If Buffy dies another is called! WRONG!

Status
Not open for further replies.
eponinethen said:
Um, everyone seems to take this a lot more serious than I do, like it's a real fight between wo sides.. I guess that it is.. But I'm just trying to figure out what "really" happened, I'm not just fighting for my side... (Don't know what's wrong with me, I'm usually all about fighting, lol.)

I gotta admit this has become a little personal for me Epo.

This started because i bothered to post a little FACTUAL information on the thread topic and as a result i've been called a liar, simply because i didn't think to make a record of every single Mutant Enemy writer interview i've ever read.

In the future do me a favour and remind me not to bother to add any info, no matter how true it is, that might cause this much anguish. Really isn't worth the hassle! 🙂
 
I'll try but.. well, I guess I am too open for anything today, might be less tomorrow, lol...

I am really really thankful for all facts and info there are, believe me. I wish I was in war mood just like the two of you... It's just that I've been discussing this so many times.. and, well, I used to be on your side, arguing for Faith as the slayer so.. I'm not all at this or that side which makes arguing more interesting but also harder...
 
Wicca said:
i'll have to agree lmao. for such a big bad, it was pretty lame. if it knew so much, didn't it know how they were going to defeat it, or maybe it *let* itself be ambushed by wannabe-slayers? lmao

Hmm, for such a big Buffy fan you missed a key plot hole here.

If two slayers caused a huge disruption, then wouldn't two hundred cause a major disruption.

It is pretty believable that the First wanted Buffy to activate the potentials, thus creating an unbalanced world. Possibly giving the First the ability to become corporeal soon!

Pagan said:
The only evidence we have at all is that no new slayer was called after she died in The Gift. So if it's evidence you want that Faith was the active slayer before Chosen then that is all you get.

HAHA.

We didn't know about Kendra or Faith until they showed up.

Hell for all we know there could be a third slayer floating around.

Another theory that has been debated.

Now the preceding proves nothing, but it shows that there are HUGE flaws in your theories.

I'm still going with my theory that Buffy holds the line now because she was re-inserted into it after Bargaining.

It is highly possible that since Buffy's body and spirit were so used to being the Slayer or that even the event in "The Gift" reactivated her. Thus giving her the power to call another Slayer.

Then you have the flat lining in "Villains" which could be the disruption that caused it all.

We do not know this.

All we know is that we have key characters and the oldest evil of all time (Who is probably not an idiot as Picca believes it to be. Since ya know, it sensed the disruption and has informants and resources up the butt.) saying that Buffy would call another slayer.

And if you can not believe the script, then I guess you don't believe anything that has ever happened in the Buffyverse.

This is because the script is the only reliable source we have to go on and in the rules of debate, we would come out on top.

You have shown no source what so ever to back up your theory. With the exception of "I heard this but I forgot where I read it". Oh please.

Oh and please capitalize.
 
C
Cordelia
I <3 Comma :D
Wicca said:
and what exactly did that have to do with what i said?

If you could remove your head out of the clouds you would have seen that it was a statement made to show how the first was not an idiot, but rather just was the victim of Buffy's free will.

It's pretty funny how you don't realize that to prove a theory you have to deconstruct it piece by piece, hence why you believe that I'm going off topic. Oh and also, as far as that challenge that you don't think you have goes, I haven't seen anything from you someone here can't prove wrong or come up with a better theory for.
 
Slayer said:
It is pretty believable that the First wanted Buffy to activate the potentials, thus creating an unbalanced world. Possibly giving the First the ability to become corporeal soon!

okay.... what???
where did that come from and what did that come here for?

Slayer said:
Now the preceding proves nothing, but it shows that there are HUGE flaws in your theories.

of course. which are?

Slayer said:
And if you can not believe the script, then I guess you don't believe anything that has ever happened in the Buffyverse.

where have you been when i proved your script-theories wrong? trying to come up with this post that notonly has done nothing to prove you right but nor did it contributed anything to the conversation? (with the exception of a rather lame attempt to insult both pagan and i and if that's how you win your arguments... well, you know)

Cordelia said:
If you could remove your head out of the clouds you would have seen that it was a statement made to show how the first was not an idiot, but rather just was the victim of Buffy's free will.

It's pretty funny how you don't realize that to prove a theory you have to deconstruct it piece by piece, hence why you believe that I'm going off topic. Oh and also, as far as that challenge that you don't think you have goes, I haven't seen anything from you someone here can't prove wrong or come up with a better theory for.
well then i must have been gone when they proved me wrong.
 
Slayer said:
Hmm, for such a big Buffy fan you missed a key plot hole here.

If two slayers caused a huge disruption, then wouldn't two hundred cause a major disruption.

It is pretty believable that the First wanted Buffy to activate the potentials, thus creating an unbalanced world. Possibly giving the First the ability to become corporeal soon!



HAHA.

We didn't know about Kendra or Faith until they showed up.

Hell for all we know there could be a third slayer floating around.

Another theory that has been debated.

Now the preceding proves nothing, but it shows that there are HUGE flaws in your theories.

I'm still going with my theory that Buffy holds the line now because she was re-inserted into it after Bargaining.

