New Buffy Movie Official Discussion Thread #3

Last time we talked, you mentioned you were a fan of the original “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” movie.Yes, and I know they're going to make a remake. It'll be fun. I love the original, so we'll see what they decide to do to switch it up with the remake.

I think you'd make a great Buffy.Oh, thank you! I mean, who knows? I think that would be super fun, but I'm super excited just focusing on Caroline. I'm going to do one vampire at a time.

Readers, What do you think of Accola as Buffy? If a remake must happen, then she would be a pretty great choice. As Caroline, she's proven she can do be tough and vulnerable and funny all at the same time. Those sound like the qualities of a slayer.


What do you think of Candice being the new Buffy Summers? I am a huge fan of BTVS, started my vampire obsession, and to be honest i am greatly pissed they are doing a remake without Joss or any original involvment. I don't know I just think no one can measure up to the show than the actors/actresses that already played them. i will however still check it out, Probably pirated I'm not giving them any of my moeny. I have to see what they atleast come up with. i will aslo to be honest won't mind Candice playing buffy, seeing her character vamp in VD and grow up so much i think if they had to chose a new girl Candice might not do so bad. I think she could play Buffy's personality great. No i'm not saying she can be sarah's Buffy, no one will ever out beat buffy. But just like they re-did batman and many other movies that no may not have been the original but was decent, I just think Candice might not be a bad choice, i like he and believe she can play the part decent enough 🙂
What's your thoughts?
 
haha cain't go back and edit so I'll just add it here, sory Candice, as in Candice Accola she plays Caroline a vampire on the series The vampire Diaries. here's a pic
candice.jpg
 
I love Candice on the vampire diaries she is great and became one of my favorites. I am not trying to diss her or anything but I think she should just stay away. The way it looks now a lot of people are against it, no one can compare to Sarah she is a actress she just does it well. I don't think Candice can fill those shoes.
This could end up being a great movie but for her sake I hope Candice stays away or I guess if she wants to get in the public eye more she can take it in the end I hope if she does it works out for her.
 
Hey all - found some new articles on the new Buffy movie.

The first is an interview with writer Whit Anderson. It may be old news to some - but here's an exerpt:
"I didn't really watch much television at all, but I always watched "˜Buffy the Vampire Slayer."˜ That was the one show I would watch when I got home. I just loved this character. I was the same age as Buffy, and it was so rare to have a female lead character on TV in those days who was strong and capable and smart but also allowed to be feminine."

During its seven-season run, the beloved "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" series put some fang into high school melodrama long before "Twilight" made the undead all sparkly, and one big reason was the ability of the show's creator, Joss Whedon, to put himself in the head of his female fans. Now we'll find out if that rapport works in the other direction as the 29-year-old Anderson works on the script for a Warner Bros. feature-film "Buffy" reboot that is moving forward without Whedon.

Anderson, with a chuckle, said she was "fighting through" the script right now, but her concept has already energized some key supporters. Charles Roven, one of the producers of "Batman Begins," said his Atlas Entertainment signed on after he saw something special in Anderson's tone and story.

"Generally, I wouldn't have said, "˜Let's revive this,' but Whit's take is pretty compelling and a lot of fun, and it's interesting to see all of this reimagined. This is a completely new reboot. Tone is extremely important, and you want the audience to realize what is at stake and the peril is real, but at the same time what's going on should be fun and inviting and keep everyone engaged. It needs to be relevant to today too, and that is what Whit has found a way to do."
The second is an op/ed from ComicBookResources.com entiteld "In Defense of the New Buffy." Here's an excerpt:
...And is it really that wrong to be curious about what someone else can do with the ideas behind Buffy? The notion that monsters and demons and horror ideas can be used as stand-ins for the teenage experience is surely potent enough to stand up to multiple explorations by multiple people, and I'd be lying if I said that I wasn't interested in seeing someone who's actually been a teenage girl can bring to the whole "metaphor for teenage girldom" thing (Not to say that Joss couldn't write teenage girls well, because "“ obviously, he could "“ but still). Am I sad that it's going to be done as a reboot of something that ended less than ten years ago, and still exists in spin-offs and the hearts of fandom everywhere"¦? Well, yeah, to be honest "“ I'd much rather see a new idea than a rehash of an old one. But, to be cynical, any new idea would've just been branded a Buffy rip-off anyway, so at least this addresses the elephant in the room by"¦ co-opting said elephant.

The oddest part of the whole thing "“ The part that, I think, catches a lot of folk off-guard "“ is that Whit Anderson, writer of the new movie, is a completely unknown quantity. No-one seems to know anything about her work, her style, her anything other than what appeared in her LA Times interview, and that brings with it all kinds of feelings for many people: What makes her the person to reboot this beloved franchise? Why is she so special? (A favorite comment from a disgruntled fan commented on the fact that the LA Times piece had such a large photo of her, as if the fact that she was attractive was enough to get her the job. Sadly, that's not really the way Hollywood works, something I found out after years of expensive and ultimately useless plastic surgery). Admittedly, the fact that you can't look at previous work and pull an opinion from that makes it so much easier to assume the worst, but I'm choosing to do the opposite: I'm going to hope that the only way an unknown writer gets a major studio to back such a potential nerdbomb as a Buffy reboot is by having an astonishingly good pitch that makes it worth all the hassle and ill will from fans who'd rather see the franchise dead than done without Joss.

I could be wrong. The end result might be a terrible, terrible thing that I'll wish I could trade in for that amount of time and money back to use in similarly unproductive ways. But if that's the case, then, screw it. I'll just go to Netflix Streaming and watch "The Body" again, and think of happier times. Until then, though, I'm keeping fingers crossed and hoping that this reboot will mean more Buffy, and an introduction for all the people who never saw the show or read the comics or even knew she existed before. Once more, with feeling, you could say.
 
I haven't read that 2nd article before. Thanks.
I like the optimism in the piece. That's how I'm trying to approach it now, myself. At least until we get further news.
 
M
MRNewman
Very welcome - glad to help out!
More news on the new film. According to insiders, Joss Whedon turned down an opportunity to work on a remake. Here's an excerpt from the article:
When Buffy the Vampire Slayer creator Joss Whedon went public with apparent dismay at being cut out of the picture for a forthcoming new film, fans from London to Los Angeles took to the internet to express their ire. But matters may not have been quite as they first appeared: according to The Hollywood Reporter, Whedon turned down the chance to be involved in the project.

Citing studio insiders, the movie industry bible said yesterday that owners of the rights to the character had approached Whedon last year to see if he might be interested in working on a new film. He reportedly said he would rather concentrate on other projects. He has imminent comic book ensemble piece The Avengers on his schedule.Such a sequence of events would appear to be at odds with Whedon's public proclamations on the matter. "I always hoped that Buffy would live on even after my death. But, you know, AFTER," he told E! Online in a sardonic email after news of the Whedon-less Buffy project broke, adding: "Leave me to my pain." The film-maker is, however, known for his mischievous outbursts: not long ago he offered to buy the rights to the multi-million dollar Terminator franchise for $10,000.
 
I just think he thought 'I'm Joss Whedon, they wont do it without me'
 
I just think he thought 'I'm Joss Whedon, they wont do it without me'

Or maybe he didn't want studio involvement to ruin the movie like with the original one or maybe they had a vision he didn't agree with or maybe he simply wasn't interested if he could only use the 1992 movie as source material. No need to bash him without knowing any of the facts.

Here are a couple more:

http://www.examiner.com/fanboys-in-national/joss-whedon-passed-on-buffy

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/heat-vision/joss-whedon-passed-buffy-reboot-54834
 
Skanky Vamp
Skanky Vamp
How was that 'bashing' him... really? explain
I thought Joss passed because he felt it was too soon for a reboot. It's only been 7 years. Plus, he's working on the comics.

That last line from the Hollywood Reporter article is a trip. "Fox, distributor of the 1992 movie, had first crack, but passed, so Warners slid in, betting that Whedon or no Whedon, Buffy can still slay at the box office." It sounds like WB was set on a Buffy reboot, even without Whedon. With Harry Potter ending, I think WB feels like it needs another franchise to cash in on and fast. Ugh, this still makes me so mad.
 
I thought Joss passed because he felt it was too soon for a reboot. It's only been 7 years. Plus, he's working on the comics.

That last line from the Hollywood Reporter article is a trip. "Fox, distributor of the 1992 movie, had first crack, but passed, so Warners slid in, betting that Whedon or no Whedon, Buffy can still slay at the box office." It sounds like WB was set on a Buffy reboot, even without Whedon. With Harry Potter ending, I think WB feels like it needs another franchise to cash in on and fast. Ugh, this still makes me so mad.

Yep, Id agree with all you said there StarSlayer, I also feel that WB are so desperate for a new franchise to follow on from Harry Potter that they didnt care how they got it or how many fans it would upset. It just seems silly to me, Buffy belongs to Joss. It is his character and his brainchild. The show only went off the air 7 years ago and Joss is still writing the comics which is continuing the Buffy story (I know some aren't big fans of the comics but hey, its better than nothing right and they have big input from the creator too) so it just does not seem like the right time for this to happen. Im against the idea but still part of me is also quite intrigued to see just how it turns out and if it is good then I will hold up my hands and admit I was wrong. Time will tell I suppose..
 
S
StarSlayer
Same here. If it's good, great. I'm just very, very skeptical at this point.
Oh no. They try to draw Glee fans to watch the movie or something. And no, not my HEATHER!!

Buffy the Vampire Slayer Wants Heather Morris as Buffy

While in Nashville this past week, we had a chance to meet up with an associate of Dolly Parton's Sandollar Production Company, which recently sold the Buffy the Vampire Slayer rights to Warner Bros. for a big screen reboot. The source claims that Glee's Heather Morris has been brought up many times in regards to who will follow in Kristy Swanson and Sarah Michelle Gellar's footsteps. And now we are hearing that the actress is actively being sought to take on this highly coveted role.

While not much is known about this continuation of the franchise, we have learned that the tone will be more in step with the WB series that ran from 1997 to 2003, than it will the original 1992 feature film. The hope is to incorporate a neo-Valley Girl tone that will find this version of the character more in-line with her original Kristy Swanson incarnation, while at the same time presenting a fresh and hip take on the character for today's more sauve audiences.

The source indicates that Heather Morris's comedic timing is a perfect fit for Buffy Summers, and that her background as a dancer and a gymnast will be greatly utilized in the skill set that Buffy is supposed to have as a Slayer. In this new reboot, Buffy will no longer be in high school, but instead facing the same hardships that a lot of young college graduates have today in struggling to find a paying job and a healthy relationship. Though she plays a teenager on Glee, the 23 year-old-actress is actually the right age for this newly rebooted take on the character.

Before appearing on Glee, Morris portrayed a cheerleader in Fired Up and served as a back-up dancer for Beyoncé Knowles from 2007 to 2008 during the singer's Single Ladies tour. Right now, Heather's participation in Buffy the Vampire Slayer should only be considered a rumor.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer comes to theaters in 2012.

Source
 
Pfft noone could play Buffy! >.< And even so, they'd have to get the perfect person who resembles Buffy in some kind of way. No no to Heather Morris! Is it because of her ditzy/quirky role as Brittany they suggested her? :| Leave HeMo alone!!!! haha. I'm perfectly fine with her on Glee thank you very much. :/
 
Yep. Leave HeMo alone! I would feel so weird if she plays Buffy. I can't see anyone who can pull off Buffy except Kristen Bell. But the movie should never happen anyway. And if Heather happens to say yes, it would be like she betrays Joss because...

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aa_yUMMmCgw[/ame]
 
Yay that it's not true. 😀 But they haven't even written the script. Wow they're so ready.

Warner Bros. insiders denied rumors that Heather Morris, Glee's ditzy cheerleader Brittany, is under consideration to play Buffy Summers in the studio's big-screen reboot of Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Screenwriter Whit Anderson, via Twitter, also denied any casting rumors. "Careful what you retweet, loves. Inaccuracy can cause lots of unnecessary stress," she wrote.

When asked directly about the Morris casting rumor, first reported by sci-fi blog Blastr.com, Anderson replied: "We're not even *thinking* about casting yet. The script isn't even written!" she said in a tweet that was later deleted.

Warners also told The Hollywood Reporter that casting is not being discussed until the script is completed.

Source
 
Oh no. They try to draw Glee fans to watch the movie or something. And no, not my HEATHER!!

Ekkk. Heather doesn't have the acting chops to pull of such a character. And tbh, I'd like her to stay away from this because ultimately if she did this, it's the first role that would define her outside of "Glee"... but I'm glad it was just a rumor. Zap2it.com put together a list of their favorite alternatives, interesting to see who they chose. I can't link the article since I haven't made my 15 posts but they named Candice Accola as their favorite fit and ranked Dianna Agron second.
 
Back
Top Bottom