan the Vampire Slayer
Woot, this thread is really picking up, eh?
Hmmm. Well, yes and no. The AR is something that I struggled with so much, because it goes so much against my nature to like a character who could even try to do that. Rape is one of those issues that takes over everything, no matter how the characters behaved or acted before. Reconciling the Spike I love with the Spike who attempted to assault Buffy is a really difficult thing. I've come to terms with it as instant in which Spike saw the evil in him and fought back against it, and in that sense I support it. I think it was sloppy writing and a terrible misuse of both characters, and I think it could have been done better. But ultimately I understand its purpose.

Spike needed something to wake him up to the fact that being "not good" is NOT okay, and that he had to have some kind of concience in order to be the kind of man he wanted. He had all the pieces of a hero inside of him, but he had to make an effort to put them together.
 
Probably no. I don't like Spike as a big good person, I like him acting like a big bad. Spike in season 7 is mostly this insane guy Buffy cares about because she belives he can be a better man, so I don't think that scene efected on my opinion of him, but it did efected my opinion on that does he really love her. In the end, he was without a soul, that was his monster side.
 
Every time that a discussion about Spike and his relationship with Buffy prior to Season 7, or just Spike in general, this episode comes up. So here's the question. If that episode had never happened, would it make a difference in how you feel about Spike? (This is about Spike as a character, not as Buffy's romantic interest)

You got this idea from my 'Episode Deletion' thread, didn't you? 😉

This is such a GREAT QUESTION. I'm so excited to see what people say. I remember someone once saying on here that if Angelus had raped Buffy in S2 that they would feel much differently about Bangel. I found that really interesting.

Would it change how I feel about Spike's character? Yes. I mean, if he hadn't tried to rape Buffy, then he would have never gotten a soul, so the writers would have had to explore Spike's ability to be good without one. That would have been a totally different thing. That could have been really interesting, though. For me, Spike not having a soul but having the ability to be good anyway, would make me love him even more, if that's possible. It would make him ever more special.

Yet, I know the question isn't about Spuffy but just one comment I'd like to make: even if the events of 'Chosen' had played out in exactly the same way and 'Seeing Red' had never been written, I don't think we would have gotten our "I love you." I don't think Buffy could admit she loved someone without a soul. Yet, if we hadn't had those three words, then we also wouldn't have had to listen to Spike's "No you don't..." which is by far my most-hated line in the 'verse.
 
I would've loved to see Spike being good without a soul. I have 100% confidence in his ability to do so. I would've preferred to see Buffy have a revelation about how things aren't so black and white as soul: good; no soul: bad, than see Spike go off to get a soul. But if they really needed him to go get a soul, they could've found another way (one that wasn't so contrary to what Spike would have done at that point in time).
 
You got this idea from my 'Episode Deletion' thread, didn't you? 😉

if he hadn't tried to rape Buffy, then he would have never gotten a soul,

I got the idea partially from your thread, but also, as I said, "Seeing Red" is the first thing that everyone points to when they condemn the Spuffy relationship.

As for Spike not getting a soul without SR happening, I'm not too sure. What he did, the way that it had to be done, even the mundane details of getting there and getting back, seem to me to indicate a well thought out plan, not a spur of the moment whim. It's my opinion that he had been considering regaining his soul for some time, if for no other reason than that Buffy and all of her friends kept reminding him that he didn't have one. "Seeing Red" might have been the final factor in his decision, but I think that it was something that he had been thinking about for some time, possibly since Buffy's death.
 
Being honest here, the Spuffy relationship was too violent for me and THAT episode killed most positive feels I had towards Spike. Rape is a difficult subject for me as I have experienced it. Weither it was attempted or full on, it is disgusting. SO, if Seeing Red had never happened it would have changed my feelings towards Spike considerably. And, I did enjoy Spike in Angel the series and would have enjoyed his character so much more if it had never happened.

As far as Spuffy goes, I did not really like the realtionship but loved the friendship between the two and would have enjoyed seeing more of that than the sex lol.
 
