if Angel can actually come up with an excuse for slaughtering thousands of Slayers and Buffy actually forgives him for everything... well, the man should be made into President, if he can put a spin on that and make everyone forgive him, then he's almost certainly got the world domination shtick in the bag
M
if Angel can actually come up with an excuse for slaughtering thousands of Slayers and Buffy actually forgives him for everything... well, the man should be made into President, if he can put a spin on that and make everyone forgive him, then he's almost certainly got the world domination shtick in the bag
M
But, see, that's the irony of this whole discussion. HE WON'T HAVE TO COME UP WITH ANY KIND OF EXCUSE. Buffy will do it for him, and will defend and protect him from all of her friends, just like she did with Spike in Season 7, right down to the "If you try anything, he will kill you. And the thing is, I'll let him."
Buffy has a blind spot where Angel is concerned, and she always has had. Some people might call that undying love and devotion, but I call it irresponsibility and the remnants of that famous Slayer Death Wish that Spike warned her about. This isn't about love, or devotion. No intuitive soul mate insight into the tortured heart of a champion. It's just plain obsession. In Buffy's eyes, Angel can do no unforgivable wrong. End of discussion,
I highly doubt she'd forgive any of those people except Dawn. They can do anything else but kill Giles. That's Giles. As much as I hate him, Buffy loved him. He was a father figure to her... Her adult male role model. The closet thing she had to a father past the age of 15. It was he who helped her and carried her through her transition from childhood to adulthood. It was he who was there to help after her mother died and after she got back from heaven. It was he who watched out for her, protected her, and loved her all those years. I can see Buffy telling Willow, Xander, or Spike "get away from me and don't ever come back or so help me god I will kill you" if any of them killed Giles.Kean said:Buffy will forgive Angel the same way she would if it had been Willow, Xander, Spike or Dawn's hands that broke Giles' neck.
I highly doubt she'd forgive any of those people except Dawn. They can do anything else but kill Giles. That's Giles. As much as I hate him, Buffy loved him. He was a father figure to her... Her adult male role model. The closet thing she had to a father past the age of 15. It was he who helped her and carried her through her transition from childhood to adulthood. It was he who was there to help after her mother died and after she got back from heaven. It was he who watched out for her, protected her, and loved her all those years. I can see Buffy telling Willow, Xander, or Spike "get away from me and don't ever come back or so help me god I will kill you" if any of them killed Giles.
Angel willingly allowed Twilight to control his body, resulting in the death of THOUSANDS of Slayers, plus however military personnel might have gotten killed at the same time.
And since Faith referred to Angel as "The man bitch formerly known as Angel" in Issue #36, I'm guessing that she isn't on Angel's bandwagon anymore.
Spike? That would be a real chuckle-fest.
The reason Buffy will support Angel, as much as she can anyway, is because she is complicit in this tragedy and it is not within her nature to shuck the blame.
And just for devils advocate here... even if Buffy does forgive him, Xander most certainly wont...
Giles was the only worthwhile father figure in Xander's life, the man who stood by him through everything... we know Xander's parents were drunks at best, abusive at worst, and Giles was the only older man that Xander looked up to in high school and beyond...
taking that into account, and the fact that he's always hated Angel anyway, shouldn't really be much of a stretch to see Xander dusting Angel very quickly... hell, the rest of the scoobies will probably cheer him on and throw a party for the occasion as Xander kept his promise.. he said way back in season 1 (or 2?) that he was going to be there when Angel died... it's about time he made good on that i think
M
OMG, I'm becoming increasing worried about Angel now. I haven't read said issue yet but WTF?!!! Angel was always a flawed hero, that's why I liked him. The mistakes he made in the past were always understandable.
Angel being a 'puppet' to the PTBs didn't undermine his intentions. Angel didn't blindly follow orders, he used the visions for the purpose of his mission (lest we forget, Spike thought he was doing the same).
The W&H was never a real moral decision but although he is responsible for that, decision, he did what he did out of love for Connor. So while it was ill-advised, he wasn't really a jerk for doing it.
But now???? What the hell is going on? I'm not too familiar with the comics but how much was Angel in control of his actions? This is important for me because as people are saying, it would be OOC. How much he is being manipulated is crucial because this what his culpability hinges on. Is it like Jasmine and Cordy because I don't hold Cordy at all responsible for Jasmine's actions. If there is no other explanation than Angel acting on warped form of Utilitarianism, then I'm done with the verse, because they would have destroyed my favourite character.
OMG, I'm becoming increasing worried about Angel now. I haven't read said issue yet but WTF?!!! Angel was always a flawed hero, that's why I liked him. The mistakes he made in the past were always understandable.
Angel being a 'puppet' to the PTBs didn't undermine his intentions. Angel didn't blindly follow orders, he used the visions for the purpose of his mission (lest we forget, Spike thought he was doing the same).
The W&H was never a real moral decision but although he is responsible for that, decision, he did what he did out of love for Connor. So while it was ill-advised, he wasn't really a jerk for doing it.
But now???? What the hell is going on? I'm not too familiar with the comics but how much was Angel in control of his actions? This is important for me because as people are saying, it would be OOC. How much he is being manipulated is crucial because this what his culpability hinges on. Is it like Jasmine and Cordy because I don't hold Cordy at all responsible for Jasmine's actions. If there is no other explanation than Angel acting on warped form of Utilitarianism, then I'm done with the verse, because they would have destroyed my favourite character.
So, from reading that could one conclude that if Angel had not killed Giles then Buffy would have never smashed the egg and saved the world?Whistler tells him that he has seen what happens if Buffy and Angel don't go Twilight and basically says the world ends.
So, from reading that could one conclude that if Angel had not killed Giles then Buffy would have never smashed the egg and saved the world?
NO! I don't care if he was possessed or whatever. He's so manipulated and OOC. He's never good whenever he comes back to BtVS.
Yeah, but it isn't his fault. Reserve your dislike and reproaches for the writers.
JOSS for me is unforgiveable, being his CO-creator (I think Greenwalt had a major understanding of Angel) and Scott Allie knowing nothing (for his own admission) of AtS.
So, why condemn the character and not who have written him so badly?
ha ha...funnyI agree absolutely! Let's get up a necktie party and go out a'huntin' the mangy varmint.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkUFv0xbdrw
(Not that Joss is near the man Gary Cooper was, of course)