New Joss Whedon Project: Much Ado About Nothing

I might be a sore "loser" fan... But I don't know why or how and I don't care... All I know is James Marsters isn't a part of this and I'm pissed. If there's one thing anyone who claims to be a fan of James should know, it's that he's OBSESSED with Shakespeare. It's ridiculous to me that Joss would do a Shakespeare adaptation and not have James involved. Shakespeare night at Joss' during Buffy... was kind of run by James. and I've heard it was his idea, but don't quote me on that. Bottom line as far as people who have worked with Joss being Shakespearean actors/qualified to do something like this... James is at the top of the list.

So for me (as well as a bunch of other James fans), I'm so not excited about this. I'm boycotting all of it. Even if we find out it was James' choice not to be involved... I still won't do it.

Wow, really? What if he simply wasn't able to attend, or just didn't want to get involved at this point? Should Joss have put it off until he could do it? I'm sure he squeezed this into some kind of break in Avengers filming. And a lot of people thought ASH should be involved as well- but I don't see anyone saying they're going to "boycott" it. I just think there are far worse things to boycott.
 
P
patriot1123
[No message]
T
The Scourge
[No message]
M
Mithol
[No message]
I was just about to come post about this!

http://muchadothemovie.com/

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/new...nothing-252323

Joss Whedon Teases Mysterious New Project 'Much Ado About Nothing'

10/23/2011 by Kimberly Nordyke

"Buffy the Vampire Slayer," "Firefly" and "Dollhouse" fans rejoiced after Nathan Fillion tweeted a link to a site saying principal photography has wrapped on the previously unannounced project, which set the Internet abuzz with speculation.

Joss Whedon has wrapped his next project. Only thing is, no one seems to know much about it.

Fans of Whedon's Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Firefly and Dollhouse were rejoicing late Sunday night after frequent Whedon collaborators Nathan Fillion, Sean Maher and costume designer Shawna Trpcic tweeted a link to MuchAdoTheMovie.com.

The site features a single photo of a man in what appears to be a lake wearing scuba gear and holding a martini glass.

The site reads, "Bellwether Pictures is proud to announce the completion of principal photography" and says the project is "a film by Joss Whedon based on a play."

It also lists a slew of actors who have worked with Whedon in the past, including Fillion, Amy Acker, Fran Krantz, Tom Lenk and Sean Maher.

The site doesn't offer any further details, but the news did spur speculation around the Internet about what the project might be and how Whedon found time to finish it while also working on the upcoming Avengers movie.

Some speculated that it might be his follow-up to the web series Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog. The obvious question, of course, is whether it is in fact some sort of adaptation of the William Shakespeare play.

Meanwhile, Trpcic answered some questions about the project on Sunday night but gave only vague answers.

In response to the question "full-length film, short or web series?" she wrote: "Film ish not sure in what format he will release it."

http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/10/2...about-nothing/

Joss Whedon announces secret film of 'Much Ado About Nothing,' ability to warp time and space at will

by Adam B. Vary



Just kidding about the second thing. And yet it seems that as far as Joss Whedon is concerned, writing and directing the massive comic book tentpole blockbuster The Avengers; writing and overseeing the Buffy Season 9 and Angel & Faith comics for Dark Horse; readying the long-in-limbo The Cabin in the Woods (which he co-wrote and produced) for an April 13, 2012 release by Lionsgate; and developing a post-apocalyptic web series with Warren Ellis is just not busy enough. Earlier today, actor Nathan Fillion, among others, tweeted out a link to muchadothemovie.com, announcing that Whedon had finished principal photography on a film presumably based on William Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing.

The cast includes a host of Whedonverse alums, including Fillion (Firefly, Buffy, and Dr. Horrible), Amy Acker (Angel and Dollhouse), Alexis Denisof (Buffy, Angel, and Dollhouse), Sean Maher (Firefly), Reed Diamond (Dollhouse), Tom Lenk (Buffy), and Fran Kranz (Dollhouse and The Cabin in the Woods), as well as Clark Gregg, a.k.a. Agent Coulson from Iron Man, Thor, and The Avengers.

Whedon has famously held Shakespeare readings at his home from time to time, but how he managed to squeeze this project into his post-production schedule on The Avengers remains a tantalizing mystery. Much Ado follows two couples "” Benedick and Beatrice, chatty and cynical, and Claudio and Hero, driven almost mute by their love for each other "” who are comically tricked by the dastardly Don John. Given that Acker and Denisof share top billing in Whedon's film, it's fair to surmise that they're playing Benedick and Beatrice. As for the other roles, your guess is as good as mine. Have at it in the comments!

http://www.thewrap.com/movies/column...hinks-so-32093

Joss Whedon Wraps Secret Shakespeare Movie Project (Exclusive)

Published: October 23, 2011

EXCLUSIVE

It's much ado about something.

Joss Whedon has directed, adapted, cast and filmed an entire movie -- an adaptation of Shakespeare's "Much Ado About Nothing" -- in secret, TheWrap has learned.

Whedon, who created "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and "Angel" and wrote and directed Marvel's upcoming "The Avengers," wrote and directed the movie, an individual close to the project told TheWrap Sunday night.

On Sunday night, a website appeared announcing that Whedon's "Much Ado About Nothing," which it says is "based on a play," has completed principal photography. Two people close to the project confirmed that Whedon had indeed filmed a secret movie, and only announced it on Sunday night.

The independent film doesn't yet have distribution.

Actors include Sean Maher, who starred on Whedon's "Firefly" and in his 2005 movie "Serenity;" Fran Kranz, who stars in "The Cabin in the Woods," which Whedon wrote and is producing; "Castle," "Firefly" and "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" star Nathan Fillion and "Angel" and "Cabin" star Amy Acker. Spencer Treat Clark and Jillian Morgese, newcomers to Whedon's projects, also star.

Some of the actors took to Twitter to express excitement about the film Sunday night.

"I promise you it's the real deal and we're VERY excited about it!" Maher wrote.

He also tweeted, "Surprise! We just wrapped today..."

Shakespeare's "Much Ado About Nothing" is the kind of project Whedon likes. Its use of malapropisms appeals to Whedon's style, as do its characters who have unconventional views about love.

The play is a comedy about two sets of lovers. The fast-talking Benedick and Beatrice banter cynically while the sweet young Claudio and Hero are so in love they can barely speak.

Benedick and Beatrice get tricked into proclaiming their love for eachother while Claudio is fooled into rejecting Hero at the altar. But the scheme is foiled and the two couples wed.

http://www.badassdigest.com/2011/10/...ut-joss-whedon

Much Ado About Joss Whedon

By Devin Faraci | October 24, 2011

A mysterious website announces a new Joss Whedon film"¦ that is already complete.



Mystery! Drama! Intrigue!

These are all things you'll find in Shakespeare plays. You may also find them on the internet tonight as the nerd community is abuzz with a mysterious announcement from Joss Whedon and company. A tweet from Nathan Fillion directed people to a website that simply announced completion of a movie called Much Ado About Nothing, directed by Joss Whedon. The cast list is a who's who of Whedon regulars: Amy Acker, Alexis Denisof, Fillion, Tom Lenk, Clark Gregg and more.

The only other info on the page is that it's "˜Based On A Play,' which I assume means the Shakespeare.

My guess? Whedon and his friends were hanging around and decided to shoot a version of Much Ado About Nothing, probably set in the modern day. It might even be a loose adaptation. And possibly even a short. I doubt it's some kind of slick film, especially since Whedon just finished shooting The Avengers; Much Ado About Nothing is likely the kind of thing these folks threw together over a couple of weekends.

With modern technology being what it is, and with a group of friends like that, interesting things can happen. I'm curious to find out more.

MUCH ADO ABOUT JOSS WHEDON'S (SECRET?) MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING

Joss Whedon did Shakespeare and didn't tell anyone!

By Renn Brown · 10.24.2011

A tweet and a website image"¦ that's about all there is to go on with this one:

Last night Nathan Fillion tweeted a link to www.muchadothemovie.com where one simply finds a single image announcing the completion of filming on Much Ado About Nothing, a film "based on a play" and directed by Joss Whedon.