It is highly possible that since Buffy's body and spirit were so used to being the Slayer or that even the event in "The Gift" reactivated her. Thus giving her the power to call another Slayer.

Then you have the flat lining in "Villains" which could be the disruption that caused it all.

We do not know this.

All we know is that we have key characters and the oldest evil of all time (Who is probably not an idiot as Picca believes it to be. Since ya know, it sensed the disruption and has informants and resources up the butt.) saying that Buffy would call another slayer.

And if you can not believe the script, then I guess you don't believe anything that has ever happened in the Buffyverse.

This is because the script is the only reliable source we have to go on and in the rules of debate, we would come out on top.

You have shown no source what so ever to back up your theory. With the exception of "I heard this but I forgot where I read it". Oh please.

Oh and please capitalize.

Whats with the HAHA thing you do every now and again? You having some kind of breakthrough here? 😉

For the last time!!!! There was no new slayer called after The Gift, Joss said so, he knows, he writes this stuff, you don't!

I don't have a personal theory for any of this, all i'm doing here is putting the alternate side to your theories up for consideration. All i have is the knowledge of what i read, which is correct regardless of anything anyone else may say here.

To paraphrase Anya, i have this thing called memory, it's useful!

Tell you what, i'll use capitalisation if you use your brain! We got a deal?

Now anyone, preferably a little more mature, got anything else because if all i'm gonna be doing is repeatin myself here time and time again i'm gonna get bored!
 
C
Cordelia
Completely uncalled for. Please read the FAQ for the rules in this posting community.
W
Wicca
possibly. but if we're going for "uncalled for" maybe you shouldn't ignore other "uncalled for" things posted by a certain someone else.
Wicca said:
where have you been when i proved your script-theories wrong? trying to come up with this post that notonly has done nothing to prove you right but nor did it contributed anything to the conversation? (with the exception of a rather lame attempt to insult both pagan and i and if that's how you win your arguments... well, you know)

If you read my post correctly I never said that you "proved my script-theories wrong". I simply stated that you did not believe the script. Read it over again.

HAHA Pagan. Like that HAHA.

"Use my brain". Well I and other members can definately tell you that I use my brain fairly often. And I think that would also be reflected on my GPA, SAT score and the plethora of schools I've already been excepted to. Hell, I'm 17 and I'm already attending a prestigious school...

Pagan, Wicca or as I like to call them Picca, since they apparently think exactly alike... answer me this:

If we can not believe the script, can we really believe articles, interviews et cetera?

And if you have read these things in other articles, please show them to me and the others, so you can prove that your so "right and smart and the debate champ!"

C'mon.
 
well if you feel the need to defend your intelligence.... 🙂

and maybe it'd help if you reread my posts. because this is the second time you misunderstood it.

and about bringing you the article - the very day you bring us all the articles you ever read, i'll do the same. maybe you think this is a game or a competitoon, but i'm not dropping to that level. now if you think you can stay on mine, we'll resume this discussion, assuming you have something that actually contributes to it.

Cordelia said:
If you're bored, no one is stopping you from leaving.
well we could, but then there'll probably be no one to disagree with you 🙂
 
Wicca said:
well if you feel the need to defend your intelligence.... 🙂

and maybe it'd help if you reread my posts. because this is the second time you misunderstood it.

and about bringing you the article - the very day you bring us all the articles you ever read, i'll do the same. maybe you think this is a game or a competitoon, but i'm not dropping to that level. now if you think you can stay on mine, we'll resume this discussion, assuming you have something that actually contributes to it.

I've never mentioned any articles, only Picca has.

And it seems like you could really help yourselves out if you showed us these "articles", but your all talk.

LOL and how did I mistake your post, since ya know I quoted it word for word. I think your the one who has mistaken other's post.
 
Oh my, the sheer stupidity is really starting to grate!

Who said you can't believe the script, you just have to use you intelligence and take into account that even the characters may not have all the answers that the writers do. The writers know all as they make it up, the characters only know what they have learned up until that point of the story. if nothing has happened to inform them within the story then they won't know, it's as simple as that.

The writers however, being real and all, get to have all the information, ain't they the lucky ones!

Congratulations on the prestigious school thing, although maybe you should start attending a few classes now. just turning up every day clearly isn't helping much!

As for the articles, look for yourself, they are there, particularly the fact that Joss said no new slayer was called after Buffy's second (or third) death. As for the Fury article, which i made very clear right from the start, it being in a magazine would make a link practically impossible, wouldn't you say?

I already know i'm right, Maria already know i'm right, i care about nobody else, therefore as far as i'm concerned debate won! Go us!
 
Okay - I suggest you all end the little digs at each other right now. There is no reason the facets of this issue cannot be discussed without insulting other people's intelligence or illusions of grandeur.

I don't want to see anything other than constructive discussion from this point on in this thread.
 
Wicca said:
well we could, but then there'll probably be no one to disagree with you

You obviously don't know me that well to have made that statement. 😀

Ahh...the thread is almost up to a 100 posts...how sad.... 🙂
 
I think on that note since we're close enough to 100 posts, it's time to close this thread.

Please feel free to start a new thread on this discussion if all parties can avoid personal attacks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom