BillieHunter said:
I think its wrong for you to have him as an inspiration and you think its wrong for me to think its wrong..we have our own opinions...i gave up trying to understand your side cause i never will...so go admire Hitler all you want, hun...i just dont get it...
NOOOO!
Don't give up!
See passed what the victors dictate to you. Use that innate instinct that tells you to jump off the bridge would be wrong. Do not feel, perceive.
Ignore what your heart tells you, it lies. 1 innocent murdered is no different from 12 million, because to believe there is a difference, is to condone the lesser. Death is the absolute finality to all things. Hitler had no bloodlust, no desire to kill, to hate. He killed no people. His only true crimes were ignorance and nationalism.
polexia said:
fiver: missunderstood? sure.. right.. whatever....
sure hitler is not the only man in ww2 who is responsible for the cruleness, the death and the mass murderings... but he was the man with the plan, he was the leader of it... he was able to get people who saw his point of view and liked it to help him get there i thinbk it's so crazy for you too argue that; ooo there is NO eveindence of hitler ever killing anyone himself, or that he ever gased someone personally so he is in no way responsible... only the people around him were killers, were responsible.. sure lets relive hitler from these unfair "rumors" and hear-says.
Wrong on many accounts.
First of all, do you even know what Hitler's original plan was? He wanted to unite Germany, restore its pride, and have it be the biggest power in the world. That asshole, lets go piss on his grave!
Secondly, Hitler never killed anybody, it is a fact. There is NO evidence to suggest otherwise. BUT, clearly that his people killed should all be blamed on him"¦ Lets get a witch hunt going for Bush!
Bush had a plan, to wipe out "terrorism". At least, the terrorism that he will benefit from. He initially got people to see his side of view, through silly speeches on national pride, and defending the country, and never resting until all terrorism had been wiped out. While his rhetoric is not nearly up to Hitler's standards, its still effective. Let us not forget that America has in the past funded many of these terrorist organisations. Now, for the purpose of freedom, PEACE and liberty, they will INVADE countries which they suspect are now backing terrorist organizations. UN-****ING -BELIEVABLE.
And Hitler was not the leader, in the sense that, he told them Jews were evil, lets kill them. Very much the other way about, Hitler was following the feelings of the people. In fact, it is suspected that even in power, the Nazis were more influenced by the people than the other way about. Germans wanted Jews out of Germany. Hitler followed the wishes of his people.
polexia said:
and as for the hole bridge thing.. you should read up on Milgram and his studie on ww2 and the poeple who commited grusome acts on other people. they did find some interesting things.. sure hitler didn't make any body do something they ddidn't want to or that they weren't capable to do.. so hitler is without responisbiliies.
you should read bauman also...
An American and a Polish Jew? Haha, completely objective I'm sure"¦
polexia said:
hitler might not have put a gun to another persons head.. but when you give other people orders to kill(for you) are you any less a killer yourself? or does that mean that you DON'T have blood on your hands?
Uhm, all leaders must give these orders.
Zoe: Heroes get people killed.
polexia said:
who started the notion of workcamps, genocide? who was the leader? who was running the show?
Oh, so when American soldiers were torturing Iraqis, that was a specific order from Bush? The idea of "work camps" was not started by Hitler. Hitler wanted Jews out of Germany. If I remember correctly, he wrote in Mein Kampf that he was somewhat inspired by the American ethnic cleansing of the natives. Genocide of the Jews was not decided by Hitler. Hitler wasn't even at the conference where the "final solution" was apparently decided. Any suggestion that he authorized it, or it was his decision, is a lie. (According to the facts)
polexia said:
alot of people have had to answer for what they did during the 2nd ww, so by all means hitler were not alone, but they are not in quetion here, are they?
You can't take one person, one event in history, and say there, haha, proof Hitler was the evil. Things need to be looked at in context, otherwise your opinion will be completely illogical.
polexia said:
and why do you keep coming back to america? this is not a discution/argument about the us politics!!! so your arguments on it are a bit wasted here hun. you don't even know Billih or my point of view on the us foregin politics... so...
America is vitally important to this discussion. They celebrate their genocide of the native Americans"¦ Nazi Germany is condemned for there's..
polexia said:
when you look at IMPORTANT historical people you can't just look at their will power, you got to look at what they did with it, what they achived. how they got there.... and when it comes to such important historical people as hitler you can't dismiss what he acomplished and say that you only like his ambition..
