It's great that people are protesting for women's rights. But it's the right thing for the wrong reason.
Or, at least, an obviously biased news media is portraying him to be that way.
I would challenge those protesters to actually give one (real) example of Trump being a racist - and I would bet they couldn't do it, but they'll still call him one. The problem with the biased media is that people just believe what they report without looking at the facts behind it. That and the blatant fearmongering that's going on, like this is the end of the world and all freedoms are suddenly going to be abolished.
People who let an agenda get in the way of facts are untrustworthy.
Like Obama? lol
He has already spread hate and divided people in a way that Clinton never would.
This I call bs on - the Obama administration divided people as a matter of policy. There is no indication that Clinton would have done any different - they thrive on division.
Mr Trick said:
No he probably doesn't have anymore power than any other President except unlike like BO he does have a house who are share his parties view point.
When Obama became president the Democrats controlled Congress.
And lets not forget when it was all said and done Clinton actually got more votes, and was the popular choice.
That's not how it works here. Our system takes into account ALL the people, not just those in the big cities.
having someone in the White House just because his name isn't Clinton is far from ideal😉
It's not ideal, but there's a reason people didn't want Clinton in the White House. And it's not because she's a woman.
You have to remember that Trump was born into money, and has been shown to be a crupt business man a number of times. Nowadays its easier than ever to be celebrity and to rip people off, and make money.
Let's not pretend Hilary isn't a millionaire. She was involved in corrupt business practices before her husband even entered the White House. She's had a string of positions she wasn't qualified for, and made a mess of them. As for being a celebrity and ripping people off, how about using your foundation's money to pay for your daughter's wedding?
Mr Trick said:
Oh and I think Obama did a good job overall as President to answer one of your other comments. You have to remember that he had his hands tied behind his backs a lot of his time.
So then he just did whatever he wanted via unlawful Executive Orders...
Because Clinton would have not discriminated against someone because of their gender or their place of birth etc...
Why not? Because she's a woman? She most certainly would discriminate - this is the woman who actually advocated (against her president husband's policy) moving the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Who was vehemently against gay marriage. Just because she's a woman and/or a Democrat that does not make her a good person.
Being a pig is not the same thing as discrimination. And I challenge most men to say they've never made a lewd comment about a woman. Or women to say they've never made a lewd comment about a man. And being practical about the issues our country faces does not make someone a racist. They may be bad ideas, but they aren't racist.
But in reality, we have bigger problems than this. Social issues are not what's going to be important for the next four years. Trump is not going to be worrying about that. He's going to look at the economy and security. Which is what we need.
And the problem with what you said is that Trump actually benefited from the media. It was him using them more than the other way around. It was Clinton who suffered at the hands of a sexist media.
LOL. I'm sorry, but, the media is not sexist. Trump used the bad publicity the media was giving him to his advantage, but that doesn't mean they were biased for him. The media frickin' fed debate questions to Clinton ahead of time.
Whats this about the abortion stuff thats making all the people on the childfree facebook groups freak out? Somehow intertwined with all this? As I understood abortion is not illegal, just not funded now? I do care, but not enough to spend energy researching something I cant do anything about, so anyone get me up to date?
Abortion is legal, but every time a Republican comes into office people think they will somehow suddenly make it illegal. There are two issues. First, Republicans in Congress want to prevent patients on government-sponsored insurance (Medicaid) from using it to pay for treatment at Planned Parenthood. The real impetus behind the recent push for this is evidence of misconduct by Planned Parenthood (both Republicans and Democrats have issues with PP). Second, what Trump has just done is cut of funding to foreign pro-abortion organizations like International Planned Parenthood (except in cases of rape, incest etc). Which is something that has existed in the past and kind of flip flopped President to President, we had it during Reagan and the Bushes but not during Clinton or Obama.
Personally, I'm against "defunding it" here - they provide a lot of low cost preventative healthcare services to those who couldn't otherwise afford it (not abortions). Technically if Obamacare worked, people shouldn't NEED to go to Planned Parenthood, but that's not how it's worked out. I honestly don't know enough about what these organizations do overseas to judge whether it's worth US dollars or not. I sort of feel like the money would be better spent on contraception awareness, schooling for girls, things like that. But maybe that's part of it.