What Film You’ve Been watching # 54

Status
Not open for further replies.
Superfire - 7/10

I know IMDB only gave it a 5.4 but it's better than that. The story revolves around differences between a water bomber pilot and his boss and that part of the story is predictable but there is a separate story of a smoke jumper who is the sole survivor. This is a long story, originally intended as a miniseries at 3.5 hours.
 
My Friday night; watched three films about killer monkeys. from worst to best:

Shakma (1991) 5/10
Definitely the weakest of the 3, although still watchable, has the unlikely scenario of a bunch of medical students LARPing around their labs late at night being stalked by an enraged medical-specimen baboon. Yes, that is the plot...and it's done better than I made it sound.
Whilst the gore effects are passable the character are thin and the pacing is overall limp, everyone is very earnest about this quite frankly ridiculous situation. The baboon is more adorable than sinister, with its poufy fur and shiny red ass, especially when you realise that the film crew made it go crazy-aggressive with the use of female baboon hormones; when its raging against a doorway in 'fury' its actually just really horny.
Actually that could be considered kinda sinister


Link (1987) 6/10 A middling film starring Elizabeth Shue and Terence Stamp is more mystery thriller than horror- although it has some horror elements with the violence- with Shue's character caretaking on a small English island looking after some 'trained' chimpanzees; one of which has more sinister motives. I liked the pacing here and the quaint English setting juxtaposed with the growing danger of the chimps- which are effing terrifying in real life- and I also liked the reveal of the professor's fate. Watch this for the cast, the build-up and the quirkiness of it all.


Monkeyshines (1988) 7/10 Actually good killer-monkey film; George Romero-directed with some effective character work, a nice slow build up of suspense and a great monkey. The plot is simple about a very angry quadriplegic and the tiny monkey that may or may not be acting on his psychotic impulses without his knowledge. Crazy stuff that was par for the course in the 80's.
The acting is meh, monkey is best-character but overall the gimmick is executed well enough for this film to be considered a...weird classic of its particular little sub-genre. I would actually recommend people go and search this out.
 
K-17 7/10

Harrison Ford is the captain of the Soviet submarine K-17 and in its first test run, a radiation leak requires the sub to be evacuated.
 
Monkeyshines (1988) 7/10 Actually good killer-monkey film; George Romero-directed with some effective character work, a nice slow build up of suspense and a great monkey. The plot is simple about a very angry quadriplegic and the tiny monkey that may or may not be acting on his psychotic impulses without his knowledge. Crazy stuff that was par for the course in the 80's.
The acting is meh, monkey is best-character but overall the gimmick is executed well enough for this film to be considered a...weird classic of its particular little sub-genre. I would actually recommend people go and search this out.

There are two reasons to watch this movie.

One: It has this peak cinematic shot

1723854989896.png

And two: It has the most hate-filled monologue in it towards the end, where the monkey is called slime, filth, and is told that it is going to be torn apart to its cute smiling face.
Post automatically merged:

Rocky 2 (1979) - 6.5/10

I'm kind of surprised you don't like this one! I love the whole idea of the brain injury, the plot of Rocky just struggling, and how Apollo wants a rematch because Rocky got all the glory. I've heard it said before that the first movie is about a man rising to the top. The second is just about a man trying to land on his feet, and I don't think there's anything more "real-world athlete" than that.
 
Mr Trick
Mr Trick
I don't know I guess because the first one's good, but a bit overrated then my score for this seems fair to me. I do find some of the real world stuff a bit naff to be honest. The purposal scene in the Zoo is a low point. Overall a solid sequel.
Borderlands - 4/10

As a fan of the source material, this film is abysmal.

As a regular moviegoer, it’s alright but falls off incredibly hard towards the end. The opening 20 minutes or so were fun, but that’s about it.
 
Last Passenger - 6/10

A doctor and his son are among a handful of people on a train in England which does not stop and appears to be gaining speed as it moves along. The passengers find that the person driving the train killed the real operator and is intent on suicide. The passengers manage to decouple the train and apply brakes and with one exception, they all get off safely. Not as bad as it sounds, the stories are slightly engrossing and the action looks good. IMDB gives it a 5.7/10 and this is realistic.
 
Alien: Romulus - 9.5/10

The only thing I didn’t love/thoroughly enjoy was a very shoehorned in callback to Ripley’s line from Aliens. You know the one.

Aside from that, this movie is frightening, tense, refreshingly creative, and a real tour de force for some up and coming actors. The actor that plays Andy, a malfunctioning android coded like an individual with special needs, was especially compelling and fantastic. I loved him from the first few minutes, and after a certain point in the film, he turns on a dime and delivers an absolutely phenomenal performance on the complete opposite side of the spectrum. The entire cast does a great job, namely main character Rain, but I felt Andy blew them all out of the water. A combination of great writing and a fantastic performance gave me the first horror movie character in awhile that I actually cared about.

It’s hard to say more without spoilers, but this movie was heavily disturbing and had some seriously eerie or frightening imagery, especially at the very end. Death scenes are brutal. The most graphic for me was a character falling victim to the Xenomorph’s trademark blood. We’ve seen it before in Aliens, but here you see entire appendages dissolve in graphic detail, and it does not hold back.

Tension is done masterfully here. There was a scene that had me on the edge of my seat, and it was a wonderful use of the woefully underutilized Facehuggers. They get a lot of time to shine here and it really felt like someone said “hey let’s do something pretty neat with these things”. There’s also further elaboration on the Xenomorph’s biology and gestation cycle, with a new “cocoon” form added to the mix that feels distinctly HR Geiger in its design. Fits in seamlessly and looks disgusting while doing it.

Speaking of looks, this thing looks GORGEOUS. Whoever did the production design nailed it. The Betamax video aesthetic, the whole grungy industrial look, that sense that everything in this universe is function over form, etc. Having been on a bit of a bender playing the 2014 Alien Isolation game, this thing feels like the set designers and costume designers played that game, watched the first two films on repeat, and then got to work. I was astonished to learn this whole thing had a budget of $80 million USD. They stretched that budget out wonderfully. Special mention should be given to the use of practical effects mixed with CGI. Things feel tangible and real, from the prototype pulse rifles (though worry not, they’re used cleverly and not just as big standard action movie fare!) to even the Xenomorph itself.

I thoroughly enjoyed the way the film managed to take elements that have been reviled in prior entries (for example, the Prometheus/Covenant bio-goo) and make them not just interesting, but downright scary. Felt like we actually used those concepts to their fullest this time around and it justified some weaker entries in the series. Resurrection in particular gets a seriously disturbing do-over and it works wonderfully here, with a late Act 3 shot sending chills down my spine.

My favorite horror movie of the year (so far). Really loving the adrenaline shots both Predator and Alien have received lately. Here’s hoping that the future of both franchises starts as strong as their latest entries.

As an aside, I feel it’s worth mentioning a specific choice made in the film. A la Tarkin from Rogue One, this film uses CGI to bring back a deceased actor. I’ve heard a great many complaints about it, and while I can see where they’re coming from, that particular choice didn’t bother me as much as others. It made sense for the movie’s time frame/setting and worked in the plot.
 
Mr Trick
Mr Trick
Fair enough, Gert ready for a rant from me though lol
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom