Who was the better villian the Turok Han or Caleb

[Vampire Slayer]

Caleb Definitely! The Turok just growl a lot and get killed with a sword/large stake/or a piece of wire in Buffy's case. Whereas Caleb couldn't be touched with a sword but had to be split in half with the Slayer Scythe! Caleb should've been in s7 from when the 1st Turok Han was introduced so he could be by the First. The Turok Han were mostly shown in about 4 to 5 episodes whereas Caleb was in about 5 episodes. I just watched Chosen and the army of Turok-Han were practically defeated easily whereas an army of Caleb; that would've been Hell in the Mouth! But Caleb was only strong because the First merged with him and gave Caleb the power. Oh well, Caleb wins, hands down!

 

[Vigeous]

It's tough to say, and I say that because they are on different levels of villainy. One one side of the spectrum, the Turok Han is your basic creepy monster who growls, is powerful and kind of disgusts you. But then on the other side there is Caleb, the tainted human. He's not as brutal and primitive as the Turok Han. Caleb is a character, he has depth. He is very malevolent while the Turok Han is your classic flesh hungry monster. Quite different.

I think they're both great, I honestly cannot decide. They both portray their villain styles so well.

 

[ElmoHasAGun]

Caleb. Celeb is just too awesome. The Turok Han is big and scary and whatever, but Celeb is just so cool. Y'know, in that evil, woman hating preist kinda way.