I just don't understand why fans can't forgive Spike for what he did without a soul, yet they have no trouble forgiving Angel for what he did as Angelus. Angelus did some awful things, but those don't ruin his character for me at all. Just like Spike's AR doesn't make me feel less for him. I just don't get it! I don't mean to single you out here NIX, but why does the AR make you like Spike less because of it? What about Angel? Do you like Angel less because his alter-ego killed Jenny? Somehow I think not.
 
E
EveryNiteISaveU
I can see your point on this, definitely. I often wonder why people don't couple in how many "wrongs" Angel has done while Angelus.
I just don't understand why fans can't forgive Spike for what he did without a soul, yet they have no trouble forgiving Angel for what he did as Angelus. Angelus did some awful things, but those don't ruin his character for me at all. Just like Spike's AR doesn't make me feel less for him. I just don't get it! I don't mean to single you out here NIX, but why does the AR make you like Spike less because of it? What about Angel? Do you like Angel less because his alter-ego killed Jenny? Somehow I think not.

I'm not Nix, but I think it's because Spike started his road to redemption without his soul, and most of us fell in love with him for it. He was the only character in the 'verse to be a full-on vampire like the ones Buffy fought against, but to also be a central character instead of a villian. We, or at least I, began holding him up to human standards and not demonic ones.

Part of the reason I don't like the soul, no matter how much I like soulled-Spike, is because it's too easy to draw that line. It's too easy to say, "The moment he got his soul is the moment he turned good." I just don't believe that. He had good in him before then, but people far too often cut it off so that he was a good guy in S7 but a villian the rest of the time.

If Angelus had raped Buffy, I would feel different about him. It's exactly this reason that I don't like the way the writers dabbled in the issue of rape without really doing it justice. It was a plot device to spur Spike's development, but for most people it's just hard to move past. Especially, I imagine, if you've been in a situation like that before. If I ever had been, it probably would have broken my heart and ruined his character.
 
E
Eleftheria
I know that this moment inspired Spike to go be a better man...to be actually a man. But this moment was disturbing and Spike or Angelus I would have felt the same
There was a reason I didn't post in the Episode Deletion thread, and that's because I wouldn't want to delete an episode, even 'Seeing Red'. (My website is named after it, come on!) Yes, I hate the ep, yes, I hated Spike's character in this ep, but if we never had it, so many things would have been changed.

Spike never would have gotten his soul back, Buffy never would have been strong enough to realize that she needs to be there for Dawn. Xander finding Buffy in the bathroom made him realize he'd been neglecting his friends. There were a lot of positives that came out of that episode, so no, I wouldn't delete it.

I do think it makes us all look at Spike in a different light. In that one scene we learn that Spike is still a vampire, he is still the bad guy, capable of causing a lot of hurt. I think most of us forgot that when it was all shiny-happy Spuffy love.

Remember, the first thing Spike thought when he realized he could hurt Buffy was that the chip was dead, and the first thing he did was go out and try to kill someone. When he realized it was just Buffy, he attacked her, telling her he wasn't going to hurt her 'much'. That was only a handful of episodes before 'Seeing Red' but most of us forget that because we were too busy hoping that Spuffy would be the ship to end all ships.

'Seeing Red' for me, did nothing more than remind me that, at this point, Spike was still the Big Bad, and at the time, I felt really silly for forgetting that and getting caught up in the 'romance' for want of a better word.
 
I generally believe that season 6 spuffy was unhealthy and wrong by BOTH sides. Spike wants Buffy and when Buffy has nothing left(she can't talk to her friends or Dawn and feels totally empty) she gives in. And then they start treating each other very badly, only like sex toys. Instead of Spike helping Buffy getting better I felt that he was driving her further to the darkness constantly reminding her that "she came back wrong", "she is an animal" , "she belongs to the darkness". On these things I can't put the blame to Spike cause Buffy knew better...he had no soul and although he cared about her the only thing that stopped him from actually doing evil stuff ,like killing people, was a chip. His "love" was feelings coming from a soulless demon who maybe more human than other vampires but still his idea of loving is much different.

So, when "seeing red" attempted rape happened, that did it for me. I mean I was already fed up with the situation, so rape or no rape I didn't like the season 6 feeling.
But that moment, his look, her screams like any other normal girl who has no superpowers to defend herself from such an obnoxious act was extremely disturbing for me.

