Was Spike A Good Man?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't want to derail the real conversation too much, so I will just say this:

I don't ever want to see another post like that one on this board. It was uncalled for, undeserved, unfair, and completely lacking in respect for a fellow member.

I think it would do for everyone to remember and make an effort not to put words in other people's mouths.

Now, let's continue with the thread.
 
BuffyElevated
BuffyElevated
[No message]
I think it cannot be argued that spike (as a human) wasn't a good man. William, was a super sensitive soul who wore his heart on his sleeve. I believe much of that was retained when a demon took residence in his body and his soul evacuated.... (MUCH MORE THAN ANGELUS) and that, he did many heroic things - with no soul - and many after fighting to the death, to get his soul back.
 
Buffy Summers
Buffy Summers
Ooh that just made me think of something to add in the other thread!
No doubt I will get a blast for this, but one thing Spike always had, whether ensouled or not, was his awareness of what was going on around him, even when others denied it. He told Buffy and Angel they would never be friends, that it would be blood screaming to work its will, and he was right, even when they couldn't see it. He told Buffy and Giles that Willow was just hanging on by a thread when Oz left and he was right, even when they deluded themselves into thinking she was doing OK. He told Willow that the Chumash indians would never listen to reason and he was right, even when she went on about how they should discuss things. And he told Riley that Buffy needed a little monster in her man, and he was right, even when Riley didn't want to believe it because it wasn't in him (and is he the most uninvolved psych major ever?).

Now let's see what that means: it always bothered me that decent men who live by an honourable code are left behind for "bad boys" who always seem like more fun. Well, they may be more fun - until the fun starts to include something the girl finds to be contrary to her own interests. Then it should become obvious that a bad boy is bad because he does bad things that stem from not considering other people at all. Yet she cannot throw him out of her life. I have seen enough cases of this in the real world that I am not surprised at the thought that Buffy would forgive Spike - she wants that monster, because most of the time he is more fun than someone with principles like Riley or for that matter, Xander.

Riley was a decent guy, even though he seemed like a cardboard cutout most of the time. He had all the physical and intellectual attributes a woman could want. But Buffy wanted a little dash of monster, and there wasn't any in him.

Xander resurrected her twice. In "The Zeppo", he proved his courage. He eventually became a respected contractor with a good financial future. He proved with Anya that he would bend over backwards to accommodate a girl's desires and quirks. But Buffy wanted a little dash of monster, and there wasn't any in him.

If you think I am playing a game of blame the victim, you are right! If women were inclined to eliminate bad boys with a "little monster in them" from consideration, there would be a bit more support for men who treat women decently. Riley eventually hooked up with Sam - a good choice. From what I understand of the comics, Buffy finally realizes Xander is there in time to see him hook up with Dawn. Another good couple.

Like the music says in "Once More with Feeling", it starts out seemingly good but comes on way too strong, just like that little dash of monster in a man will inevitably also come on way too strong. And yeah - go ahead and ask me about the things I have seen in this life. No one has a monopoly on bad times.
 
T
Tuppence
Great points about Buffy's dating inclinations. And just to add that I personally would have totally gone for Riley over Angel and Spike :-)
O
OutForAWalk
Love the analys
Riley was a decent guy, even though he seemed like a cardboard cutout most of the time. He had all the physical and intellectual attributes a woman could want. But Buffy wanted a little dash of monster, and there wasn't any in him.

I LOVE Riley and Buffy in season 4!!!! I think they have a stupendous relationship!!!

But I think, due to writing pretty much - he deteriorates in season 5. I don't think their break up had anything to do with her needing more "monster in her man" though. It's just that Riley went downhill.... for story purposes, I guess.
 
No doubt I will get a blast for this, but one thing Spike always had, whether ensouled or not, was his awareness of what was going on around him, even when others denied it. He told Buffy and Angel they would never be friends, that it would be blood screaming to work its will, and he was right, even when they couldn't see it. He told Buffy and Giles that Willow was just hanging on by a thread when Oz left and he was right, even when they deluded themselves into thinking she was doing OK. He told Willow that the Chumash indians would never listen to reason and he was right, even when she went on about how they should discuss things. And he told Riley that Buffy needed a little monster in her man, and he was right, even when Riley didn't want to believe it because it wasn't in him (and is he the most uninvolved psych major ever?).

Now let's see what that means: it always bothered me that decent men who live by an honourable code are left behind for "bad boys" who always seem like more fun. Well, they may be more fun - until the fun starts to include something the girl finds to be contrary to her own interests. Then it should become obvious that a bad boy is bad because he does bad things that stem from not considering other people at all. Yet she cannot throw him out of her life. I have seen enough cases of this in the real world that I am not surprised at the thought that Buffy would forgive Spike - she wants that monster, because most of the time he is more fun than someone with principles like Riley or for that matter, Xander.

Riley was a decent guy, even though he seemed like a cardboard cutout most of the time. He had all the physical and intellectual attributes a woman could want. But Buffy wanted a little dash of monster, and there wasn't any in him.

Xander resurrected her twice. In "The Zeppo", he proved his courage. He eventually became a respected contractor with a good financial future. He proved with Anya that he would bend over backwards to accommodate a girl's desires and quirks. But Buffy wanted a little dash of monster, and there wasn't any in him.

If you think I am playing a game of blame the victim, you are right! If women were inclined to eliminate bad boys with a "little monster in them" from consideration, there would be a bit more support for men who treat women decently. Riley eventually hooked up with Sam - a good choice. From what I understand of the comics, Buffy finally realizes Xander is there in time to see him hook up with Dawn. Another good couple.

Like the music says in "Once More with Feeling", it starts out seemingly good but comes on way too strong, just like that little dash of monster in a man will inevitably also come on way too strong. And yeah - go ahead and ask me about the things I have seen in this life. No one has a monopoly on bad times.


I do definitely agree about Spike's awareness- he was, what, with the Scoobies for just a couple of weeks and managed to find out their deepest insecurities, fears and turn them against Buffy in the ''Yoko Factor''. He delivers his awareness in an apathetic fashion, in a tough love-ish manner- ''that's what conquering nations do'' ''i may be loves bitch''. And in The Yoko Factor- with Willow, her sexuality and growing knowledge of magic- Spike refers to it as a ''phase'' yet is quite vague. Quite a master with words, and quite manipulative.

About the ''bad boys''- ehh... I am no psychiatrist, but the attraction of a typical ''bad boy''- usually comes from something other than love. There was a point when Buffy really, really loved Riley. Now with Spike, something that's not mentioned alot in Spuffy debates is that perhaps Buffy saw a tad of Angel in Spike. Angel would rather be with Buffy than Darla, as Spike would rather be with Buffy than Drusilla. Centuries old vampires, now restrained (although yes, I know there is a massive difference between having a soul and a chip)

Although Spike's treatment of Buffy throughout season 5- 6 is terrible, disgusting, beyond words, the reason why Buffy kissed him in OMWF, had sex with him in Gone and Smashed. He made her, for a couple of moments, feel wanted in the early episodes of season 6. She was also clinically depressed and none of the ''scoobies'' really understood her (that's a discussion for another thread) but something in Spike gave her kind of craving, that she needed at that time.

Also- these archetypes and categories that exist- ''nice boy'' ''bad boy'' are damaging to society, and the effects have already been noted. That nice, looking boy with great grades and returns his library books on time can be completely evil in a relationship. Say with Angel- who has a centuries history of bloodshed, has alot of enemies that are respected and plus is a vampire for crying out loud... is pretty much an ideal boyfriend. Those moments with Cordelia and Nina in Angel, no matter what you thought of either of those characters, made me happy for Angel because I believed in their love and that they made him happy (yeah I know about the curse... but c'mon, the times when Angel smiled always felt authentic to me)

It's not about whether or not you are a nice boy or a bad boy. It's how you treat your partner. That's what matters. Relationships are going to be flawed if you are going into it for something other than love- say when people say ''I love bad boys'' it could be for that sense of danger, as we could see with alot of Buffy's post- Angel relationships: Riley, for a while, was a rebound guy, but then Buffy gained clarity for a couple of months (primarily post- Goodbye Iowa), and Spike was just a disaster

To link this back to Spike... prior to Grave, he was not a good man at all. His treatment of woman in general was awful, his behavior in Dead Things is so revolting and sickening. I think his arc in season 7 was awfully written without a shred of sensitivity for the audience. Angel season 5 was an improvement, although my god... the immaturity over the Shanshu Prophecy. Without Buffy out of the picture, we did see him help bring down The Circle Of The Black Thorn. Whilst Lindsey, Wesley, Illyria and Angel were slaying and lots of bloodshed, Spike was essentially saving a baby, and acting as a temporary ''protector''. His role wasn't quite violent, imo. He could have thrown a massive hissy fit, could have done a trade with Gunn. His redemption story arc is hard to believe in though, mainly due to the awful writing present in very late season 6 and 7. Say, in ''Beneath You'' how sentimental the cross moment seems, where its just insensitive.
 
R
Robb Stark
[No message]
[MENTION=12171]Ethan Reigns[/MENTION] Sorry, I meant to say, "Love the analysis of what Buffy wants" in my comment but I accidentally pressed the wrong button on my tablet and it sent too early! Lol.
 
Now let's see what that means: it always bothered me that decent men who live by an honourable code are left behind for "bad boys" who always seem like more fun. Well, they may be more fun - until the fun starts to include something the girl finds to be contrary to her own interests [...]If you think I am playing a game of blame the victim, you are right! If women were inclined to eliminate bad boys with a "little monster in them" from consideration, there would be a bit more support for men who treat women decently.
No. Just no. Victim blaming needs to stop. It needs to stop. It is never the victim's fault if someone chooses to hurt them. It is not their fault if their partner treats them badly. It is never the victim's fault. It horrifies me that people can honestly believe otherwise.

Girls are programmed from a very young age to believe that if a guy treats you badly it means he likes you. How many of us complained to our mothers about boys teasing us or bullying us only to be told "That just means he likes you"? Books, movies and television shows glamourise the "bad boy" stereotype. Girls are manipulated into believing they have to try to "save" the bad boys. We are taught to accept verbal abuse from men. Society teaches us to accept men treating us badly. And then people try to turn around and blame us for what these guys do to us.

Stop victim blaming. It is never the victim's fault.
 
Girls are programmed from a very young age to believe that if a guy treats you badly it means he likes you. How many of us complained to our mothers about boys teasing us or bullying us only to be told "That just means he likes you"? Books, movies and television shows glamourise the "bad boy" stereotype. Girls are manipulated into believing they have to try to "save" the bad boys. We are taught to accept verbal abuse from men. Society teaches us to accept men treating us badly. And then people try to turn around and blame us for what these guys do to us.

Programmed? Manipulated? Taught? Do you have a mind of your own? Glamour is not inherent - you have to accept it for it to have any effect. Psychopaths cannot be "saved" - they are "wired wrong from the factory" and nothing will change that. Do you understand that society does not care what happens to you when you do follow its teachings? Here is the reality:

YOU GET WHAT YOU REWARD

There is a story from the Cherokee tribe (BTW Charisma Carpenter is part Cherokee on her mother's side) that goes like this:

An old Cherokee chief was teaching his grandson about life...

"A fight is going on inside me," he said to the boy.
"It is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves.

"One is evil - he is anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, self-doubt, and ego.

"The other is good - he is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith.

"This same fight is going on inside you - and inside every other person, too."

The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather,
"Which wolf will win?"

The old chief simply replied, "The one you feed."


If you want to make evil extinct, STOP FEEDING IT! You seem to understand that what society says about psychopathic men is wrong. If you understand this and still permit society to dictate what you do, then you are no longer just a victim, you are an accomplice. The way people relate to each other as children, with bullying and teasing, is not an acceptable model for the way adults should relate.

Don't expect society to care about any difficulties you run into - society will simply say, "Other people seem to be able to run their own lives to their satisfaction - it's your problem if you can't". Society is not consistent, nor does it have any interest in the inconsistency of its internal beliefs. Society never looks at itself and sees any problem with this inconsistency.

