Regaining Buffy's Trust

white avenger

white avenger
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
16,036
Age
78
Location
rome, georgia
WARNING: SPOILERS FOR SEASON 9 "ANGEL & FAITH"
*****************
*****************
*****************
******************
*******************
******************

Assuming that Angel does somehow, in a world without magic, manage to resurrect Giles, would you consider that enough to regain Buffy's trust or forgiveness? Or, for that matter, do you think that he ever actually lost her trust, despite what she told him after their space frolics (Issue #36 "Angel, I don't trust you. But you have my heart")

Personally, to reverse an old adage, I don't think that one " 'at a boy" can cancel out several thousand "Aw, s**ts." and it just sounds like too little, too late, but then I'm a hard headed, vindictive, vengeful old man who thinks that voluntarily taking part in the murder of a small army of Slayers and plotting to destroy the entire universe just so he and Buffy could play Adam and Eve is going to take a whole lot more than raising "Zombie Giles" (who could make a great Big Bad for Season 9, by the way, especially if he's leading an army of zombie Slayers) from the grave.
 
Should that make Buffy forgive him? Probably not.

Does loving someone make you put aside the mountain of wrong they do and harm they cause you? All too often.

Ultimately, her forgiveness is up to the writers as it could go either way.
 
brinkster130
brinkster130
[No message]
I think it depends entirely on how much she likens the whole Twilight experience to the Angelus experience. If she decides in her heart that Angel getting lost under the influence of something "out of his control," but with the "right intentions," is really just as forgivable as Angel inadvertently losing his soul, then she probably will forgive him. Granted the main difference between the two scenarios on a personal level, for Buffy, is that this time she lost a family member. So all this will depend on whether he is actually successful at resurrecting Giles. If not, the weighing of the circumstances will probably not occur.
 
I still think the person that Buffy will need to forgive this season is herself. I also think that it will only be in forgiving herself that she will be able to offer the same to Angel or at the very least move forward. She is angry with him and probably a whole lot of other emotions too but I also think she knows how much he will/does regret what he did, I don't think she would ever doubt his sincerity in that respect.

I think her guilt and anger at herself, Angel and Giles (from earlier in S8) is too complex to be able decipher how she feels about anyone-Giles, Angel or herself.
 
I still think the person that Buffy will need to forgive this season is herself. I also think that it will only be in forgiving herself that she will be able to offer the same to Angel or at the very least move forward. She is angry with him and probably a whole lot of other emotions too but I also think she knows how much he will/does regret what he did, I don't think she would ever doubt his sincerity in that respect.

I think her guilt and anger at herself, Angel and Giles (from earlier in S8) is too complex to be able decipher how she feels about anyone-Giles, Angel or herself.

I was thinking something similar.

If Giles comes back, and in a good way (I can see Buffy becoming furious and killing Angel if he brings back Giles wrong, or from Heaven), I can see Buffy forgiving herself and letting go of some of the anger, disgust or whatever she feels, towards Angel. But I don't see her trusting him again, not like before. No matter what he does, how much time that passes, or if she finds out/believes that Twilight took control of him and that he had good intentions, as described in the first issue of A&F, she might learn to rely on him, and let go of some destructive emotions towards him. But she will never forget, even if she forgives.

But I don't really know what she feels(part of why I'm excited we're starting over with season 9, hopefully getting into the characters' heads again). The glow seems to have effected her until the Seed broke(I assume), so how she behaved around Angel after they created Twilight could be untrue to how non-roofied Buffy would have felt. She could already have things to be upset about. Then add Giles death. I can't imagine what she feels. She must question how much was her, and how much of Angel it was that almost destroyed the world and caused Giles to die. Just the possibility that it actually was all Angel, and almost no Twilight, or all Buffy and almost no glow, that made all those misstakes, will probably haunt her forever.

For example, how Angel was prepared to stay in Twilight and let Buffy and her friends fight on their own. Buffy doesn't know "our" Angel, and might think that was how Angel would have acted, pre-Twilight. I know she acted all cute with him after they returned, actually being grateful that he finally decided to do the right thing, but that could have been the glow. I think the real Buffy would have been more "I can't believe it took that damn long to convince you". Atleast a bit. So one can assume that now, Buffy remembers that Angel was selfish, and thinks that Angel isn't the man she hoped he'd become, or thought he was. I mean, Buffy was suprised that he didn't even understand why she didn't want to leave her friends behind. She must have thought he hadn't made any connections at all after leaving Sunnydale, and didn't get what people would do for friends and family.

In her eyes, he might just the same vampire that stalked her in Sunnydale, being all about her, and only a little bit about doing good. So even if she forgives him somewhat, there's a also a big respect issue. I mean, how do you respect that? Someone able to fight, having God-like powers, leaving their loved one's friends, innocents, behind to die?
 
I think it depends entirely on how much she likens the whole Twilight experience to the Angelus experience. If she decides in her heart that Angel getting lost under the influence of something "out of his control," but with the "right intentions," is really just as forgivable as Angel inadvertently losing his soul, then she probably will forgive him. Granted the main difference between the two scenarios on a personal level, for Buffy, is that this time she lost a family member. So all this will depend on whether he is actually successful at resurrecting Giles. If not, the weighing of the circumstances will probably not occur.

The difference between the two situations, however, is that Buffy's actions were a contributing factor in Angel losing his soul, and in both of their defense, neither one of them had any idea that anything like that was going to happen. However, Angel, of his own free will, and aware of the results if he/Twilight was successful, took the action anyhow. And the action itself was not the action of a hero or Champion. He chose to destroy the universe for personal gain. The excuse that "Well, it would have happened anyhow, it would have just been worse if I hadn't led the evil forces" just doesn't cut it with me. Angel, not Angelus, chose to ally himself with and allowed his mind to be taken over by, a being whose goal was the destruction of all of mankind and the entire universe. He knew what that goal was and what it would involve before accepting Twilight's deal. That's going to make it a whole lot harder, if not completely impossible, for Buffy to ever forgive Angel's actions.
 
For example, how Angel was prepared to stay in Twilight and let Buffy and her friends fight on their own. Buffy doesn't know "our" Angel, and might think that was how Angel would have acted, pre-Twilight. I know she acted all cute with him after they returned, actually being grateful that he finally decided to do the right thing, but that could have been the glow. I think the real Buffy would have been more "I can't believe it took that damn long to convince you". Atleast a bit. So one can assume that now, Buffy remembers that Angel was selfish, and thinks that Angel isn't the man she hoped he'd become, or thought he was. I mean, Buffy was suprised that he didn't even understand why she didn't want to leave her friends behind. She must have thought he hadn't made any connections at all after leaving Sunnydale, and didn't get what people would do for friends and family.

In her eyes, he might just the same vampire that stalked her in Sunnydale, being all about her, and only a little bit about doing good.
But that's assuming that the writers integrate Angel's growth & storyline from both AtS and AtF, which a lot of us think that they've ignored for the most part in season 8. And I'm not sure if this season will be any better.

Comments on this post
[MENTION=8557]Skytteflickan88[/MENTION] agrees: Well, they can't ignore the TV show, and ATF was claimed canon by Joss, and is mentioned in season 9. I can't believe they just ignored that.
Some of us Angel fans think that they did indeed ignore stuff in season 8. Plus, Joss himself has even admitted that he doesn't "get" Angel. I wish they had had one of the Angel writers/producers involved in the comics (David Greenwalt for example). But I just found this quote that is quite promising from a Q&A with Christos Gage:
A: Since getting the job,have you waitched both Buffy and Angel and read season 8 and Angel :After The Fall?

I've watched all Buffy & Angel eps & read 1st 6 volumes of After The Fall
 
Last edited:
S
Skytteflickan88
Well, they can't ignore the TV show, and ATF was claimed canon by Joss, and is mentioned in season 9. I can't believe they just ignored that.
Well, they can't ignore the TV show

No? They are already ignoring parts of their own comics. Somebody asked Allie recently how come Buffy is not regarded as a terrorist any more, he said that she was never widely known as a terrorist. Then someone pointed out Spike in S8 reading a newspaper with the headline "Buffy Summers terrorist" and Allie said they had forgotten about that and well, it was more convenient for them to sweep all that under the carpet because they wanted a smaller scale story. The "raging apocalypse" in S8 somehow allowed Amy to leisurely drink coffee in Venice in the middle of it. The quality of internal consistency is not Joss it seems. The writers will ignore just about anything in order to get from point A to point B.

I can see Buffy becoming furious and killing Angel if he brings back Giles wrong, or from Heaven

I can't.

Since the whole "redemption rocks" is nowadays like motto for Joss I can totally see Buffy trusting Angel again. And let's not forget there are many a shipper who want to see that and with Joss pandering left, right and center lately he will probably throw them a bone too, sooner or later.
 
EVIL UU
EVIL UU
[No message]
For example, how Angel was prepared to stay in Twilight and let Buffy and her friends fight on their own.

More accurately, Angel was willing to stay in the Twilight universe WITH BUFFY, and watch all of her friends, and all of his own, including his own son, be destroyed along with everything else in the entire universe. And, most likely, he would have done exactly that if Buffy hadn't rejected the entire plan and chose to put the well being of others ahead of her own selfish pleasure. In point of fact, Angel only agreed to rejoin the fight once it became obvious that Buffy was going back.
 
But that's assuming that the writers integrate Angel's growth & storyline from both AtS and AtF, which a lot of us think that they've ignored for the most part in season 8. And I'm not sure if this season will be any better.


Some of us Angel fans think that they did indeed ignore stuff in season 8. Plus, Joss himself has even admitted that he doesn't "get" Angel. I wish they had had one of the Angel writers/producers involved in the comics (David Greenwalt for example). But I just found this quote that is quite promising from a Q&A with Christos Gage:

Not to argue against myself, but that Cage quote has bothered me for a while. I mean, there's just 4 volumes of ATF. I hope he knows that. Unless he simply mean the entire main series. There's also the fact that Allie said the IDW series count. So all writers should read all canon-ish IDW stories to avoid contradicting the big stuff. Feels like a minimum, so that if they do contradict stuff, they at least know it.

No? They are already ignoring parts of their own comics. Somebody asked Allie recently how come Buffy is not regarded as a terrorist any more, he said that she was never widely known as a terrorist. Then someone pointed out Spike in S8 reading a newspaper with the headline "Buffy Summers terrorist" and Allie said they had forgotten about that and well, it was more convenient for them to sweep all that under the carpet because they wanted a smaller scale story.

Don't get me started on the continuity errors in the comic that was suppose to happen before season 8, pre-slayers-are-hated-times.

Allie said they ignored it on purpose or is that what you assume? Did he just say he forgot? I could fanwank it and say that people forgot about Buffy, and maybe that's what they're going for as well, but you're right, it doesn't sit well. Maybe she'll get recognized in the season 9.

The "raging apocalypse" in S8 somehow allowed Amy to leisurely drink coffee in Venice in the middle of it. The quality of internal consistency is not Joss it seems. The writers will ignore just about anything in order to get from point A to point B.

Not sure I see the problems with Amy. The world might not have been breaking apart everywhere.

And I can't agree on that the writers will ignore everything. Somethings yes, but 5 years on TV and a entire canonized arc? I doubt that.


I can't.

Since the whole "redemption rocks" is nowadays like motto for Joss I can totally see Buffy trusting Angel again. And let's not forget there are many a shipper who want to see that and with Joss pandering left, right and center lately he will probably throw them a bone too, sooner or later.

I guess I misspoke. I mean, the writers obviously won't kill Angel. I didn't even think of that.

So erase that and it'll be;

[quotw]If Giles comes back, and in a good way (I can see Buffy becoming furious and trying to kill Angel if he brings back Giles wrong, or from Heaven, but then being stopped by one of her friends and havung a even harder time getting over what he did in season 8), I can see Buffy forgiving herself and letting go of some of the anger, disgust or whatever she feels, towards Angel.[/quote]

Joss will probably want to give Angel & Buffy some sort of closure before the series ends, that's just good storytelling. But the same kind of trust is very unlikey to be there.

---------- Post added at 01:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:29 AM ----------

More accurately, Angel was willing to stay in the Twilight universe WITH BUFFY, and watch all of her friends, and all of his own, including his own son, be destroyed along with everything else in the entire universe. And, most likely, he would have done exactly that if Buffy hadn't rejected the entire plan and chose to put the well being of others ahead of her own selfish pleasure. In point of fact, Angel only agreed to rejoin the fight once it became obvious that Buffy was going back.

You're right, I misspoke, not Buffy and her friends, just her friends.

However, I think you're wrong about him knowing the world would end. Was it ever said he knew the world had to die for Twilight to be born?

He said something about not expecting something to happen yet when he saw that Buffy's friends were fighting, and sounding unsure about what was happening(which should have made him rush to earth immediatly to check on his family and friends) but it didn't seem like he knew the world was ending. I actually recall him saying that there would always be fights or something and that they'd survive without him and Buffy.
 
VisionGirl
VisionGirl
I agree with you, I don't think he knew. I think he believed that the world would be destroyed if he did NOT go along with Twilight.
Not to argue against myself, but that Cage quote has bothered me for a while. I mean, there's just 4 volumes of ATF. I hope he knows that. Unless he simply mean the entire main series. There's also the fact that Allie said the IDW series count. So all writers should read all canon-ish IDW stories to avoid contradicting the big stuff. Feels like a minimum, so that if they do contradict stuff, they at least know it.
Yeah, he's probably including Aftermath and Last Angel in Hell- they are considered volumes 5 & 6 in the collected editions.

Joss will probably want to give Angel & Buffy some sort of closure before the series ends, that's just good storytelling. But the same kind of trust is very unlikey to be there.
Hmm, I have my doubts about this. I would like some kind of closure, heck I'd like just one conversation, I think they both need that. Although I place the blame more on Angel than Buffy, I do think they both need to talk about their part in everything. But I think we have to realize that these are comics...Joss can keep the story going forever if he wants! Think about the classic comics (Superman and SpiderMan for instance) whose stories have been told now for years, with lots of different directions taken. I don't think it bothers me as much as it bothers other Buffy fans. Then again it's different when the characters & storyline began in another medium (like TV or film) rather than originating in comic form.
 
Hmm, I have my doubts about this. I would like some kind of closure, heck I'd like just one conversation, I think they both need that. Although I place the blame more on Angel than Buffy, I do think they both need to talk about their part in everything. But I think we have to realize that these are comics...Joss can keep the story going forever if he wants! Think about the classic comics (Superman and SpiderMan for instance) whose stories have been told now for years, with lots of different directions taken. I don't think it bothers me as much as it bothers other Buffy fans. Then again it's different when the characters & storyline began in another medium (like TV or film) rather than originating in comic form.

Even if the comics span decades, I think they'll eventually give them a closure scene. You can't forget your origins, and both Buffy's and Angel's lives as champions got started for real when they meet. The writers will respect that. Of course, storytelling misstakes have been made in the past...
 
Allie said they ignored it on purpose or is that what you assume? Did he just say he forgot? I could fanwank it and say that people forgot about Buffy, and maybe that's what they're going for as well, but you're right, it doesn't sit well. Maybe she'll get recognized in the season 9.

I think it might be against the rules to quote the answer since the Q&A session was on another Buffy forum but basically Allie said that the realistic approach to Buffy being known as a terrorist - her having to hide in some remote place under a fake name - would suck from a storytelling perspective. They also forgot that she was well known as a terrorist so their excuse for her walking around free was Riley pulling some strings with his superiors. Not that so far they have bothered mentioned that detail in-story, mind you.

So basically when they can't deal with the repercussions of the previous plot developments, they ignore them. Real pros, those writers.

And I can't agree on that the writers will ignore everything. Somethings yes, but 5 years on TV and a entire canonized arc? I doubt that.

I didn't say they will ignore it for sure, just that they might ignore it if that's more convenient for them.
 
S
Skytteflickan88
[No message]
I actually recall him saying that there would always be fights or something and that they'd survive without him and Buffy.

Doesn't this sound more than a little bit selfish and callous coming from the man who obviously considers himself and Buffy to be the greatest champions in the war against the forces of Darkness? Remember what Uncle Ben told Peter Parker? "With great power comes great responsibility," and that holds just as true for vampire Slayers and champions (which Angel obviously considered himself to be) as it does for Spiderman, Superman, or any other superhero. Buffy CAN'T quit, because, as another ensouled vampire pointed out, she is "The One," whether she wants to be or not. There neither is, nor can there ever be, anything even remotely resembling retirement for Buffy. And angel even used basically the same argument about himself back in "I Will Remember You." Buffy and Angel are two warriors that cannot be spared, no matter how badly they might want to step down. Buffy knew it, and Angel should have, if he were even half the champion that he claims to be. Blame that failing on twilight's evil influence if you wish, and maybe it was Twilight's subtle ploy to remove Buffy and Angel from the final conflict. If not, if it was purely Angel's plan to set up housekeeping in Twilight Eden, then he doesn't deserve the title "champion," and barely qualifies to be considered a common hero.
 
I would like to think that Angel resurrecting Giles would do nothing more than anger Buify considering what she went through when her friends brought her back. I think Buffy has more respect for Giles than risk putting him through hell just to have him alive and with her again. I certainly don't think it would change Buffy's opinions of Angel. He still murdered Giles.
 
S
sisterofmercy
Yeah I was thinking along those lines too
I don't think bringing Giles back would do anything in terms of regaining trust or earning forgiveness. It wouldn't change anything that happened in season 8. Like [MENTION=7585]Kean[/MENTION] said, Buffy needs to figure out how to forgive herself for the part she has played before she can even begin to resolve her feelings about Angel.
 
Buffy has never forgotten what Angel did as Angelus, and I would imagine Twilight will be no exception. But, as Giles once said "Forgiveness is an act of compassion. Its not given because someone deserves it, but because they need it." I honestly don't know what's in store for these two. But I agree with Kean in that the person Buffy will struggle to forgive most is herself. As Buffy didn't understand the fallout from activating all the world's slayers, Angel didn't understand whom he was dealing with in Twilight. That isn't to say that he isn't at fault - he chose what he chose, and now the disasterous fallout is his only company. But, forgiveness isn't something synonymous with trust in Buffy's mind, I don't think. Granted her emotions have always been both her strength but also her Achilles heel, especially where Angel is concerned.
 
Joan the Vampire Slayer
Joan the Vampire Slayer
nice post. I agree.
VisionGirl
VisionGirl
[No message]
Assuming that Angel does somehow, in a world without magic, manage to resurrect Giles, would you consider that enough to regain Buffy's trust or forgiveness? Or, for that matter, do you think that he ever actually lost her trust, despite what she told him after their space frolics (Issue #36 "Angel, I don't trust you. But you have my heart")

Personally, to reverse an old adage, I don't think that one " 'at a boy" can cancel out several thousand "Aw, s**ts." and it just sounds like too little, too late, but then I'm a hard headed, vindictive, vengeful old man who thinks that voluntarily taking part in the murder of a small army of Slayers and plotting to destroy the entire universe just so he and Buffy could play Adam and Eve is going to take a whole lot more than raising "Zombie Giles" (who could make a great Big Bad for Season 9, by the way, especially if he's leading an army of zombie Slayers) from the grave.

Bringing back Giles would in no pay for what Angel has done, nor would it he sufficient to re-gain Buffy's trust. That's like saying that Warren bringing back Tara would pay for what he did to her.

Why? Exactly for the reasons you mentioned that I bolded in your second paragraph; Angel has done a lot more damage then just killing Giles. Angel can not be trusted; he is gullible and weak. Buffy doesn't trust Angel now and never has, in my opinion. She said it once back in season 1 ("I love you. I don't know if I trust you") and and then again it was re-confirmed in season 9 as you quoted above - yes, she loves, but she does not trust him.

And why should she?

But, forgiveness isn't something synonymous with trust in Buffy's mind, I don't think.

Yes, that's true. For instance, I think Buffy forgave Faith for what she did, yet it took her longer to trust her again.

As for Angel, I believe Buffy when she says she loves him - but that does not mean she forgives him or even trusts him. One day, I could see her "forgiving" him for killing Giles, but only because she'd need to for her own sanity. But trusting him is a different story.
 
Back
Top Bottom