Hitler united Germany. He saw a world where Germany was the leading power. He used military force to do so. EXACTLY what America does.
polexia said:
as for your argument of mandella, well, there are people who have acomplished things that didn't get there using violence... if you think that violence is not right way to acive freedom, then thats what you think.. and then you don't admire that figure/person/leader.. but there are plenty of people who have acomplished great things without using voilence as a tactick
You clearly MISSED the point. Mandella essentially won, he's a hero. Hitler lost, he's the evil. Both used violence. There is NO difference. Numbers or methods do not matter.
polexia said:
also i just can't see how you can only find hitler admirable...
sure you can go around admiring hitler til your head blows up for all i care, but i t's not wrong for me to think its wrong for you to admire H, but i do think that's someting you should be expecting, that there are people who find that wrong, and dislike it.
And you can walk around with your head up your ass, till I pull out an ak47 and shoot you the shit up.
polexia said:
i'm not saying that you disregard houlocaust, cause i don't know where you stand on that subject.. but there are people who don't belive in it. there are people ho think its a sham! and thats scary! thats down right scary!!!! specially since there are people to day, who where there, or in some other death camp. who have seen and felt it. BTW have you ever talked to a deathcamp victim? (a person who survived it)
Never talked to a survivor, I've talked to some victims, though. They told me they were itchy. Weird. Plus, they smelled off. I told them to take a shower, but they just looked at me oddly..
polexia said:
hitler is not a saint. you might find him a gentleman, who never took a ife, who never took a soul, who never destroyed a life(or 6 mill for that matter) and you can go on admiring his ambition, his drive, his will, his "deams for a better world", and the rest of us can sit here with our "lies" of the man.
Haha, funny stuff, Polexia!
The "lies"?
Historians tell you that the Nazi government was chaotic, there was very little order, members just did what they pleased, and when questioned, replied that it was the will of Hitler. Without ever actually asking or having it authorized by Hitler. We are also told, Hitler was lazy, he woke at noon, liked to waste his time watching movies at night, had little time for details, etc etc..
So, if the Nazi party was so without order, or construct, then where the hell do the allies find all these documents specifying plans and designs by the nazis? Explicit documents on the final solution, and the extermination of so many Jews, and other minorities. If the Nazis were so without planning or actual order, why do these documents exist? Whose idea was it? Not Hitler's, he was too busy sleeping and watching movies"¦"¦"¦And if these documents truly existed in the first place, which I doubt they did, why weren't they destroyed before the Allies took Berlin? Not enough time? Please, Germany lost the war long before the Russians came beating on Berlin. All documents, should/would have been destroyed, if they ever existed.
I actually watched a programme yesterday as it happens about Nazi Germany. One German had this to say. (totally paraphrasing, but it was something like this)
"The first time I met Hitler, I was startled by the beautiful nature of the man. I thought, this is a good man, and I'm proud to have met him. I never once witnessed any of the evil he is associated with."
Dia DeLa Muerte said:
Now, my inspiration is George W. Bush.
He is the leader of a powerful nation.
Has drive and ambition.
Not afraid to attack another country to get their resources.
Declares illegal wars on nations he knows NOT powerful enough to defend themselves.
Wasn't originally the one meant for power.
And Finally people 'misunderestimate' him...."¦
I'd mentioned America a few times, becomes ultimately I was going to draw comparisons between Hitler and Bush.
Lets face it, America has always been an imperialistic country, they're just damn sneaky about it. America is a nation that is orientated towards military and political hegemony over the rest of the world, and as it is losing it's stranglehold on power, desperate actions are necessary. And the East is looking greedily on America, it wants its power, and sees America as weak.
Americans think the world revolves around them, truly believing they have the greatest country in the world. Its that sort of arrogant pride that epitomized Nazi Germany. The single member does not matter, it's the country as a whole that's important, the rest of the world be damned. We can see this from America, with simple things like, having children read the pledge of allegiance every day in school (which I find is a truly disturbing method of almost brainwashing). Or using Fox to spread pro Bush propaganda. A country where large corporations are merged with the interests of the government. All much like Mussolinis idea of fascism.
How does America maintain power over the rest of the world?
Peace keeping missions that America has engaged in have the tendency to replace local governments with pro American ones..
Bush is hypocritical, advocating a "free Market" in other nations but creating protectionist laws and barriers in America.
They are arrogant, they truly believe they can go where they want and force their beliefs on anyone. I'd like to see them invade a real nation, like China or Russia, they'd get pwned.
Dia DeLa Muerte said:
You may all have your issues, but you cannot deny the fact that Hitler was a great leader.
Quoted for truth, justice, the American way!