(And honestly...there is one thing I never understood. It is alright and really understandable that Buffy feels crappy about life and the world since she was pulled out of Heaven by her own friends, but why hating herself and using Spike to face it?)
 
Wishing Oceans
Wishing Oceans
[No message]
I do think it makes us all look at Spike in a different light. In that one scene we learn that Spike is still a vampire, he is still the bad guy, capable of causing a lot of hurt. I think most of us forgot that when it was all shiny-happy Spuffy love.

Remember, the first thing Spike thought when he realized he could hurt Buffy was that the chip was dead, and the first thing he did was go out and try to kill someone. When he realized it was just Buffy, he attacked her, telling her he wasn't going to hurt her 'much'. That was only a handful of episodes before 'Seeing Red' but most of us forget that because we were too busy hoping that Spuffy would be the ship to end all ships.

'Seeing Red' for me did nothing more than remind me that, at this point, Spike was still the Big Bad, and at the time, I felt really silly for forgetting that and getting caught up in the 'romance' for want of a better word.

Eh, I don't really agree. I don't think it showed that Spike was the "bad guy," or the "Big Bad" necessarily, just that he was completely screwed-up like everyone else. Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending him or what he did. I'd never do that. But it didn't make me think, "Oh, right! Spike's evil, how could I forget? DUH!" It made me sad and disappointed and disgusted with him, which was the way he felt about himself.

Season 6 was NOT the season that showed Spike was an irredeemable bad guy. It was a season that was hard on ALL of the characters, Spike especially. Yes, he is capable of causing a lot of hurt. But so was Xander, when he left Anya at the alter. So was Buffy, when she pounded Spike's face in even though it was really herself she hated. So was Willow, when she manipulated and toyed with the love of her life, and then went evil after that love died. This season showed that everybody was the Big Bad, not just Spike.

Plus, Spuffy was never shiny or happy in Season 6, at least not to me. It was twisted and wrong because the two involved hated themselves and each other. I admit it was hot, but I never rooted for them to make it, at least not in that way.

I admit I make allowances for Spike, because that's what we all do with our favorite characters. But when he went to attack that woman, I saw it as a sign of progression, not regression. Yes, he was trying to kill someone, but it seemed more because that's what was expected of him than because he really wanted to. He had to talk himself into it, and who knows if he really would have done it? I'd love to say no, but that might be putting too much faith in him. Anyway you look at it though, he's not the same vamp. He would never truly want to kill Buffy, not after seeing her dead, and he doesn't appear to be completely enthralled with idea of killing again, either. With Spike, you can't always hold him to the highest standards. Yes, he should be judged more harshly than other vamps because of his humanity, but you have to consider what he was versus what he became. It was a long, hard climb for him to be good.
 
This season showed that everybody was the Big Bad, not just Spike.

I didn't mean the Big Band of S6 when I said that, I meant, Big Bad as in the name Spike uses when he's referring to himself.

Plus, Spuffy was never shiny or happy in Season 6, at least not to me. It was twisted and wrong because the two involved hated themselves and each other. I admit it was hot, but I never rooted for them to make it, at least not in that way.

That was sarcasm, when I said that. Back when S6 was on the air, Spike was my favorite character, and I wanted him to have that perfect ever after with Buffy. I was sure that things would work out between them, and they'd get that happily ever after. Spike is no longer my favorite character (ignore the AV) but he is still in my top 5, but I can say that is was a combination of this ep, plus watching the whole series back to back within a matter of weeks that made me realize what I'd missed back then.

But when he went to attack that woman, I saw it as a sign of progression, not regression. He had to talk himself into it, and who knows if he really would have done it?

To me, it doesn't matter if he would have went through with it or not, the point is he TRIED. The first thing he thought he should do when he thought the chip was broken was to kill. Doesn't matter that he had to psyche himself up, that could be put down to the fact that he'd gone more than two years without killing a human and he needed to remind himself that who he was. Yes, he's a vampire, yes, it's in his nature, but if everyone is making the argument that he was different, that loving Buffy made him a better man, then shouldn't he have known that doing this would be the best way to make sure Buffy would NEVER truly love him?

He would never truly want to kill Buffy, not after seeing her dead, and he doesn't appear to be completely enthralled with idea of killing again, either.

