Reconciling IDW's "Angel" with Dark Horse's "Buffy"

[AndrewCrossett]

A work doesn't qualify as canon simply because Joss doesn't say it's not. He's *never* specifically said anything was *not* canon. By that reasoning, once again, everything legally published with the Buffy brand would automatically be canon.

 

[Kean]

Mumrik agrees: Actually, fans dropped the book because it was just plain bad not because it's not canon 😉 I would have read further if it hadn't felt so completely out of character.

You won't hear any disagreements about that from me. The second Armstrong said Angel was redeemed I checked out. It was the most blatant display of ignornace to this verse and these characters that I had ever seen.

A work doesn't qualify as canon simply because Joss doesn't say it's not. He's *never* specifically said anything was *not* canon. By that reasoning, once again, everything legally published with the Buffy brand would automatically be canon.

So you're saying what has happened post ATF is canon?

---------- Post added at 03:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:43 PM ----------

Scratch that question, I've reread what you said and I get it now. My bad 😉