When Harry Met Sally

Exclusive Clip: Aly and Luke Interview

Exclusive Clip: Aly and Luke Interview

The complete clip of Alyson and Luke Perry on The Richard and Judy Show is now available

CLICK HERE
cap%2020.jpg


Source:Slayer
 
Alyson-theather orgasm scene

Alyson is coming soon

Short Clip:Fake orgasm scene

Actress Alyson Hannigan keeps the laughs coming as she rehearses a stage version of the fake orgasm scene from hit movie When Harry Met Sally.

Alyson - Willow in TV's Buffy The Vampire Slayer - plays Sally, the role made famous in the 1989 film by Meg Ryan.

Harry is played by Beverly Hills 90210 star Luke Perry in London's West End.

Will the story of a love-hate relationship between two students be a hit? The producers say: "Yes, yes, yes!"


When Harry Met Sally - the view from the West End

by The Mattster

So, tonight was the night I saw Alyson Hannigan in When Harry Met Sally at the Theatre Royal Haymarket in London's glittering West End. Although Haymarket and Piccadilly Circus are easily the least glittering bits of central London. But I digress...

The story starts outside the cinema as I poo poo my friend Sam's suggestion that her precious Alexis Denisof might show up to give his wife some support on her second night. "Of course not Sam, he's filming Angel in LA, don't be ridiculous." Five minutes later, and I swear I'm not making his up, who strolls down Haymarket and into the theatre but Alexis Denisof himself, looking very dapper, clean-shaven, very tall and grinning from ear to ear.

"Excuse me. I have to call EVERYONE I have EVER met, RIGHT now." (Cordelia, 1997)

Well colour me stunned. (Buffy, 1998. I'll stop it now.) I immediately phoned up to our friends who had foolishly already gone in and screamed "Get DOWN here NOW - it's WESLEY!!!" but soon after he popped into the stalls. Cant imagine why.

It pains me to say it, but that was the highlight of my evening. Under normal circumstances, of course, it would have been anyway but it was supposed to be a mere trifle compared to seeing Alyson on stage. Our Willow, showing off her immense talent on a royal London stage.

First, a disclaimer. This was a paid preview of the show - the real thing doesn't start till next week. It is unfair, and against theatre-going ettiquette to "review" a preview. It is of course not against the law to talk about it and this is what I'm doing here. But please take everything with a small pinch of salt as previews are a polishing of the final version.

And a second disclaimer: in the first half I had seats in the second from back row of the Gallery. This was mistake number one. Generally it doesn't matter - I've seen Les Mis a couple of times from the gods and enjoyed it no less than when I've been front row. Thing about Les Mis is, the performers use microphones, which is crucial in musicals. In plays, wearing a mic is a take it or leave it affair. And for reasons known only to themselves, Luke and Alyson left it. Which resulted in the fact that we literally couldn't hear a lot of what they were saying. Voice projection is pretty anathema to consummate screen actors and from my own days in the theatre I can attest that it is the most difficult thing. In projecting, you can end up just shouting, which dilutes anything subtle about your performance. So Luke and Alyson had to shout. And not only did that fail to increase our ability to hear them, it also spoiled their performances. I actually don't remember much about the first half as it was impossible to concentrate.

What I do remember looked like a very high school version of the play. Luke and Alyson were not bad but compared to Billy and Meg in the film, they were a poor shadow. It wasn't the performances that let this production down though. In fact, for newcomers to the stage, they both handled it remarkably well. What let it down was the bizarre staging. Never letting us forget that this was originally a film, the stage was almost minituarized to resemble a cinema screen - being wide but much shorter vertically than most stages allow. This didn't allow the actors much room for manoevure and it allowed for no imagination in the set. Sets were sparse and whitewashed, which works if your writer was Bertolt Brecht and your director Stanley Kubrick and there was absolutely no sense of place or time besides the subtitle of the year that popped up occasionally. (Which led to some excruciating "topical" continuity blunders, like the mention of Silence of the Lambs (the movie) in 1987 and a mention of The West Wing before it had even hit American screens). The music too was dull despite the talented Jamie Cullum being behind it - everything like the music, the use of the filmed segments relating the relationships of "ordinary" people and the dialogue just made you want to see the film again.

I saw the second half from the upper Circle which we sneaked into (yes, all 8 of us) for the second half and was finally able to hear what was going on. The problems described above were all still there but not so much effort was required to actually watch them, hence I relaxed into the experience and enjoyed it. The ending was very abrupt and although Luke and Alyson were good, there was none of the simmering tension the characters had in the film. Therefore, you didn't really care whether they got together or not and most of the time you were wondering why they even bothered. In the film, you knew they were right for each other all along.

By far the most telling element of the evening came at the very end, after the applause and the bows etc. People who have seen the film will remember that the final "happy couples" insert is of Harry and Sally themselves, talking about how they met and how they eventually got married. Finally, Alyson was on screen, and doing all of those little things that made Willow so adorable. THIS was where she belonged and I had a great big grin on my face all throughout the segment. It seemed like she was home. Which is not something that really bodes all that well for her theatre run but it more than restored my faith in her abilities. I think theatre, with its emphasis on movement and presence rather than facial expression and eye contact, is possibly not for Alyson whose talents certainly lie in the latter.

So, disappointing but not dire. I do advise seeing it, but I'd avoid Gallery seats like the plague - you absolutely WON'T enjoy it from there, it was almost unbearable.

A pleasant evening but all the better for seeing Wes!

Source:Thesun
 
hee hee... I saw her on Richard and Judy the other week and they were talking about this! I wanted to actually see her do it! 🙂
 
THANKY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gosh, I loved this clip, Aly is so great in it. & it's so nice what she says about England, lol, true, it's nice to SEE history, lol, since I live in a country with a huge history as well I can say that it's really great!
It took me many hours to load it, like 2 hours I think. That's long but it is worth ! + I found out (or my bro actually found out) how to save it.
Thanky so much Magui, you rock !!!
 
