I'm curious. Besides from personal taste how would one decide which show is better than another? I do it all the time and I make a huge distinction between what I think is "good" and what's entertaining/enjoyable. What are we using to measure quality if it's isn't "I like it = It's good. I don't like it = it's bad"?
That's all we have, isn't it? Our opinions. No matter how much logic one uses to convince another person that our franchise is better, it's ultimately up to them to see if the argument sways them or changes their stance, regardless of how much sense it makes to us.
I wonder if Twilight fans would say the same about those finding Buffy to be way better. Everyone that disagrees with "me" is obviously wrong...
That's how it is. You believe in something because you belive it's right; ergo, the other person, who disagrees, must be wrong. People say that just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they're wrong, and that's so very nice and tolerant, but humans are not objective creatures. We have preferences. We love things because they subscribe to our own beliefs, that they support what we say, that they're right.
This topic reminds me of a video I saw on Youtube, under the user 'bigthink'. Watch the whole thing, if you can.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpNRw7snmGM&feature=relmfu"]Why Tolerance Is Condescending - YouTube[/ame]