I know, I'm not trying to say that IMDb gets to decide whether or not characters are recurring or not. I'm just saying I understand why Tara might not be in a poll like this, because she is so much more important than like all the other recurring characters (maybe with the exception for Joyce), she was in so many episodes and she feels like way more than a recurring character. That might make it a bit unfair to have her in a poll like this one.Tara was a recurring character, she never achieved full open credit regular status...because Amber didnt want it.
The fact that she is not a regular DOESNT take anything from her character, or her performance BUT she was always just a recurring character.
[...] IF in this POLL the likes of JOYCE and ANDREW are considered RECURRING then Tara MUST be considered IN THE SAME LIGHT.
she was almost never a main character in the same way as Dawn or Joyce or even Faith.
Heh, that is true, I contradicted myself there didn't I? Or not really, but I see how Joyce could be seen as recurring, since she was never one of the Scoobies, still, she was very important to Buffy, which I'm guessing gives you status in this show. Tara was only ever really important to Willow, which kept her on the outside, both in a Scoobie way and in a BtVS way.Although it is interesting to note that Joyce is catagorized as a recurring character in this poll.
"Tara achived regular character status in the ep she died. ANY character that appeared in the credits was a regular character in my mind...tara might have been in the opening sequence since S4, but her name appeared in the opening title sequence during 'Seeing Red'
Like i say, IF universally she was recognised as a regular, then i would totally go with it, BUT its pretty 50/50 depending on which site.....and for the pruposes of this thread, if the Likes of Joyce and Andrew are counted recurring, i think Tara should be there.....