I am booking tickets for this fairly soon, I so want to attend. I went past the threatre just last week, and I happened to scream just seeing her name, LOL!
 
First Review for Harry Met Sally!

Why try so hard to look like a movie?

You have two options with When Harry Met Sally. You can buy the video for £5.99, watch it at home with your beloved, sharing a large bag of Butterkist's excellent toffee popcorn, and should the mood so take you, enjoy a romantic tryst afterwards.

Luke Perry and Alyson Hannigan in When Harry Met Sally

Alternatively, you can brave London's ghastly public transport or Ken's congestion charge, pay £80 for a pair of top-price tickets and watch this stage version starring a couple of American "stars" I'd never heard of. Then you can stump up another 100 quid or so for dinner, brave the drunks and beggars on the Tube, and arrive home feeling both exhausted and ripped off. As Sally memorably remarks on the subject of the number of women who fake their orgasms: "Do the math."

These days, old films are the new theatre. Where once they made movies based on successful stage shows, now the traffic is all the other way. The West End already has an instantly forgettable Thoroughly Modern Millie, with the more enticing prospect of The Producers and Mary Poppins to come. Other pictures currently being turned into stage properties include Dr Zhivago, Shrek, Legally Blonde, Get Shorty, Edward Scissorhands, The Wedding Singer, The Little Mermaid, The Color Purple, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels and Pleasantville. Will the line stretch out to the crack of doom?

You can see why theatrical producers find the prospect of old movies attractive. It saves them the slog of coming up with ideas of their own. Just as importantly, audiences seem to like what they already know. But although individual shows based on movies may prove enjoyable, the sheer scale of the phenomenon seems to me symptomatic of a commercial theatre running scared and failing to develop original products.

The saddest thing about When Harry Met Sally, intelligently adapted from Nora Ephron's sparkling screenplay by Marcy Kahan and spryly directed by Loveday Ingram, is that it tries so hard to look like a movie. The designer Ultz has come up with a long, shallow box design in minimalist white, with back-projections of snow and falling autumn leaves. Between scenes, screens cover the stage to show filmed footage of old couples talking about how they met, exactly as in the movie. There are even split-screen devices and a recorded jazzy soundtrack by Ben and Jamie Cullum. The whole thing seems strangely pointless.

Nevertheless, I mildly enjoyed the evening. As romantic movies go, When Harry Met Sally may not be in the same league as the Hollywood greats. But the story, following its likeable Manhattan characters through 13 years, from first meeting, when they find each other obnoxious, through platonic friendship, to the eventual recognition of love, is funny and touching, and Kahan wisely retains all Ephron's best gags.

In its unashamedly middlebrow way, the story also raises interesting issues, most notably the vexed question of whether men and women can ever remain "just good friends". And in the fake orgasm scene, with its great pay-off line, the stage version hits the comic heights just as confidently as the movie.

Until she starts groaning and gasping, Alyson Hannigan seems a subdued Sally, and is certainly nothing like as irresistible as Meg Ryan in the movie. But she becomes increasingly touching as the show goes on, while Luke Perry's rumpled Harry is actually rather more engaging than Billy Crystal.

The show is an agreeable enough diversion, but when romantic comedies remain so popular in the cinema, why on earth is no one writing them tailormade for the stage? I suspect there is an untapped fortune to be made.

From: http://www.slayerverse.de
 
Aww, I donno who made the comment, but c'mon, I'm sure that Aly was great, lol
I'd like to read more reviews as well, anyone know where to find them?
 
I got this one from www.slayerverse.de that usually has Buffy stuff up really quick. But I'm sure there must be more reviews somewhere. They will probably start coming out in newspapers and mags soon. Will keep an eye out.
 
Man !!! The kiddy Aly time is really over !!! 🙁
I mean, she looked for a long time like a kid, in BtVS.
She could play the 16 girl when she was already 20 or sommink, & it was totally believable.
But I just looked in this site you gave Dizzy (thanky btw) & now, she looked so womanish.
Well, I guess it's great too, but I'll miss the kiddy Willow ! lol
 
London Critics Wish Harry Hadn't Met Sally

From www.buffy.nu:

American TV stars Luke Perry and Alyson Hannigan's London theater debut was been slammed by critics for their "wooden, tiresomely" acting skills.

Beverly Hills 90210 heart-throb Perry and Buffy the Vampire Slayer beauty Hannigan have stepped into Billy Crystal and Meg Ryan's characters from the 1989 classic romance When Harry Met Sally at the West End's Theatre Royal Haymarket.

British broadsheet The Guardian's Michael Billington scathes, "The best thing about a pointless evening is Alyson Hannigan who lends Sally a bright-eyed perkiness that makes the sexual dilatoriness of Luke Perry's under-cooked Harry even more inexplicable than it is already. Two hours is a long time to spend in a theatre just for a fake orgasm."

And tabloid Daily Mail remarks, "Hannigan and Perry's television fame guarantees no proper stage technique. They both sound squeaky, act woodenly, flounce tiresomely. She resembles a diluted Jennifer Aniston, he a poor man's Robson Green.

"It's all about chemistry. Meg and Billy had it in spades. These two have half a teaspoonful between them."

London daily The Evening Standard's critic Nicholas De Jongh says, "Harry and Sally have about half an entertaining personality between them. The comedy might hit home with more passionate acting."
 
This isn't the first negative review I've read about "When Harry Met Sally." Some lowlife from Scotland wrote that his dead grandmother could've played a better Sally than Alyson. Man, these British critics have a lot of nerve for putting down Alyson Hannigan's performance! They can go to hell!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom