Human Rights or PC gone mad?

Joined
Sep 4, 2005
Messages
6,716
Location
Existential Heaven
Reading the paper i was hit by this Headline(see below), so i read the article and its odd...so i wanted your views on it.

Cooing over babies BANNED

Hospital visitors have been banned from cooing at newborn babies - to protect the infants' human rights.
Anyone arriving at a maternity unit in West Yorkshire is warned not to stop to admire children in their cots or speak to the mothers. They are also greeted by posters featuring a doll in a cot with the slogan: 'What makes you think i want to be looked at?'
Hospital staff say thay have acted to protect the human rights of 'little people' who did not deserve to be 'prodded like tins in a supermarket' but critics say the rules are a sign of bureacracy gone mad.
The ban has been introduced at Calderdale Royal Hospital in Halifax.
Neonatal manager Debbie Lawson said: 'We know most people cannot resist cooing over new babies but we need to respect the child.
Cooing should be a thing of the past because these are little people with the same rights as you or me. We often get visitors wandering over to peer into cots but people sometimes touch or talk about the baby like they would if they were examining tins in a supermarket, and that should not happen. 'every patient has a right to privacy and dignaty, and we say that includes tiny babies as well.'
But Halifax MP Linda Riordan said: 'All mothers want people to admire their babies because all babies are beautiful.'
The National Childbirth Trust added: 'The hospital needs to treat mothers as grown-ups.'
Later, the hospital said the ban was also an attempt to curb infections.



Ok....what are your views?
 
It's wrong to coo at babies now?I can't believe all the laws people are coming up with.I mean I kinda get the thing where babies aren't a tin in a supermarket but when people coo it means they think the baby is cute.

OT:Welcome back DDLM🙂
 
E
Edmund Blackadder
hey up mate....yes im back and i should have my next Fic part posted tonight
Wow, that is pretty ridiculous. I mean, I could understand them not wanting people getting too close to or touching the babies, since they catch infections easily, but you can't even stop and look at them! Crazy.
 
Whoa! Weird, wild stuff. One effect of the PC phenomenon, I think, is the anthropomorphization (say that five times fast!) of animals"”treating them like people. And also, treating every living human like an adult. Getting little kids involved in politics, going to rallies, etc. Or parents wanting to be their kid's "best friend". Basically, just breaking down traditional roles in some attempt to achieve "equality". I think that's often unhealthy and even potentially destructive to children. Another PC proclivity just a general obsession with protecting everyone's feelings.

As far as no more baby cooing, that's just odd. If they could prove babies are traumatized in some way...isn't viewing human faces, expressions, a critical early phase of human development? I'd think it would be good to have the stimulation. I guess the thought is that it's somehow "degrading".

I suppose if they're being physically handled, it could be a health issue, but...cooing? I guess everything can be overdone...seems like the UK is catching up with the US in the PC department. The tide has actually started to turn away from this kind of thinking in the States, I think.
 
That was stupid. And there excuse was stupid also.
They put babies in a room that is viewable in the hall but your not allowed in there unless you are one of the parents. So how are the babies going to get sick?
 
"Little people." What are the babies, midgets? 😀 (not that I have anything against them.)

Babies have to have human interaction. There was a study done in Russia at an orphanage several years ago where they divided the babies into two groups. One group of babies got an almost over-abundance of attention, being held, fed by nurses, talked too, interacted with. The second group were simply provided with enough care to keep them alive, much of it with as little human interaction as possible. By the time they were in elementary school, group one had average to above average intelligence, able to work and communicate with others and very socially outgoing. The second group, were below average to even retarded (with the exception of one or two average ones) all were socially conscious and had many learning disabilities.

I think the law is kinda stupid, but that's there choice...
 
Babies need attention. They thrive on it. How else would they develop into human beings who show compassion for others.

It's a bogus rule.
 
Total madness IMO...though I have to say that the phrase "PC gone mad" tends to make the old conservative loony detector twitch a little - it's something I associate with the UK right-wing press I'm afraid, so I suspect if the article quoted comes from the Daily Mail or Daily Express it will have been spun to the right out of all proportion from a thing about preventing babies from catching any colds etc. Anyway, babies like being looked at and cooed over - the little egomaniacs 😉
 
Hahaha...PC gone mad...lol i was mimicking Alan Partridge...sorry.

But surprisingly i didnt find the article in the Daily Mail....it was from the unbiased(HA yeah) Metro....i was on a bus....
 
Back
Top Bottom