You have a free choice, just like Buffy did, to make decisions about the people you meet. Your own decisions, not society's. Buffy would have been perfectly within her rights and in fact had a mandate to terminate Spike via a stake, decapitation, sunlight, fire or holy water. She CHOSE not to. She had to live with the consequences of her choices. What would your choice have been?

BTW, we do not entertain much at our house, but we have had an interesting array of people here. One has disappeared because he is wanted on a Canada-wide warrant for murder. Another was the cousin of a famous murder victim. A girl who lived down the street from my wife when she was in school was murdered. The victims in these cases had no choice. Buffy had the choice to accept or decline the interest of Spike. The only people I could define as victims are either children who are too powerless, physically and mentally, to resist an assailant or people who are ambushed in some way that they cannot react. Women who know a particular man is a snake and let this snake into their lives anyway - no surprise when it all goes wrong, and no sympathy on my part.
 
Now let's see what that means: it always bothered me that decent men who live by an honourable code are left behind for "bad boys" who always seem like more fun. Well, they may be more fun - until the fun starts to include something the girl finds to be contrary to her own interests. Then it should become obvious that a bad boy is bad because he does bad things that stem from not considering other people at all. Yet she cannot throw him out of her life. I have seen enough cases of this in the real world that I am not surprised at the thought that Buffy would forgive Spike - she wants that monster, because most of the time he is more fun than someone with principles like Riley or for that matter, Xander.

If you think I am playing a game of blame the victim, you are right! If women were inclined to eliminate bad boys with a "little monster in them" from consideration, there would be a bit more support for men who treat women decently. Riley eventually hooked up with Sam - a good choice. From what I understand of the comics, Buffy finally realizes Xander is there in time to see him hook up with Dawn. Another good couple.

While I understand your point, I don't agree with it. This comes off very much as "Nice Guy Syndrome" to me.

There are numerous guys out there who get rejected by women for one reason or another and develop this attitude that because they're good guys or think they'd make an ideal boyfriend for a girl, then the girl "owes" them something. They often try make friends with a girl with the sole intention or expectation of it developing into a romantic relationship, and are pissed off with the girl when it doesn't happen, even though it was their expectation, and no one else's. BTVS did a perfect metaphor for that with Xander in "Prophecy Girl". The only reason he initially becomes friends with Buffy is to date her, and then when she chooses Angel over him he bitches and moans about how hard done by he is because girls like the "bad boy" (even though Angel isn't really a bad boy at all). To me, that's not cool. At all. Not too nice either.

What [MENTION=12223]EffyStonem[/MENTION] said is very correct. Characters like Spike, as awesome as they are (and don't get me wrong, I'm a very big Spike fan) portray the message to both girls and guys that being the "bad boy" is cool. In fiction, the girl almost always "saves" the "bad boy" (as Buffy does for Spike), so the bad boy is who you want. It shows guys that if you treat women like crap, they'll chase you. It demeans women, but because we see it on T.V. and the guy almost always goes home with the hot girl in the end, many continue to fall for it.

(It's interesting how Angel is pretty much the ultimate "safe" bad boy. He's a vampire. He's dark and mysterious with powers and a tortured past and he's kind of a metaphor for dating a guy out of high school while you're in it, but he's pretty much the perfect boyfriend. I mean hell, I'm about as into girls as you can get but if he got any better I might want to date him 😛)

---------- Post added at 08:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:48 PM ----------
[MENTION=12171]Ethan Reigns[/MENTION],

You're right, we absolutely do have a choice in our lives. But to say that societal influences don't play their part is stunningly naive. Everyone is different, and adapts and reacts to situations and influences in different ways. Some are weaker than us, and aren't as strong when they need to be. Does that make them "worse" than us though? No.

To not have empathy for those weaker than us is pretty cold in my eyes.
 
Programmed? Manipulated? Taught? Do you have a mind of your own? Glamour is not inherent - you have to accept it for it to have any effect. Psychopaths cannot be "saved" - they are "wired wrong from the factory" and nothing will change that. Do you understand that society does not care what happens to you when you do follow its teachings? Here is the reality:

YOU GET WHAT YOU REWARD

There is a story from the Cherokee tribe (BTW Charisma Carpenter is part Cherokee on her mother's side) that goes like this:

An old Cherokee chief was teaching his grandson about life...