The image lists a cast that includes Nathan Fillion obviously, as well as other frequent Whedon collaborators like Amy Acker of Angel and Dollhouse. Aside from the quirky little image of a submerged man holding a martini, there's little else here.



So obviously now the buzz is raging over how Whedon shot this film in secret with no one the wiser. It's entirely possible, especially if the director decided to do something quiet and small. The Shakespearean comedy is a simple story of two couples in love who are tricked throughout the play until the villain is caught and everyone dances, the classic stuff. It's filled with the kind of rapid-fire comedy dialogue that many screenwriters love to riff on today and, like virtually all of the Bard's plays, is easily adapted to any time period.

I'm sure we'll find out something more substantive soon, but since tweeting the link the only follow up comment Fillion has made is that the project is "very real," and a joke playing up the mystery. There is the obvious aside that this "film" could end up being more a web-series or VOD-only film experiment, but even the actors aren't sure.

We'll fill you in as soon as someone fills us in!


Offical Press Release

http://muchadothemovie.com/documents...essRelease.pdf

Santa Monica, CA (October 24th, 2011)

Bellwether Pictures proudly announces the completion of principal photography on MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING, a modern version of Shakespeare's classic comedy adapted and directed by Joss Whedon (Marvel's upcoming THE AVENGERS, "Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog"). Filmed in just 12 days entirely on location in exotic Santa Monica, the film features a stellar cast of beloved (or soon to be beloved) actors "“ some of them veterans of Shakespearean theater, some completely new to the form. But all dedicated to the idea that this story bears retelling, that this dialogue is as fresh and intoxicating as any being written, and that the joy of working on a passion project surrounded by dear friends, admired colleagues and an atmosphere of unabashed rapture far outweighs their hilariously miniature paychecks.

MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING is the first feature from Bellwether, a micro-studio created by Joss Whedon and Kai Cole for the production of small, independent narratives for all media, embracing a DYI ethos and newer technologies for, in this particular case, a somewhat older story.

Shot in glorious black and white by Jay Hunter (PAPER HEART, "Dollhouse"), the film stars Amy Acker (CABIN IN THE WOODS, "Alias") and Alexis Denisof ("How I Met Your Mother", "Angel") as Beatrice and Benedick, the world's least likely lovers headed for their inevitable tumble into love. As Joss Whedon puts it: "The text is to me a deconstruction of the idea of love, which is ironic, since the entire production is a love letter "“ to the text, to the cast, even to the house it's shot in." The supporting cast includes Nathan Fillion ("Castle", WAITRESS) as Dogberry, Clark Gregg (AVENGERS, IRON MAN) as Leonato, Fran Kranz (CABIN IN THE WOODS, "Dollhouse") as Claudio and Reed Diamond ("Franklin & Bash", MONEYBALL) as Don Pedro.

The film was produced by Whedon, line-produced by Nathan Kelly and M. Elizabeth Hughes, and co-produced by Kai Cole and Danny Kaminsky. The super-impressive cast is listed below. Full tech credits (for the extraordinary crew) will be up shortly. The film should be completed by early spring and headed for the festival circuit, because it is fancy.

The Players:

Amy Acker - Beatrice
Alexis Denisof - Benedick
Nathan Fillion - Dogberry
Clark Gregg - Leonato
Reed Diamond - Don Pedro
Fran Kranz - Claudio
Sean Maher - Don John
Spencer Treat Clark - Borachio
Riki Lindhome - Conrade
Ashley Johnson - Margaret
Emma Bates - Ursula
Tom Lenk - Verges
Nick Kocher - First Watchman
Brian McElhaney - Second Watchman
Joshua Zar - Leonato's aide
Paul M. Meston - Friar Francis
Romy Rosemont - The Sexton
And introducing Jillian Morgese as Hero


It sounds like Joss shot this like Dr. Horrible.
 
Looks fun, will check it out whatever it is...

/SK
 
Wow, really? What if he simply wasn't able to attend, or just didn't want to get involved at this point? Should Joss have put it off until he could do it? I'm sure he squeezed this into some kind of break in Avengers filming. And a lot of people thought ASH should be involved as well- but I don't see anyone saying they're going to "boycott" it. I just think there are far worse things to boycott.

