nerd4hire
Certified Uncloneable
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2002
- Messages
- 9,102
I was having what I thought was an interesting discussion (well, arguement really) with a friend and fellow Buffy fan.
Basically it went like this: Who's the better actress Sarah Michelle Gellar, or Alyson Hannigan?
He says Sarah Michelle Gellar, because she brought a strength of personality to the character of Buffy that makes it impossible to think of anyone else in the role.
I say Alyson Hannigan, because although Sarah is a damned good actress, she was also damned lucky to find such a well written part, that fit her like a glove. Alyson on the other hand has this amazing ability to take different characters like Willow, or Vamp Willow, or Darth Rosenber, or Michelle Flaherty, and breath their own special life into them with deftly played nuances, and below the surface understanding of the characters. I mean, I love the Buffy Bot, but it's not an example of great acting. The Alyson characters are.
I'm curious if anyone else has an opinion on the subject.
Basically it went like this: Who's the better actress Sarah Michelle Gellar, or Alyson Hannigan?
He says Sarah Michelle Gellar, because she brought a strength of personality to the character of Buffy that makes it impossible to think of anyone else in the role.
I say Alyson Hannigan, because although Sarah is a damned good actress, she was also damned lucky to find such a well written part, that fit her like a glove. Alyson on the other hand has this amazing ability to take different characters like Willow, or Vamp Willow, or Darth Rosenber, or Michelle Flaherty, and breath their own special life into them with deftly played nuances, and below the surface understanding of the characters. I mean, I love the Buffy Bot, but it's not an example of great acting. The Alyson characters are.
I'm curious if anyone else has an opinion on the subject.