It ISN'T a debate if NO evidence is brought to the TABLE.
JUSTbecause its true that SOMETIMES love is boiling underneat SOME relationships born from hate, dislike, lust and aggression DOES NOT mean it happens everytime.
YOU try being all insightful and 'philosophical' but in essence you are being moronic, because while you want us to look at something ISNT'T there YOU neglect the mant many MANY bits of HARD FACTUAL EVIDENCE....
Rather then TRY to spurt all this inasne and ridiculus 'Darla and Angelus' BS, BRING, like i and others have on other boards, IRREFUTABLE proof.
JUST because your mind is open to a possibility DOES NOT MEAN, when all said and done, ITS there.
YOU try to make people seem close minded because they refuse to see what is there, when infact YOU are the one is is close minded because you IGNORE the...ohh whats that word..ohh yeah....FACTS!
Anyway moving on. It is difficult to know when one is in love. You could spend most of your life with someone and not realize that in love with that person.
Angel and Darla was together for over hundred years. They killed together. Yes. They caused mayhem together. Yes. But was that all to their relationship.
AND you could spend an ETERNITY with someone and realise you DON'T love someone....
Spike and Angelus/Angel had the same type of relationship yet i dont think they loved each other.....
Geez man, not only get with the programme...watch it!.
Yes he killed her in the bronze but you could see in his face that didn't want to. He hadn't acknowledge in any way feelings for Buffy back then. So can't say was doing it for her. Darla was shooting up the place he had to stop her.
OF COURSE he wanted to, HE doesnt agonize over his decision after, he carries on with his life.
Darla WAS someone important to him, granted, she was the woman that created him, but she also unleashed Angelus onto the world, and he hated her for that. He hated that he was a Vampire.....That does NOT mean there was love there.
His feelings for Buffy don't even enter the equation, Darla was Evil, Angel Killed her....ohhh thats his pledge of eternal love for her isnt it....i missed that you fool.
Then as someone brought up you have Spike and Drusilla. Can see that the two of them were in love. However they behaved the same as Angel and Darla.
Neither Spike nor Angel wanted to admit having feelings for Buffy. Spike tried to deny and Angel was avoidy.
You keep bring Spike and Drusilla up as though its evide3nce, YOU CANNOT compare two SEPARATE love affairs on TWO different groups of people, Spike loved Drusilla, so what. HOW did Darla and Angel act the same as Spike and Dru, where is your EVIDENCE....Spike has always been the guy who worked from the heart from love, Angelus worked from a place of pain and misery.
Your point on Buffy is pointLESS.
Just because they both fell in love with the same girl, then denied those feelings FOR DIFFERENT AND JUST REASON, does not mean that they are similar beings in that fashion ergo, does nothing to prove your point on Angelus/Darla.
Now lets look at love in a different way. Xander and Cordelia. The two of them insulted each other before and after became a couple. When they first broke up Cordy denied still having feelings for him that is why Xander love spell backfired. When the two of them broke up second time for good Cordy denied that she ever had feelings for him. However was that really how she felt or was she just protecting her feelings.
Again with the 'well it worked that way for someone else SO it MUST be true for EVERYONE ON THE PLANET'....i have people i hate, argue with and there is NO chance i'd ever want to be in a loving relationship.....jeez man, could you try a different record, one that ISN't broken......
Some people fall in love with who originally couldn't stand. How does someone go from hating being around one to wanting to spend the rest of their lives together.
EXACTLY..SOME....there is NO evidence, what so evert to back up your claims that Angelus and Darla fall into the 'some' catagory.....
YOU DO NOT HAVE A POINT with this argument, no evidence, no cohesive facts, nothing.
IF you could bring THAT to the table i would not be sat here laughing at YOU now, nor the many other people who can SEE how your argument is so far beyond flawed......
Anyone else care to join, for or against, just please if you do, bring hard facts, because i will not relent, but dang this guy is using the same defence, and theres only two things i hate in this world, people who cannot see beyond there own limited mind set.....
and the Dutch...(sorry dont really hate them but its the Nigel Powers line from Goldmember....highlarious)