There are far worse things to boycott... and I'm probably going to go back on this to be honest... but if he wasn't able to attend or didn't want to do it, I'll still be annoyed. Honestly, I, personally feel like Joss should have really fought to have James involved. And if it comes out that it was James' choice not to be involved, I'll be pissed at him too! And I'll probably write into his website telling him how angry I am.
 
There are far worse things to boycott... and I'm probably going to go back on this to be honest... but if he wasn't able to attend or didn't want to do it, I'll still be annoyed. Honestly, I, personally feel like Joss should have really fought to have James involved. And if it comes out that it was James' choice not to be involved, I'll be pissed at him too! And I'll probably write into his website telling him how angry I am.

Ooookay, well, that's your opinion & perogative certainly. I will never understand getting all upset about it, but that's just me.
 
BuffyElevated
BuffyElevated
[No message]
There are far worse things to boycott... and I'm probably going to go back on this to be honest... but if he wasn't able to attend or didn't want to do it, I'll still be annoyed. Honestly, I, personally feel like Joss should have really fought to have James involved. And if it comes out that it was James' choice not to be involved, I'll be pissed at him too! And I'll probably write into his website telling him how angry I am.

Just because Joss is doing a project doesn't mean she should automatically hire James for the part. James is a damn good actor, but sometimes there are just better people for a role. And besides, most people would get bored seeing the same few people in everything all the time. I love Nick Brendon, and love his work outside BtVS, but do I think that just because he was in BtVS that Joss should hire him for the projects he does? No.
There are lots of actors out there trying to get a shot; that's why there are things called auditions, so casting agents and directors can find unused or raw talent. I understand that you worship at the Church of Marsters, but boycotting a project just because he isn't in it seems a little silly.
 
T
The Scourge
[No message]
Z
zobothehobo
I found this post quite offensive. I never suggested everything Joss does, James should be involved in. And I don't worship James.
Nice to see Alexis and Amy be the leads. It will be great seeing them together. Plus, Reed, Nathan, Sean, Fran, Tom, and Clark Gregg! I may not be Whedon's #1 Fan, but I love how he re-uses his cast.

I am not boycotting, because my room is not covered solely with pictures of James Marsters.
 
Bottom line as far as people who have worked with Joss being Shakespearean actors/qualified to do something like this... James is at the top of the list.

Do you know enough about Anthony's career to say definitively that James is a better Shakespearean actor than Anthony is? I don't know enough about James to say that Anthony is better. Anthony did do a really beautiful monologue recently for "In Love With Shakespeare:"

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqjgBjBt9sw"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqjgBjBt9sw[/ame]

It would have been nice to see both of them in Joss's new production, and I'll be interested to find out (if we ever do) whether their absence was their choice or Joss's. But I'll still watch it.
 
Just because Joss is doing a project doesn't mean she should automatically hire James for the part. James is a damn good actor, but sometimes there are just better people for a role. And besides, most people would get bored seeing the same few people in everything all the time. I love Nick Brendon, and love his work outside BtVS, but do I think that just because he was in BtVS that Joss should hire him for the projects he does? No.
There are lots of actors out there trying to get a shot; that's why there are things called auditions, so casting agents and directors can find unused or raw talent. I understand that you worship at the Church of Marsters, but boycotting a project just because he isn't in it seems a little silly.

I didn't say just because Joss is doing a project, he should hire James. I said because it's a Shakespeare adaptation and Shakespeare is James' thing, James should be involved. My god.

And I take great offense to this "Church of Marsters" thing. I don't think he's god. He's not a perfect man, far from it. I've never said that and never suggested it.

---------- Post added at 04:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:48 PM ----------

I can see I've upset quite a deal of people with my comments and I'd like to rephrase.

I do not know that James is a better Shakespearean actor than ASH. And I was when I first saw the cast list and still am puzzled at why he's [ASH] not on it. But my allegiance lies with James. I'm not the only one in the world who feels this way... and I understand I'm the only one on this board who does and that's fine... I'm not expecting anyone else to feel the way I do. I'm simply expressing my opinion. I don't like that James isn't involved in this.... Not because I want him to be in anything Joss does... but because this is made up of almost solely people Joss has worked with before and James isn't on the list.

