All the reasoning in the world will never make me believe he was interesting. The boy was annoying, the only time I liked him was season 5 when he wasn't Connor anymore. Angel spent his entire series questioning himself, his friends and his life, Connor didn't bring anything new to the table. Once Connor returned form the hell dimension we learn nothing about Angel's character that hadn't already been known. It was only when Connor was a baby that we saw another side of him.Connor got annoying but he made for an interesting character that made Angel question himself, his friends and his life.
Why you dogging on season 3 Cordy to start with?
She was the same girl just grown up.
As for season 4 - I loved her and at what point was she predictable?
She is cause of one of the greatest most twisted deaths in the show. I defy anyone to say they could have predicted Lilahs death.
Also the stuff with Connor - what?!?!
People people people please remember this wasn't Cordy.
This is exactly the same as blaming Angel for killing Jenny Calendar.
It was a great touch because it was so unsuspected and wrong and Angelus even comments on it being like Hamlet.
Ok the season 3 comment was unfair, I take that back.
As for Lilah's death, I would call it the most unecessary death on Angel. Lilah was just pure gold and a complete asset to the show. Killing her, to me was stupid.
Even more so when she wasn't used the following season. AI take over W&H and she's not involved? Madness!
Like I said I KNOW IT WASN'T CORDY! but that doesn't mean I can't have a problem with it! Like I said before I felt CC camped it up too much, I think the real Cordy was missed and as villians go she was pretty boring!
So let me ask you, was it just this storyline you hated or every single episode/storyline of Buffy and Angel that played on an already much told story?
If its the latter, why do you watch the show, if its the former don't complain about one aspect being used while others are copied numerous times too.
As Joss always said, its not what story yout telling it's about what you have to say about it. I don't understand what the show was trying to say with this arc. I would have no problem with it apart from the general ick factor associated with it if the story had a point. It seems like a fairly heavy topic to use as just a means to and ends i.e. Jasmine
Fair play, you moved on. I know I didn't. I loved this character, and I actually love the name. Its perfect in its simplicity. Like other characters in the show he was exactly what he was supposed to be and the name shows that.
So, what? Scorn not his simplicity? You liked him, I was bored to tears.
Some could argue that the Vampire story has been done to death, the Frankenstein story too, the guy who did wrong in his past seeking redemption its ALL been done before, alot doesn't mean its wrong to redo it from a different angle.
Also, I don't get your reasoning for hating the Jasmine/World peace arc.
The cynic in you must tell you that for world peace there has to be a price and some would have to consider if that price was worth paying now thats what happened here.
Angel and the group thought Utopias price was too high, so you hate it because it agrees with what you believe?
Like I said before it's about what you have to say about the story. Maybe my reasoning isn't exactly sound but Jasmine bothered me. No matter how great you tell me you think her arc was that won't change. I could burn your ears for hours about the brilliance of the Buffy/Angel love story but that wouldn't change the fact that it's not what you want to see. Same principal applies here.
I have no problem with a continuing arc, infact I love em, just not this arc.Season 4 is amazing, every step of the way. I understand that some people got bogged down by the continuing arc but me, I loved it.
C
Cordelia Chase*
I have to disagree. Killing Lilah wasnt stupid or unecessary. It was unexpected and excitng all in one!