I remember how america would not get involved because it wasnt there war. Until Japan attacked, America wanted no involvment even though britain was being bombed by the luftwaffe constantly, the germans were waltzing across europe. . Records show that Roosevelt had no intention of a war in europe even after the pearl harbour attacks. It wasnt until germany under pressure from the japanese reluctantly declared war on america. There is no doubt that America helped change the outcome of the war, but did they come to our aid? no, it was a revenge attack. And to say america saved France twice shows obvious lack in understanding of the first world war. America launched one major offensive throughout the entire war. France, britain and russia launched tens of hundreds throughout what wa spossibly the most brutal decrepid horrid war, resulting in the highest number of deaths in any war of which the french and russians were a huge majority. It is common knowledge to any person who has read in to the world wars that France was not the country that needed saving it was the world and the millions of British, french russian, italian, american, ANZAC, canadian men and women who died fighting or were murdered deserve more credit than what american films and people like nerd4hire give them. A lot of Americans need to learn more from books and history, than films and TV.
And should iraq be attacked? Difficult one to answer, Sadam is evil, may or may not have weapons of mass destruciton ( i dont pay any attention to colin powell). Will he use the weapons against america? obviously he would, because all that would happen is the UN,USA, britain, france etc etc would wipe him and his country out, so it makes perfect sense to use them. Sadam has to go but an attack on iraq will leave thousands of civillians dead, and will give more ammuntion for osama and others to rally people for the cause.