If you hate me or have a problem with me for not being excited for this that's fine... but I think that's ridiculous. And as I have said before, I will probably go back on my "I won't watch it" thing because it does sound awesome... but right now I'm upset. And that's my right to be.
 
I can see I've upset quite a deal of people with my comments and I'd like to rephrase.

I do not know that James is a better Shakespearean actor than ASH. And I was when I first saw the cast list and still am puzzled at why he's [ASH] not on it. But my allegiance lies with James. I'm not the only one in the world who feels this way... and I understand I'm the only one on this board who does and that's fine... I'm not expecting anyone else to feel the way I do. I'm simply expressing my opinion. I don't like that James isn't involved in this.... Not because I want him to be in anything Joss does... but because this is made up of almost solely people Joss has worked with before and James isn't on the list.

If you hate me or have a problem with me for not being excited for this that's fine... but I think that's ridiculous.

I'm not at all upset with you or what you wrote.

My first reaction was, "Whoa, Anthony is way better at Shakespeare than James!" And then I said to myself, well, I'm hardly in any position to say that, since I don't know anything about James's Shakespeare experience or ability. 🙂

Then I realized that you and I are in pretty much exactly the same position, for pretty much exactly the same reason, just being driven by different targets.

Which is to say I totally understand why you're upset, because I was too. So much that it kinda hurts. *sigh* I think we each almost feel, or are afraid, that our guy is being disrespected. I am really anxious to find out whose choice it was that they're not involved.
 
Z
zobothehobo
Exactly! Oh I'm so glad we feel the same way.... I am also really anxious to find out why they weren't involved
Much Ado is my favourite Shakespeare play of all time so I'm over the moon about this. It'll have a lot to live up to though, both the BBC adaptation and the production at The Globe were fantastic. I'm really looking forward to seeing more of Alexis and I'm interested that of all people Sean is going to play Don John, he's usually the good guy.
 
I might be a sore "loser" fan... But I don't know why or how and I don't care... All I know is James Marsters isn't a part of this and I'm pissed. If there's one thing anyone who claims to be a fan of James should know, it's that he's OBSESSED with Shakespeare.

Maybe that's why he is not in the movie. For all we know Joss took a lot of liberties with the story. An actor obsessed with Shakespeare might not like that.

I for one am left to wonder once again what exactly Joss sees in Tom Lenk. That man can't act his way out of a paper bag. Not that I have any interest in this movie, to be honest, despite my vast appreciation of Alexis Denisof.
 
BuffyElevated
BuffyElevated
[No message]
D
dexeded
I never really liked Tom Lenk.
The great thing about Shakespeare's plays is that you can set them in ANY time period and they still work.

Could be awesome. I love me some 'bard'.
 
BuffyElevated
BuffyElevated
I always love that siggy!!! so awesome!
VisionGirl
VisionGirl
ITA on both counts!
I didn't say just because Joss is doing a project, he should hire James. I said because it's a Shakespeare adaptation and Shakespeare is James' thing, James should be involved. My god.

And I take great offense to this "Church of Marsters" thing. I don't think he's god. He's not a perfect man, far from it. I've never said that and never suggested it.

---------- Post added at 04:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:48 PM ----------

I can see I've upset quite a deal of people with my comments and I'd like to rephrase.

I do not know that James is a better Shakespearean actor than ASH. And I was when I first saw the cast list and still am puzzled at why he's [ASH] not on it. But my allegiance lies with James. I'm not the only one in the world who feels this way... and I understand I'm the only one on this board who does and that's fine... I'm not expecting anyone else to feel the way I do. I'm simply expressing my opinion. I don't like that James isn't involved in this.... Not because I want him to be in anything Joss does... but because this is made up of almost solely people Joss has worked with before and James isn't on the list.

If you hate me or have a problem with me for not being excited for this that's fine... but I think that's ridiculous. And as I have said before, I will probably go back on my "I won't watch it" thing because it does sound awesome... but right now I'm upset. And that's my right to be.