He did choose to attack Buffy, though, in that abandoned house. He said himself, he went in with the purpose of not hurting her 'much' which means he wanted to hurt her 'some'. Buffy didn't return his affections, so he attacked her. In 'Seeing Red' she didn't return his affections, so he attacked her again.

As far as I can remember, Spike didn't stop his attack, Buffy MADE him stop. It was only then that he realized what he'd done, and was horrified by his actions. If Buffy hadn't been able to stop him, I really don't think, at that precise moment, that Spike would have been able to stop himself. And we wouldn't be talking AR here, it would have been just plain R.

'Seeing Red' reminded all of us, Spike and Buffy included, that Spike was still a soulless vampire, capable of killing Buffy if she breathed wrong. Or attempting to, anyway. It forced everyone to come to terms with their actions, forced Buffy to be a better mother, Xander to be a better friend, and Spike to be a better man, which he ultimately became.

With Spike, you can't always hold him to the highest standards. Yes, he should be judged more harshly than other vamps because of his humanity, but you have to consider what he was versus what he became. It was a long, hard climb for him to be good.

I don't hold Spike to any standards. Yes, he got himself a soul because he wanted to be the man he thought Buffy deserved, but I don't think 'Seeing Red' or the AR should be disregarded when people are talking about Spike and the Spuffy relationship, which so many people seem to do. Spike fans like to point out that Spike didn't have a soul when 'Seeing Red' took place, so he shouldn't be held accountable for his actions. But then in the same breath they're saying that Spike was a changed man by the time S6 rolled around, he was considered able to look after Dawn alone, he fought with the Scoobies, he found a way to be good. They can't have it both ways.
 
K
Kelsey
Love the Jo/Alona signature!
B
BillyidolwannaB
[No message]
I didn't mean the Big Band of S6 when I said that, I meant, Big Bad as in the name Spike uses when he's referring to himself.

I more or less understood that. I just wanted to point out that all of the Scoobies had done terrible things and hurt the people they loved. I would argue that Willow's abuse of Tara was almost as bad as Spike's abuse of Buffy. But we don't have a firm grasp magic and mind-raping because it's not real. The scene with Buffy and Spike could have just as easily been a real-life scenario.

That was sarcasm, when I said that. Back when S6 was on the air, Spike was my favorite character, and I wanted him to have that perfect ever after with Buffy. I was sure that things would work out between them, and they'd get that happily ever after. Spike is no longer my favorite character (ignore the AV) but he is still in my top 5, but I can say that is was a combination of this ep, plus watching the whole series back to back within a matter of weeks that made me realize what I'd missed back then.

Hah, my bad! Sarcasm does make more sense. Regarding the fact that you rewatched it and "caught what you missed," though, that makes me sad. I've rewatched numerous times and still see what I always saw. Glad he still managed to claw out a place in top 5, though!

To me, it doesn't matter if he would have went through with it or not, the point is he TRIED. The first thing he thought he should do when he thought the chip was broken was to kill. Doesn't matter that he had to psyche himself up, that could be put down to the fact that he'd gone more than two years without killing a human and he needed to remind himself that who he was. Yes, he's a vampire, yes, it's in his nature, but if everyone is making the argument that he was different, that loving Buffy made him a better man, then shouldn't he have known that doing this would be the best way to make sure Buffy would NEVER truly love him?

Of course you're right. He did try, and he may have succeeded if he'd been able. I completely understand how that can be viewed the other way. But the way I look at it is, if you tell a man he's a monster long enough, what's he going to try to be but a monster? Spike has always had a problem with his identity, most especially with Buffy and the chip. Loving Buffy did make him a better man. Even by S6 he was better than he had been before. However, I never said that made him a good man. But comparatively, from mass-murdering without thought to having to jazz himself up for the kill, that's already a vast improvement.

If you look at Spike with a strict moral code, you'll never like him. You just can't, because the fact is, he did start as a murderer. If you look at him as an evolving character, though, then you'll find him one of the most interesting in the "˜verse. Or at least I did.