"A fight is going on inside me," he said to the boy.
"It is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves.

"One is evil - he is anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, self-doubt, and ego.

"The other is good - he is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith.

"This same fight is going on inside you - and inside every other person, too."

The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather,
"Which wolf will win?"

The old chief simply replied, "The one you feed."


If you want to make evil extinct, STOP FEEDING IT! You seem to understand that what society says about psychopathic men is wrong. If you understand this and still permit society to dictate what you do, then you are no longer just a victim, you are an accomplice. The way people relate to each other as children, with bullying and teasing, is not an acceptable model for the way adults should relate.

Don't expect society to care about any difficulties you run into - society will simply say, "Other people seem to be able to run their own lives to their satisfaction - it's your problem if you can't". Society is not consistent, nor does it have any interest in the inconsistency of its internal beliefs. Society never looks at itself and sees any problem with this inconsistency.

You have a free choice, just like Buffy did, to make decisions about the people you meet. Your own decisions, not society's. Buffy would have been perfectly within her rights and in fact had a mandate to terminate Spike via a stake, decapitation, sunlight, fire or holy water. She CHOSE not to. She had to live with the consequences of her choices. What would your choice have been?
This entire post is disgusting. You have obviously internalised some poisonous and misogynistic crap over your life.

Of course women have minds of their own. But as children, as teenagers human beings are very, very impressionable. We learn from society, from the media, from literature and film. And if the stories we are constantly told/shown as young children show women and girls falling for bad boys, accepting abuse and misogyny, we grow up thinking that is normal behaviour.

Say a child grows up watching her mother being abused by her father. She will - through no fault of her own - come to think that it is normal behaviour that can be accepted. If she has watched her mother accept abuse, why shouldn't she. This is not her fault. This does not mean she does not have a mind of her own. It means she has been influenced and taught by her surroundings at a young and impressionable age.

As for choice, and what would I do. I did what Buffy did. I fell for a bad boy. I fell for him because he was sweet and funny and didn't show his bad side untill months into the relationship. Then slowly he started to verbally, physically and sexually abuse me. It was a slow, gradual process that I was too insecure and beaten down from to fight. I have spent years of my life trying to come to the terms with the fact that it wasn't my fault and that I did nothing to deserve it.

What you wrote was gross. It was disgusting. Victim blaming is appalling. You should be ashamed.

Oh, and FYI, you completely missed the point of that story. I'm just saying.
 
Folks, I know this is a heated topic but let's try and stay calm, collected, respectful (and on topic) of other members and their opinions.

Carry on 🙂
 
[MENTION=12223]EffyStonem[/MENTION] With all due respect, I have to disagree when you keep calling people out and saying they are "victim blaming." You did it to me, and I didn't respond before because I didn't want to feed the fire.

Buffy is an adult who makes conscious choices for her own life. No one in this entire discussion has EVER said that it is Buffy's fault that Spike almost raped her. No one would ever say that, because of course that wasn't her fault.

All I've seen anyone say is that Buffy made the choice to keep Spike in her life, instead of staking him. She made the choice to have a sexual relationship with him. She had the choice to help him when he got his soul in Season 7, and chose to do so. I have a lot of respect for Buffy as a character who makes her own choices and is independent enough that she never blames anyone for the choices that she makes. In my eyes, Buffy has never been and can never be a victim -- she is always a hero. I don't think she ever thought of herself as a victim either. Because of her choice in keeping Spike around because she did see the good in him, he became a hero as well towards the end of Season 7 and later in Angel, saving countless other lives.

Again, this is all subjective analysis, and how I choose to see two characters in a television show.
 
Silverspike
Silverspike
[No message]
[MENTION=12285]OutForAWalk[/MENTION] I will never stop calling people out for victim blaming or being appalled when they do. Dislike it all you want. One of society's biggest problems is silence. People are too afraid to speak up or speak out.