Ok, well the ones of us who think you're being rediculous about boycotting simply because James isn't in it have a right to feel that way too, 'cause that's our opinion. And the vicious cycle continues. Sorry, but that's the nature of discussion forums; people are allowed to have different viewpoints.
I don't care if you're excited for the project or not. Honestly, I probably won't see it just because I'm not big on Shakespere stuff. I just think boycotting something just because a particular actor or actress isn't in it is like a 3-year-old child throwing a tantrum because they didn't get their way about something. That applies to everyone, not just you.
 
I loved the Kenneth Branagh/Emma Thompson movie version of this. Michael Keaton's Dogberry was the hardest I've ever laughed at Shakespeare. (And Ben Elton as Verges!)
 
Sean-Maher-Much-Ado_510.jpg


Much-Ado-Alexis-Acker_510.jpg


EW Interview with Joss Whedon, Sean Maher, and Amy Acker located here

After wrapping production on Marvel Studios' gargantuan summer tent-pole The Avengers, writer-producer Joss Whedon was supposed to go on a month-long vacation with his wife, Kai Cole. Instead, Whedon tells EW exclusively that his wife suggested he finally make the feature film version of William Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing he'd been ruminating over for years.

And so he did "” adapting the script, casting the film with Whedonverse alums like Nathan Fillion, Amy Acker (Angel), Alexis Denisof (Buffy, Angel), and Sean Maher (Firefly), and shooting the self-funded, black-and-white indie in secret over 12 days at his Santa Monica, Calif., home. (Production wrapped on Sunday, and Whedon says it will be ready for spring 2012 film festivals.) How did Whedon pull all this off? What was it about this particular Shakespeare comedy that drew him in? And what did stars Sean Maher "” who plays the fiendish villain Don John "” and Amy Acker "” who co-stars with Denisof as the sarcastic, talky couple at the center of the play "” make of all of this ado about Much Ado? Check out EW's exclusive Q&As with Whedon, Maher, and Acker below, as well as exclusive shots of Maher, Denisof and Acker from the film:

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: This announcement took people by surprise to say the least. How did this all come together?

JOSS WHEDON: Well, it's not a bit secret that I've done these [Shakespeare] readings before, and I always had a vague notion of shooting Much Ado. But I didn't really have a take on it. And then, for some reason, I kinda sorta did. As we were finishing The Avengers in New York, my wife and I were planning our vacation for our 20th anniversary. And she said, "Let's not take the vacation. Make a movie instead." I was like, "I'm not even sure if I can adapt the script, cast the movie, and prep it in a month." And she was like, "Well, that's your vacation time, so you do it." And so I did.


So how did you get the ability to bend time and space to your will to be able to pull this off? It's not like you don't have a bunch of other things going on.

[Chuckles] You know, I am busy. But you know, if you want something done, ask the busy man; nobody else has time. There is an element of "I have a serious problem" "” that's one thing. And then there's an element of this is the best vacation I've ever taken. I mean, yes, it was super hard, it was a ton of work, and there were moments where I went, "What's wrong with me? What am I thinking about? I need to rest!" But I've never been so well rested and so well fed as I have on this movie. You know, you make the time, because no one's going to make it for you. There's never going to be a good time to do it. You make the time and you make it work if you really, really want it. And I really did.

You shot this at your home, I understand?

Yes. One of the advantages of Much Ado is it all takes place on Leonato's estate. It's all one location. I don't have an estate. I have a nice house.

Like Dr. Horrible, did you bankroll this yourself?

I did. My wife and I started a micro studio, Bellwether Pictures, in order to do things like this, creator-controlled small fare.

What is it about Shakespeare that you love so much, especially this play? My understanding is one of the strange things about Much Ado is it's one of the few plays that predominantly in prose, and not poetry.

I didn't even notice that until Alexis pointed it out. But that actually proved useful for is. It wasn't why I chose it, but I do think it's one of the reasons why I love it. It's very modern. The language, the jokes, and the attitudes translate really, really easily. [The actors] do say the words as they're written [in the play], but they connect to a modern audience in a way that portions of the other comedies don't necessarily.

Was this one of the plays you'd done readings of at your home?

Yeah, we'd done a reading of it starring Amy and Alexis years ago, and that's when I knew that if I could ever do it, I would do it with them.

You said earlier that you hadn't had a take on it until you were in the middle of shooting Avengers. What is your take on this? What did you end up wanting to do with this film?

I had trouble at first, because it had the words "About Nothing" in the title. So I was like, "I don't have anything to say about nothing." But really when I started pouring over it, I got a very strong sense of how a little bit dark and twisted it is. The movie's in black-and-white partially because it's kind of a noir comedy. I realized that everybody in it behaves like such a dolt "” an articulate dolt, but a dolt. I fixated on this notion that our ideas of romantic love are created for us by the society around us, and then escape from that is grown-up love, is marriage, is mature love, to escape the ideals of love that we're supposed to follow. So that clicked for me when I realized, oh, I get why it matters everybody goes through the weird machinations we go through.

Have there been any nibbles of interest in distribution today?

I haven't heard anything yet. I've just been enjoying the Internet response. We're feeling our way on this one, just like Dr. Horrible. I do mean it to be in theaters. But we haven't gotten any real plan except [going to] film festivals because it sounded like it would be festive.

Finally, how did you keep this a secret? A lot of your cast are Twitter addicts, especially Nathan, and you're not Mr. Low Profile right now.

Well, I asked the cast specifically and everybody involved not to say anything until we wrapped. And, you know, it all happened very, very fast. That's how you know. When it's something that fast, you actually have a shot. When something's rolling around for three years, it's harder. This film was a month from inception to production, and then 12 days to shoot. Even Nathan did not tweet for that long.




ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: How'd you guys keep this film a secret?

SEAN MAHER: I think everyone was on board, just waiting for him to give us the go, so we could talk about it. After your article came out [about me coming out of the closet], I was doing tons of press, so I had asked him specifically if I could talk about the movie, and he said, Not yet. I would never in a million years betray his trust like that, and I think that everybody felt the same. It was such a magical experience because everybody that was there just wanted to be there, you know, with every part of their soul and heart. It was really a wonderful experience, and I don't think anybody would have leaked it anywhere.

It's totally fun that you guys keep this stuff secret.

Nathan and I hadn't seen each other in forever, so we're taking pictures left and right on our phones. And Tom Lenk and I haven't worked together in awhile either. Last time I was at Joss' house, [Buffy scribe] Jane Espenson had taken a Golden Girls episode and made it The Golden Boys. Tom did that, and I came and did that for Jane. That was the last time I was at Joss' house, so Tom and I and Nathan and I are all taking our pictures on our phones. Joss was like, "Don't you dare tweet that! Not yet!"

Tell me, how did this come together? How did Joss pitch this to you? How did he convince you to do it?

I was in Chicago at the time. It was like 2 or 2:30 in the morning, and I was arriving back to my hotel from work. I had an email from Joss, telling me that he was putting together a cast for Much Ado About Nothing, and he wanted me to come play Don John. He said, "I need a sexy villain, what sayeth you?" I initially was terrified because I've never done Shakespeare, and Shakespeare with Joss "” I always want to do right by him because I love him so much. So I told him, I'm absolutely on board, let me just make sure I can clear the dates. I spoke to my manager, he called Playboy Club. Ironically, we got some time off from Playboy Club, and the day I started rehearsal on Much Ado About Nothing, the show got canceled. It was a little bittersweet, but look, anything that Joss would ask me to come do, I'm pretty confident I would do. It was a no-brainer on my part. It still was scary for me. It was one of the most challenging things I've ever done, but yet, it didn't feel like work.

What about it was so challenging?

That it was Shakespeare! Shakespeare, to do it right, is not easy at all. I think in this instance, because we were shooting it in such a short period of time, we all had to come to work completely prepared, know all of our words, know the ins and outs of the play. There wasn't a lot of time for multiple takes. There wasn't a lot of time for many set-ups, in terms of camera angles. He was sort of getting in there and filming a live performance, which was exhilarating and scary at the same time. I mean, it was incredibly challenging, yet it didn't feel like work, as well.