He did choose to attack Buffy, though, in that abandoned house. He said himself, he went in with the purpose of not hurting her 'much' which means he wanted to hurt her 'some'. Buffy didn't return his affections, so he attacked her. In 'Seeing Red' she didn't return his affections, so he attacked her again.
Yes, he attacked her, but he wouldn't kill her. That was my point. Violence was in his nature, just like it was in hers. If there's any way they ever connected in S6, it was through that. And don't forget, Buffy wanted to hurt him too, and more than that, she wanted him to hurt her.

As far as I can remember, Spike didn't stop his attack, Buffy MADE him stop. It was only then that he realized what he'd done, and was horrified by his actions. If Buffy hadn't been able to stop him, I really don't think, at that precise moment, that Spike would have been able to stop himself. And we wouldn't be talking AR here, it would have been just plain R.

Yes, that's true. It was clear that he had completely checked out in that scene, and that in itself was terrifying to watch. Once he came back to himself and realized what he'd done, he was horrified, but I don't think Spike would have been able to stop himself either. It's what makes me hate that scene so much more.

'Seeing Red' reminded all of us, Spike and Buffy included, that Spike was still a soulless vampire, capable of killing Buffy if she breathed wrong. Or attempting to, anyway. It forced everyone to come to terms with their actions, forced Buffy to be a better mother, Xander to be a better friend, and Spike to be a better man, which he ultimately became.

Again, disagree to an extent. It reminded all of us that he had a fundamental error and needed a serious, serious change. But do I think he was capable of actually killing Buffy? I don't think so. The attack was from a completely different place, and in Spike's twisted mind, he wasn't doing it to hurt her. He was doing it out of a selfish need to have her accept him, and also out of a so-called need to make her accept herself"”although that last part I just take as an excuse.

I agree that it forced all of them to come to terms with everything, and in that sense it helped all of their character developments. But I don't think it "proved" Spike was a bad man, or at least one beyond redemption. It was a realization that if he didn't change, he would never complete the metamorphosis he had begun upon falling in love with Buffy.

I don't hold Spike to any standards. Yes, he got himself a soul because he wanted to be the man he thought Buffy deserved, but I don't think 'Seeing Red' or the AR should be disregarded when people are talking about Spike and the Spuffy relationship, which so many people seem to do. Spike fans like to point out that Spike didn't have a soul when 'Seeing Red' took place, so he shouldn't be held accountable for his actions. But then in the same breath they're saying that Spike was a changed man by the time S6 rolled around, he was considered able to look after Dawn alone, he fought with the Scoobies, he found a way to be good. They can't have it both ways.

It should never be disregarded, but I don't think you can blame that on the fans as much as the writers. The AR was a cheap plot device, and they used it to suit their purposes. But beyond showing how guilty and horrified Spike felt about it, they didn't seem to want to address the issue again.

I don't excuse Spike for the things he's done, and I wouldn't want anyone to. I always viewed him as a better man than he was generally thought to be, and I always believed in him. He was a changed man in S6. But that doesn't mean he still didn't have a lot more changes to make.
 
Wishing Oceans
Wishing Oceans
[No message]
I just don't understand why fans can't forgive Spike for what he did without a soul, yet they have no trouble forgiving Angel for what he did as Angelus. Angelus did some awful things, but those don't ruin his character for me at all. Just like Spike's AR doesn't make me feel less for him. I just don't get it! I don't mean to single you out here NIX, but why does the AR make you like Spike less because of it? What about Angel? Do you like Angel less because his alter-ego killed Jenny? Somehow I think not.

I supose because killing people is an accepted part of vampire life so when they kill its not as much of a suprise on their character. I was shocked at Jenny's kill as I forgot Joss liked to kill off good characters.

If Joss had made Angelus step up and try to rape someone I would have lost the same amount of feelings towards him as I did for Spike. I'm not saying I hate Spike, don't get me wrong. I just loved him less for the AR. As I explained i'm probably a bit sensative on the subject.
 
I do appreciate it's an incredibly sensitive subject matter.

There are two ways of looking at this. From a personal emotional perspective and from a clinical perspective.

I think with Spike and Spuffy, it's more personal and as I've said, the lines are less defined with Spuffy. Angelus and Buffy were mostly seen as enemies and he was seen as the villain. However Spike's familiarity with Buffy and even the Scoobies makes his actions seem more shocking especially after he's professed to love her at every opportunity. When we let our guard down and somene hurts us, it makes their actions appear more emotionally damaging.