Oh, and furthermore, Buffy is a victim of sexual assault. Like it or not, ignore it or not, it doesn't change the truth. She is a victim. And she did absolutely nothing to deserve or cause it. The blame lays at Spike's feet and Spike's feet alone.

Additionally, the member I was replying to freely admitted they were victim-blaming. I simply called them out on how and why victim blaming is wrong.
 
O
OutForAWalk
I reread the other posts, and he did admit to victim blaming. Sorry about that.
The problem with trying to define whether Spike was a good man or not is that he is not only a fictional character (a vampire), but a character who seems to be an exception to the defined parameters of a vampire.

When he meets the Judge, the Judge states that he is contaminated by his love for Drusilla. Drusilla flirts with Angel after Spike is disabled and she finally leaves him. In Lover's Walk 3ABB08, Spike decides that he will torture Drusilla until she loves him again. This seems to be a perfectly acceptable modus operandi to him. By season 4, he gets the chip embedded and he cannot attack anyone in any form, but he finds he can still attack demons and he relishes this kind of fight, so he joins with the scoobies. By season 5, he realizes he has a crush on Buffy and he befriends Joyce and Dawn as well. He is tortured by Glory but does not give up Dawn's identity. This is the first indication that he is willing to do something against his interests because of Buffy.

In season 6, Buffy confides that she returned from from Heaven gives him the first indication of romantic interest in Once More with Feeling. Spike discovers that his chip does not prevent him from hurting Buffy and he once again becomes fascinated with being able to hurt her. This is ample warning. Buffy has a tryst with Spike followed by another when she becomes invisible in "Gone" 6ABB11 and she becomes something of a sexual predator in that episode, enjoying the freedom invisibility gives. By 6ABB13 "Dead Things", Buffy is growing worried about her own attraction to Spike. By "As you Were" 6ABB15, Spike is the demonic equivalent of a gun-runner, storing Suvolte demon eggs, we suspect more from stupidity than any devotion to the cause of evil. At this point, she breaks it off with Spike. We don't see much of Spike again until "Seeing Red" 6ABB19 where he attempts to force himself on her. He is so disgusted with himself that he leaves and goes to an African village to get back what he had. At this point, it is not clear whether he means to become a fully functional vampire again or get a soul - but what he gets is a soul.

By season 7, he is a decent guy with a soul, even though he has some lapses being controlled by the First and having to defend himself against Wood, but even there, he spares Wood. He finally becomes the champion Buffy thought he could be by the end of the series. Spike has no expectation of being back on Angel the following year, but he continues to be a worthwhile person there.

This story arc makes little sense from the standpoint of a vampire - the writing is to blame, but Joss & his writers cannot be blamed for creating a more popular story arc for a favourite character. Much as I hate to paraphrase Dr. Phil, you teach people how to treat you by what you do and how you respond to what they say and do. Buffy is a slayer. Spike is a vampire. Her duties allow for one outcome, her preference was for another. In the story, it worked out for the best. In real life, you have more of a chance of meeting a real vampire than having it work out for the best.

I agree with those who have said that the writing sends out a dangerous message that we have glorified in our society - "girls have a duty to "save" bad boys". I have watched a friend of our daughter go through problems getting rid of a former boyfriend. I knew the relationship was a problem. My wife concurred. My daughter, who is living halfway around the world, agreed. When she finally decided enough was enough, she got a restraining order and now has a new boyfriend who is welcome everywhere he goes.

[MENTION=11975]Always Bangel[/MENTION] - this is not "Nice guy syndrome". I don't believe anyone owes anyone else a relationship that is not mutually agreed on. I have been married for some time to the same person and neither of us have any intention of changing that - but that is an agreed relationship. I agree that Xander had no right to claim Buffy as "his". I was simply noting that Buffy may have been better off with Xander than oither choices she made. He did not take advantage of her in season 2's "Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered" when he had the opportunity.

