Cordelia said:
The original question was regarding if Spike was a better (more benevolent) vampire than Angel because he won his soul back rather than it being forced upon him.
Wow. That's not how I took the question at all.
😉
I guess they both suck at being vampires, since they have souls and do good deeds.
But if you're asking who is more
benevolent, not who makes a better vampire...I'd have to say neither of them. Angel was cursed with his soul and brooded for several decades and completely avoided people. He didn't do anything redemption-worthy until Whistler came along. And then he only helped people to get redemption from the powers, not because he wanted to.
Spike got his soul back for love, to be a better man (even though he isn't and never will be a man) for Buffy. Some people call that selfish, but I think love is an excellent reason to strive to be more than you are. He didn't get his soul to make Buffy love him, but to be worthy of her. But that hardly makes him more benevolent. He saved people, sure, but not just because he liked them or anything.
So neither of them are really benevolent, they both do good deeds for different, mildly selfish, reasons.
An off-topic note: Some people said that Spike wasn't as evil before he was souled, and I agree. Spike could love, while Angelus could only hate. Spke did help save the world before he was chipped or souled, while Angelus tried to destroy it. Again, Spike did it for selfish reasons, but like that big blue demon said, Spike had disgusting amounts of humanity in him. Angelus didn't. Sorry, that was really off-topic, but other people talked about it too.
😉