Being clincal however, there is no difference between Angelus' actions and Spike's. In fact the actual difference is that with Spike's actions there was little malice and it certainly wasn't an act of sadism or power.

Honestly, it was a disturbing scene but it doesn't make me like Spike any less.
 
If Joss had made Angelus step up and try to rape someone I would have lost the same amount of feelings towards him as I did for Spike. I'm not saying I hate Spike, don't get me wrong. I just loved him less for the AR. As I explained i'm probably a bit sensative on the subject.

But Angelus did rape, at least once, and almost certainly more times than that. He not only drained Holtz's wife, but it was at least implied that he raped her. "She kept repeatin' on me. But then, I repeated on her as well," at least to me sounds like rape in addition to feeding. Also, there was a scene when Angelus was telling some very reluctant maid how they would be "...as quiet as church mice," once again suggesting that he had more in mind for her than just a quick meal.

Spike said that he had been "all about the kill," which in no way guarantees that he never raped any innocent young happy meal on legs before or instead of feeding on her, but the fact that he remained faithful to Dru for well over a century, despite her not being faithful to him in return, is a pretty good argument against it. Angelus, by Angel's own admission, did things far more vile than simple murder, and I have no doubt that Darla not only permitted and expected it, but also encouraged him raping at least some of his victims. I got the distinct feeling that watching him do it was almost as great an aphredesiac to her as Slayer's blood was to Spike.

Angelus loved to torture his victims, he seemed to relish it far more than most other vampires who we saw long enough to know anything about, and rape would no doubt be included under the category of what he considered torture and humiliation. That in no way excuses what Spike did, but, realistically, we have to admit that Angelus did the same thing, and probably far more times. The main difference between the two vampires in this instance is that there was never an entire episode of either series in which the central theme was Angelus raping, or attempting to rape, someone.
 
T
thevikingsgirl
I can't imagine this was something Angelus never did.
Flannen
Flannen
Unfortunately this is all implied and suggested. If Angel/us had been seen doing this in the same way as Spike did then it would be the same. But it's easier to be less affected by what is implied and not shown.
E
EveryNiteISaveU
You always make the greatest points, WA. I appreciate all your posts.
Isn't it at least implied in Spike's case, too, that he did indeed rape at least some of his victims? I can't qive you the exact quote or ep off the top of my head, but he definitely mentioned to Buffy some time in S7 (during his time under the First's trigger) "if you knew the things I did to girls of Dawn's age". That can't be just feed and kill, because then, duh! It's like totally obvious, dude... So I've always understood that bit as being about some kind of sexual torture.
 
T
thevikingsgirl
I thought it was implied too.
U
ubi4soft
he was trying to convince Buffy to kill him
Kana
Kana
I would imagine so. My point in the other thread is that both Angelus and Spike have probably done worse.
Killing slowly and torture yes, but he was trying to convince Buffy to kill him so I don't know how much credibility to put for that statement. Spike, even in his soulless state wasn't much into torture (that was Angelus style), in WML Drusilla tortured Angel, he hired Marcus to torture Angel for the Gem of Amara, he was into the kill and fight and never look back (the conversation in Damage). But if he considered necessary, Spike used torture (the doctor - "draw out various liquids and a name" - when searching for Fred/Illyria).

As for rape he didn't need it if he wanted some female company we saw him in action seducing Sheila in School Hard, his line to Willow "I hate being obvious. All fang-y and "rrrr!" Takes the mystery out. " (The Initiative). Even Angel said to Fred (AtS S5) that Spike could be very charming, not to mention his "nice skirt" to Harmony. And I think this is another reason why the AR is so important to him, breaking him down and seeking for his soul.

I hate the AR scene with passion, for the artistic filming, the long drag out Buffy crying helpless victim, the false messages transmitted: you get raped if you don't fight back, only monsters do the rape thing, humans don't (please tell me if you heard of a rapist redeeming himself by cutting off his balls). It was a necessary turning point for Spike, which is you know a fictional character, but didn't make me like him less.
 
Kana
Kana
Yeah, although I think Spike did torture people, I doubt he was focused on it like Angelus was. Spike=NOT A SADIST
Back
Top Bottom