[MENTION=12223]EffyStonem[/MENTION] - I think we agree on one thing - society sends toxic messages to young women and does nothing to stop similar messages that come from within a family. I am sorry to hear that you were drawn into a relationship that became toxic and I have seen this happen often enough that everyone knows someone in this situation. In the montage in "Chosen", potential slayers who have been victimized finally stop accepting their status and fight back. Once people stop accepting victim status and decide that they have equal rights to anyone else, life gets more dangerous for a while, but eventually gets better. Being a victim makes predation possible - if people chose once and for all to eliminate all psychopaths and predators from their lives, the world would be a better place.

I agree that I was insensitive in not pointing out that people are subject to society family and many never learn of any other way to react other than what they have seen. For the record, I do not think that sexual assault is ever justified, nor is any kind of coercion, sexism or intimidation.
 
R
Robb Stark
Very fair statements
Is Spike a good man? I don't know. I think that his actions prior to being souled show that he wanted to be a good man. He fell short of the mark given certain actions he did without a soul. But once he got his soul, I feel he could be a good man. He tried. He wanted to make up for the bad things he did. But I have a hard time with his actions with Principal Wood. He felt no remorse for killing his mom. I know he was a vampire and she was a slayer but I expected some remorse. Not getting that makes me wonder what kind of man Spike really was. That said, he's my favorite character and I like to see him in good lights, but I don' t really know if he was good. He wanted to be good. I think by the time he sacrificed himself for the world he was good. BUt it was a slower process than he got his soul equals he's good. I think it took some time before he actually was good...But in ATS s5 I think he was good. It's so hard to tell cauise soulless Spike was not that different from souled Spike. He just needed to be away from Buffy to find his own destiny, I think. He became good. He just needed some time.
 
My general take on what we're shown of Spike is that from the first, there was more of the man left in him than, say, in Angelus. Which may have to do with the fact that he was a gentle and caring man whereas Liam was a drunken selfish whoremonger. And it may also have to do with the nature of the demon that animated him. Aside from being far more 'human' than Angelus (remember the words of the Judge that both Spike and Drusilla 'reeked of humanity'), he also seemed more comfortable with the demon inside. After being cursed with the soul, Angel treated his demon as separate from himself and probably as a result prolonged his suffering. It's rather like a human being with DID (formerly called MPD). He puts all the impetus for evil onto Angelus, while Angel is the one who suffers and atones. He can't have any peace and growth is very slow indeed. Whereas Spike, after he gets his soul, doesn't differentiate, he is still Spike. He doesn't reject his demon, he works out an equitable balance. Which is why after a relatively short period of insanity and guilt, he manages to become a workable being.

I also maintain another difference is that Spike, like his human self, is and always has been 'love's bitch'. Love is his main animating force. He's terrible in his choices of who to love as he always loves them more deeply and purely than they love him in return but he has shown himself capable of doing truly prodigious things in the service of love. It's only in Ats Season 5 we get to see him without that animating force dominating everything, and he's able to be a good 'being' (I'm not getting caught in the semantic trap of 'man' or not) and do things selflessly for their own sake. (Like pushing Pavayne into the circle even though it means he might stay a ghost forever). Even then I think while that's not done from full-out love, it is done because he's genuinely fond of Fred. He's fond of humanity and often shown as fond of specific humans even aside from his love interest, like for example Dawn and Joyce. He still eats and drinks regularly though he has no need for it. We've seen he even still breathes without need (the drowning torture the First inflicts on him in S7). He forms friendships with many people he's with for any period of time.

In contrast Angel doesn't care for humanity in general. Until Whistler found him and gave him his quest, he largely isolated himself from humanity. He forms relationships only gradually and mostly because they are inflicted upon him. He doesn't eat(says it has no taste) and doesn't breathe unless he has to. He acts like a dry drunk, he cannot go near any of the behavior of his previous life without risking falling into darkness. (Whereas, for example, see Spike in Ats S5 who was able to torture someone for info with no ill after effects and was able to 'taste test' Cordelia without awaking blood lust).

So yes, I believe Spike is a good 'man' by the end of the shows. And I believe that, on balance, he was always a better overall being than Angel/Angelus in everything that truly matters.

((Edited to add- I loves me some Angel, I am not casting aspersions on Angel, he's a very different and fascinating character. However the plot often dumps all over Spike because Joss never cared for Spike and so I feel duty-bound to stand up for Spike's good points, cos damn few of the characters ever give Spike credit for them whereas Angel is treated like the second coming.))
 
Last edited:
My general take on what we're shown of Spike is that from the first, there was more of the man left in him than, say, in Angelus. Which may have to do with the fact that he was a gentle and caring man whereas Liam was a drunken selfish whoremonger.
Wow, wow. First of, this thread isn’t meant to compare Spike with Angel – there is an “Is Angel A Good Man Thread” if we’re wanting to discuss Angel and his actions. Secondly, we are shown very, very little of Angel and Spike when they were Liam and William. Yes, what we saw of Liam wasn’t fantastic but we do know that his father was a tyrant and it’s entirely possible that Liam’s selfishness and “whoremongering” grew from that. Additionally, while William may have been “gentle and caring”, he was also spineless, weak and overly emotional. As humans, Angel and Spike both had faults and probably both had strengths, but we are not shown enough to draw sound conclusions.

And it may also have to do with the nature of the demon that animated him. Aside from being far more 'human' than Angelus (remember the words of the Judge that both Spike and Drusilla 'reeked of humanity'), he also seemed more comfortable with the demon inside. After being cursed with the soul, Angel treated his demon as separate from himself and probably as a result prolonged his suffering. It's rather like a human being with DID (formerly called MPD). He puts all the impetus for evil onto Angelus, while Angel is the one who suffers and atones. He can't have any peace and growth is very slow indeed. Whereas Spike, after he gets his soul, doesn't differentiate, he is still Spike. He doesn't reject his demon, he works out an equitable balance. Which is why after a relatively short period of insanity and guilt, he manages to become a workable being.
This whole paragraph is confusing – you’re saying that because Angel treats the demon as separate his guilt is greater? Shouldn’t it be the other way around?

Additionally, Spike was able to function after a few months, not because he “found a balance” but because he didn’t accept or acknowledge the full weight of his guilt. Sunnydale is a very black and white place, the Scoobies are very black and white and redemption is easily earned. You don’t have a soul; you’re evil. You have a soul; you’re good. Therefore Buffy and by extention the Scoobies allow Spike to hide from his guilt and earn redemption. It’s not untill he moves to AtS – where everything is in shades of grey and redemption is rarely (if ever) truly earned – that Spike finally starts to feel the full weight of his soul and realises that there is no redemption for him (the same lesson Angel has learned slowly and harshly throughout his years in LA).

In contrast Angel doesn't care for humanity in general. Until Whistler found him and gave him his quest, he largely isolated himself from humanity.
Angel cares. Angel cares deeply, but he is so submerged in the greyness of the world that he loses faith again and again, due to the weakness and evil of the human race. Angel sees the darker side ot humanity more than any other character, and as such sometimes has to pull away. But he cares.

((Edited to add- I loves me some Angel, I am not casting aspersions on Angel, he's a very different and fascinating character. However the plot often dumps all over Spike because Joss never cared for Spike and so I feel duty-bound to stand up for Spike's good points, cos damn few of the characters ever give Spike credit for them whereas Angel is treated like the second coming.))
Um, no. Joss Whedon has had a love-affair going on with Spike ever since Spike arrived on the show. Joss practically worships Spike and the Spuffy relationship (just watch any interview where he is talking about either) to the point where he ignored responsibility and allowed Buffy to be romantically involved with someone who had sexually assaulted her.

Additionally, Spike gets a ridiculous amount of love from the fanbase (he’s the most popular character in the Buffyverse) whereas Angel is generally ignored and/or misunderstood by a vast majority of the fans.
 
R
Robb Stark
[No message]
Lyri
Lyri
[No message]
L
ladydorotea
[No message]
brinkster130
brinkster130
[No message]
thetopher
thetopher
[No message]
Joss practically worships Spike and the Spuffy relationship (just watch any interview where he is talking about either) to the point where he ignored responsibility and allowed Buffy to be romantically involved with someone who had sexually assaulted her.

Really? Have you read the comics, cos imo Whedon has a very funny way of showing this love then. 😀
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom