Revolver
Sir Douche
Buffy was the better show. It just worked better as an independent whole than Angel did. So much of what made Angel great would have been lost on you if you hadn't ever seen Buffy. This is less true the other way around. The first season of Angel relied heavily on hooking viewers who'd already seen Buffy. You had Oz, Spike, Buffy, Faith crossovers that moreless worked on their own, but were almost certainly much better appreciated by viewers of Buffy. And a lot of the backstory of Angel, Cordelia, and Wes (though to a lesser extent) had already been established on Buffy, so attempts to define these characters in early Angel were somewhat redundant. There were also A LOT of references to Buffy or things that happened on Buffy in Angel. It's true that there were some in Buffy as well (Andrew talking to some guy named Fred on the phone), but there were a lot fewer of them since none of the characters were really present for the events in LA to later reference them. Buffy also kept a more consistant cast than Angel, even if a few people did come and go throughout the show. The title character is the only one present at the beginning and the end of Angel. And then in season five, the show went back to throwing in a lot of Buffy castaways. Harmony and Spike may have both appeared in Angel prior to season five but their heavy inclusion would have to seem almost baffling to a viewer who'd never seen Buffy. Angel also seemed less clear in its mission-statement than Buffy. Buffy was all about female empowerment (okay, also entertainment). Angel started off as something of a monster-of-the-week show, evolved a bit when the gang moved to the Hyperion and Gunn joined, and then changed a great deal again when they moved to Wolfram and Hart.
Buffy wins for me. Angel did have a better finale though.
Buffy wins for me. Angel did have a better finale though.