EvilWillow
Scooby
Why did Buffy all of a sudden go from a vapid shallow girly girl to a deep and caring about other type girl? This always bugged me because she just all of a sudden changed with no explanation.
Like [MENTION=10582]brinkster130[/MENTION] pointed out, we don't know how much depth she used to have. From The Origin comics, from what I remember, she was a bit of a bitch, but that doesn't mean she wasn't also a caring person.
Why think she changed? Other that she went from a normal girl to a warrior that is.
Like [MENTION=10582]brinkster130[/MENTION] pointed out, we don't know how much depth she used to have. From The Origin comics, from what I remember, she was a bit of a bitch, but that doesn't mean she wasn't also a caring person.
In season 1 all she cared about was dates, friends and fun.
She argued with Giles about going with him for an important mission to stop something very dangerous, because she had a date.
Dates? She had one date in season one and she cared enough about slaying to patrol every night.
She argued with him because it was based on some random vague prophecy and the first tiem they went to the cemetery nothing happened. If Buffy were sure there was a real danger she wouldn't have thought about going on a date instead.
Fact is, even if she patrolled every night (because she had to, she had no choice) she'd rather go out on dates and have fun, she still wanted out of her mission and this burden and be a normal girl.
Are you saying Giles is always wrong about this stuff?
Yes, so? Do you think that anyone saddled with a job they hate, which is supposed to kill them in a few years at best would not want out? Buffy did the job, that's what matters. This has nothing to do with maturity, everyone in their right mind would have wanted out.
No, I am saying Giles isn't infallible and neither are prophecies. Not to mention that Buffy did go with Giles the first time and the second time Giles's new lead (car crash --> must be vampires) was so completely implausible that it only turned to be genuine because it's a TV show.
[MENTION=8557]Skytteflickan88[/MENTION] agrees: You'll have to explain, how was she shown to be a non-caring person in those flashbacks? Or worse than Cordelia in any way?
Buffy was shirking. In Reptile Boy she lied to Giles so she could go to a college party, after she met a boy. Is that mature?
Buffy went with Giles the first time because Giles made her, and she walked away. I know she walked away because nothing happened, but that goes to show how much she wanted out of there and go to her date.
The second time Giles tried to convince her again to come with him, but she told him she had a date again because the first time didn't happen. She wasn't gonna go AGAIN, because of a date AGAIN.
"Where were you when I got over Tyler? He would have to crawl on his hands and knees to get me to go to the dance with him. Which he is doing after practice, so I'm gonna wait."
^ It is extremely selfish and shallow to makes someone crawl on their hands and knees to get your approval, especially when you are knowingly not going to give it to them any way.
Buffy wasn't shirking. She was scared. To death. It happens to plenty of mature people too. She wanted to quit after Becoming, after Empty Places and at other points in the series. Are you saying that was never really mature then? For my money, having moments of weakness when you are stuck in such tough and incredibly unfair situation is perfectly normal. As Whistler once put it It's what you do afterwards that counts. That's when you find out who you are."
So what would you have had Buffy do? Spend the night in the cemetery, despite Giles also being convinced at the time that they were on a wild goose chase? Furthermore, Giles can't "make her" do anything. She went with him because she wanted to help.
Giles can't "make her" do anything. She went with him because she wanted to help.
She would, if she didn't think Giles was just trying too hard. When it really mattered she did come to Giles's rescue and didn't go all "La-la-la, I can't hear you, I am on a date".
When it really mattered she did come to Giles's rescue and didn't go all "La-la-la, I can't hear you, I am on a date".
I seriously doubt she meant that literally. I don't think she was that sadistic. Grovel yes, crawling, no. I assumed there would just be playful begging.
I seriously doubt she meant that literally. I don't think she was that sadistic. Grovel yes, crawling, no. I assumed there would just be playful begging.
She didn't mean that literally. That's what people always say. But she did mean it non-literally. That just goes to show what her personality was like, the fact that she said something like this, even if it wasn't literally, she meant that saying literally.
I don't assume what she meant, I take what she said at face value. I doubt very seriously that she was joking with the tone of voice she was using.
I'm not saying she wasn't a bitch, I'm saying that she didn't do a 180, as the first poster said.
We'll just have to disagree about it. The Buffy we saw on the show wouldn't do something like that, and unless she got hit in the head and changed personality, she didn't mean it literally in the flashback.