Oh man, I wish you all could have taken that course with me. We discussed this (the appearance of Whedon girls) in great detail. No conclusion was ever fully reached, though. Everyone disagrees as to whether or not their extreme beauty takes away from the feminist message.
I personally don't think it does. Mostly because TV is TV, and EVERYONE is beautiful on TV. Its just a sad fact of life.
True. Plus to quote Amanda from Ugly Betty "pretty girls have problems too".
😛 LOL. In all seriousness, it really doesn't take away from the message at all because different
personalities are shown and I think that's something that occasionally gets neglected when portraying strong female characters.
Some movies, books, etc portray only kicka##, fighter, sexual, Lara Croft type women (subtly suggesting that more quiet, reserved Jane Austin, Emily Bronte , Tara Maclay type characters are boring or not equally strong.
Or you have movies which only have female characters that are delegated to the girlfriend, sidekick, (and, although they might be pleasant and likable, usually contribute nothing to solve the problem either intellectually or physically). Two movies I watched last weekend "Limitless" and "the Source Code" kind of suffered from this.
The thing I like about Joss' shows is he portrays different types of women, yet they are all equally strong. You can't necessarily argue that someone like Fred or Tara is a weaker
person than Buffy or Faith just because they can't take them in a physical fight. Different kinds of women will be able to relate to different types of characters. That's why I'm very reluctant to find a set standard for what young girls should look up to. We need
choices. Many of us would consider Buffy a role model, while many others would prefer Willow or Cordelia. And, while, those personality differences cause many of these women to clash (i.e. Willow and Cordelia) they are willing and able to set aside their differences to work towards a common goal (something else is often hinted that women are incapable of doing).