AndrewCrossett
Satsu Otaku
Thing is... all of those 206 Slayers whose deaths Angel oversaw had people in their lives who were just as devastated by their deaths as Buffy and the Scoobies are by the death of Giles. So did the soldiers he sent to die pointless deaths at the hands of those goddesses in Tibet. As Scott Allie has assured us, he was under Twilight's influence at that time, but he was in charge of his own actions.
Back when we were all arguing whether the "greater good" excused his actions, I said I hoped we got to a point in the story when someone we know and care about had to die for that same "greater good," and we could see how we all felt about it then. And that's what happened. Giles died for the same reason all those others did... so that this world would end and Twilight would replace it.
Angel may have thought he was doing the right thing, but guess what? So has every other "killer with a cause" in world history, from the Crusaders and the Spanish Inquisition to Adolf Hitler, Charles Manson and Osama bin Laden. Certain actions are inherently evil, regardless of the excuses behind them. The killing of innocents is one of those things.
With magic gone, Angel can never become Angelus again, nor can he ever be possessed by anything. No more visions or prophecies or Powers or Jasmine or Wolfram & Hart or Twilight to manipulate him. No more curse, no more Shanshu.
He's now just another vampire, destiny-free, with his own decisions to make. The only way he can ever become a threat to the world again is through the usual non-magical way... by making bad decisions while in a position of power.
Forgiving someone should entail the condition that the person stop doing the thing he's to be forgiven for. Otherwise, it's just enabling a person to continue doing bad things with a clear conscience. Forgiving Angel now requires that he fundamentally change the way he thinks and acts. When your "redemption" causes more death and destruction than the things you're trying to be redeemed for, you need to re-assess things. Otherwise you're just a villain with a white hat.
Back when we were all arguing whether the "greater good" excused his actions, I said I hoped we got to a point in the story when someone we know and care about had to die for that same "greater good," and we could see how we all felt about it then. And that's what happened. Giles died for the same reason all those others did... so that this world would end and Twilight would replace it.
Angel may have thought he was doing the right thing, but guess what? So has every other "killer with a cause" in world history, from the Crusaders and the Spanish Inquisition to Adolf Hitler, Charles Manson and Osama bin Laden. Certain actions are inherently evil, regardless of the excuses behind them. The killing of innocents is one of those things.
With magic gone, Angel can never become Angelus again, nor can he ever be possessed by anything. No more visions or prophecies or Powers or Jasmine or Wolfram & Hart or Twilight to manipulate him. No more curse, no more Shanshu.
He's now just another vampire, destiny-free, with his own decisions to make. The only way he can ever become a threat to the world again is through the usual non-magical way... by making bad decisions while in a position of power.
Forgiving someone should entail the condition that the person stop doing the thing he's to be forgiven for. Otherwise, it's just enabling a person to continue doing bad things with a clear conscience. Forgiving Angel now requires that he fundamentally change the way he thinks and acts. When your "redemption" causes more death and destruction than the things you're trying to be redeemed for, you need to re-assess things. Otherwise you're just a villain with a white hat.
Z
zobothehobo
[No message]