I used to care about this arguement, but I really don't anymore. Nevertheless...
If fans start editing out all of the episodes where Willow says she's gay because they feel they can dismiss certain writers on the basis of quality, then the entire series becomes meaningless.
So Willow says she gay, but let's look at her actions:
1. Feelings for Oz AND Tare during New Moon Rising.
2. Attracted to Giles while he was singing in the coffee shop.
3. Attracted to Daracula.
4. Actracted to that guy in Him (Spike and Xander weren't attracted. Did it affect ALL females or just people naturally disposed to be attracted to males?)
So, if we are wrong to edit out what Willow says, then aren't we also wrong to edit out what she does?
The whole sexuality is fluid thing is something new to me. Before this board, I thought the arguement was that if you're gay, you could never be sastified with a person of the opposite sex. Like, if a gay person was married, they were never truely happy and sastisfied in the marraige because they were denying who they were.
Likewise (and this was brought up in the original post) people have a problem with Willow being gay because they assume (incorrectly or not) that that means her previous relationships were based on a lie; that she was never happy with Oz, and her feelings for Xander were unreal.