Angelus 'got cursed with a Soul' - Angel was the result
Unsouled Spike earned himself a Soul - Souled Spike is the result.
2 sets of two different beings.
It depends on which theory we are going to use. If the soul is a very person but just the immaterial part of them then absolutely: soulled Spike didn't do anything more than Angel, the demon did. This also means that Angel shouldn't feel all that guilty for the crimes of Angelus and soulled Spike cannot claim credit for getting a soul.
If the soul is the conscience then yes Spike did earn is soul back whereas Angel didn't but it becomes difficult to discern his motivation. While I don't doubt there was a selfless element to what he did, but it does make me wonder what the conscience is and what it's function is. It cannot be the intellectual understanding of morality because we know that vampires have this. Spike's not stupid, he knows what Buffy and co would consider right and he has a history of doing what he believes was wrong. I hypothosized that humans (in the Verse) have an internal emotional pull towards certain actions. In short humans have a certain natural disposition and free will within this disposition. Although vampires retain a sense of continued consciousness and sense of identity (no matter what theory you believe, you have to admit that's true), they also take on the characteristics of most vampires as remorseless killers. Spike is no different in this respect as he showed no remorse for his past actions before he got a soul.
Just wanted to make a distinction between the different theories presented on the show.
Theory 1: Soul is the person you are and you essentially die and the demon takes your memories and body.
This is mainly supported by the WC.
Theory 2: The soul is merely a conscience.
Darla seemed to be more akin to this theory as she is perhaps the most consistent about her identity and responsibility.
I have to really disagree with all that. Just because the excuse has always been made for Angel that Angelus is completely different person than him (which is convinient) doesn't mean that Spike pre and post-soul are two completely seperate entities.
Well I don't see how there should be any metaphysical differences between them so I agree. I believe th difference between Spike and Angel(us) is purely psychological, whichever theory we use.
Angel/Angelus are night and day, wheras Spike went on a gradual path of progression, by the time he got his soul (aside from the attempted rape fiascio slip-up) he'd already managed to make most of the changes within him himself... when he got the soul the only blatant difference in his person was the actual physical presence of the soul, but Spike was still Spike.
Spike was still Spike in a way but of course, like you said he was difference. Having a soul had to make a difference otherwise it was pointless having it. I know Joss is all about the metaphor and in some cultures people actually believe the soul is earned through deeds. However metaphysically it's messy because he may as well not have had a soul because if he was able to do the 'right things for the right reasons' prior to having a conscience then, what is the soul?
My overall theory on Spike is that he did what he did for Buffy. It was partly an unconscious journey which was done for the woman he loves rather than his inherent believes in morality. Spike is self-aware but not really one to be self-reflective. If you like, he changed from the outside in, which is fine.
Many say that Angel's problem is weakness. I'd be inclined to agree in a sense. He's weak and he fails but that's why I like him. I don't think he wants the Angel/Angelus split, so perhaps it was his way of psyche dealing with the severity of what he's done without a conscience. I'd say that he has a sort of dissociative identity disorder, an ailment he has no apparent control over. Maybe this is partly conscious but knowing what we know of Angel, he wouldn't allow the people he cares about to be in danger on purpose.
I kind of like that Angel is wonderfully f**ked up. He deals with his weaknesses the best way he knows how and carries on forging his path. That is why he is a hero to me.
In season 6, the moment Spike believed he could kill, he tried.
Yes and Spike also said he would kill all of Buffy's friends if he got the chance, in Season 6, the very season of his soul getting. Whether he would have actually done it or not, is another question. Angel with a soul let the demon hold sway for a while so we cannot tell if Spike would continue down the path of killing if he lost his soul or even the chip based upon his love for Buffy and his subsequent attachments. The thing about blondie bear is that with or without a soul he forms attachments better than Angel. Whether this would have been enough? I'm not sure.
His feelings for Buffy aside (as THIS is the only thing that made him different) you cannot guarantee that he wouldn't want to kill the gang and/or anyone else.
Spike's rape attempt is not the exception to the rule that you so blatantly disregard, this was another sign of selfish and evil Vampire - one of the reasons Spike leaves for his Soul is because of his selfish want of Buffy, not because he wants to 'be a better man'. He doesn't understand the ramifications of his 'quest' and when he comes back he IS a different being.
Ah yes, you've just address the issues here. He may well have been on the journey but I wouldn't have removed the chip without his soul firmly in place. Whether he did what he did for selfish reasons, I don't know. I can appreciate the value of what he did for Buffy but I agree it wasn't to do with atonement for it's own sake, otherwise he would have shown remorse for his actions before.
We're told that the soul is the conscience, the thing that separates us from the evil of the Vampire BUT without it we're completely different people - hence not being held accountable for our actions.
I'm not sure what you mean by different, but in either case I'd agree. I don't judge soulless vampires by human standards if at all.
The attempted rape of Buffy by Spike was borne out of frustration - nothing more, nothing less - it has nothing to do with being evil or not, having or not having a soul -- the end of that scene and the attempted rape was the result of Spike not being able to cope with Buffy's constant rejection of his advances (her insecurities about dating another vamp) and the confusion that he felt because of the time that Buffy and he had spent to together.
It doesn't help matters that he isn't very reflective and sometimes doesn't really think things through. I'd agree that the AR wasn't about the typical power games that are often associated with such an act. Spike was definitely at a crossroads. He didn't have a soul but he wasn't behaving like a demon. I think this is what sparked the soul quest to a degree. He had enogh insight to realise something was amiss.
It is just like Angel said. "He wanted it more." in regards to Spike. I, again, am a huge Angel fan but I am just saying, what was that about? But then again Angel did get all fluffy and soft sitting in that Wolfram and Heart office chair for a time.......
I think Gunn had a point when he said the cup didn't really mean anything but, you're right, him not wanting it enough addressed his general malaise he was experiencing in that season. He had grown weary of the mantle of vampire with a soul while Spike was fresh to the idea of being a champion with his shiny new soul. I liked the bit with the cross, Spike takes the pain while Angel can hardly touch it. It's like's soul is burning him while Spike's is giving him strength. Compare this to a few years ago when Angel surmounts holy water and crosses for Darla.