LadyLavinia
Scooby
While reading Jen Sonstein's (formally of ScoopMe.com)review of Season 5's "Fool For Love", I came across the following:
"Somehow, when Dru stole his soul, she left part of his heart intact. Someone needs to explain to me a Joss concept I've never really understood"”how can a vamp be so heartless, yet possess the ability to love and be loved? How can one lacking a soul experience such sensitivity?"
and;
" Thank you to the writers for totally shocking me, but I'm utterly confused! This episode left me with such warm feelings and hungry for more. But, it also reminded me of the inconsistencies of Joss-world and his vampire lore. What allows Spike the ability to still be true to his heart when he has no soul? Is it possible that one can work independently of the other? I'm not so sure if I can accept this concept. When Angelus returned, his heart seemed to harden"”there was no Angel to be seen. How is it that Spike can be such a softy? Is this another confusing element of Buffy-verse we meant to just sit back and accept?"
How many of you feel the same? That Whedon was inconsistent about a souless vampire having the ability to love? And how many of you understand what Whedon was leading to, in regard to Spike and to Buffy's view on vampires and demons, in general?
"Somehow, when Dru stole his soul, she left part of his heart intact. Someone needs to explain to me a Joss concept I've never really understood"”how can a vamp be so heartless, yet possess the ability to love and be loved? How can one lacking a soul experience such sensitivity?"
and;
" Thank you to the writers for totally shocking me, but I'm utterly confused! This episode left me with such warm feelings and hungry for more. But, it also reminded me of the inconsistencies of Joss-world and his vampire lore. What allows Spike the ability to still be true to his heart when he has no soul? Is it possible that one can work independently of the other? I'm not so sure if I can accept this concept. When Angelus returned, his heart seemed to harden"”there was no Angel to be seen. How is it that Spike can be such a softy? Is this another confusing element of Buffy-verse we meant to just sit back and accept?"
How many of you feel the same? That Whedon was inconsistent about a souless vampire having the ability to love? And how many of you understand what Whedon was leading to, in regard to Spike and to Buffy's view on vampires and demons, in general?