Well, and you were with the Whedon alums "” what a great group to work with, right?

Some of them I hadn't met at all. And obviously, others I was overjoyed to be able to spend some time with again, like Amy Acker and Nathan "” our lives get so busy that we hardly get to see each other. It's just such a gift to get to come together and work on something we love for him. Then, of course, there's the handful of actors I knew had worked with Joss, but I had never worked with before.

Is playing a villain a new thing for you?

Completely new. And I said that to Joss! Last night, we were wrapping up my last scene. I was just having so much fun playing this role. He's just deliciously mean, trying to thwart his brother's happiness and foil the wedding in the play. We had finished a take, and I walked off and I was sort of sitting there smirking with Joss, and he's like, "You're such a dick." It's so much fun to be a dick because I've never been a dick! He's like, "Are you kidding me? You do dick well." I was like, "No, it's the first time." He's smart, he's not just mean. He's setting up all of these misunderstandings and planting all of these seeds of deception, and he's just so mischievous, but in such a calculated, intelligent way. That was really, really fun to play.

How is this updated? What's the vibe like of the movie?

It does feel contemporary. The direction we were getting from Joss was to make it was real, especially with the language, not to be big and Shakespearian, but to bring it in and be intimate and bring it as close to a realistic way of speaking as we could. And Joss' house is just magnificent. Not ostentatious by any means, but just a maze of halls and so many different bedrooms and this pool that overlooks the Santa Monica mountains. It's gorgeous, just the most perfect setting. Everybody who was there, so desperately wanted to be there and you felt that. It really felt like we were doing something great. So I'm excited.




ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Joss told me he had done a reading of the play with you and Alexis. Do you remember when that was?

AMY ACKER: I feel like it was maybe three years ago? Somewhere around that time.

And he's been doing these for a while?

Yeah, since even before I met him. When I came on to Angel, which was a long time ago, he had already been doing them for awhile. For several years we would do, like, them every month, and then we'll go three years and not do one. Then he would bring everybody back and kind of get on a roll with it again. There's usually a group of people whose always there, and then he picks up new people each time.

When did you get the call that he'd be doing Much Ado About Nothing as a film?

I think it was about three weeks before we started. Maybe two-and-a-half. I know when Clark Gregg decided that he was going to do it, there had been some other people who were maybe going to play that part, and then they had conflicts that came up, so he kind of came in and saved the day at the end. He was like, "Well I only had four days to learn all of the lines," and I was like, "Yeah, we all found out last week, so don't feel too bad." [Laughs]

Do you know who was going to be playing Leonato before Clark?

Anthony Head.

What went through your head when you got the call. That was the end of September?

Yeah, right towards the end of September. I mean, first of all I was like, "Sure, that sounds awesome!" Alexis and I met with Joss maybe one or two times right after we decided that we were doing it, and then we rehearsed kind of the week before. But when we showed up the first day, I was like, "Oh, this is a real movie!" We didn't quite know what it was going to be, and seeing all of the trucks and the lights and everything, everyone was kind of like, "Oh, we really are doing a movie!"

How did Joss explain keeping this a secret?

Well, he basically just said, "We're not going to tell anyone until we finish." Luckily since everyone was scrambling to learn their lines and figure out what the heck they were doing, no one really had time. I think it was mostly making sure Nathan didn't tweet about it. That's how all news in the world seems to spread. [Laughs]

What were those 12 days like? Anything really stick out?

Oh geez, the whole thing was really awesome. I mean, it was all my favorite people, so we were all just hanging out in their amazing house, and we just kind of had to keep reminding ourselves that, "Oh wait, we're actually working!" It just kind of felt like a big 12-day party.

What was the look of the film? How did it all look?

The costume designer went shopping in all of our closets, and she just sort of chose. We are all wearing our own clothes, and then she kind of added little pieces here and there.

Did you conclude filming yesterday? The website is already up"¦

Yeah. I think they had [the site] ready on Saturday, when we were shooting. From what it looks like, I wasn't actually filming at the end of the day yesterday, so I wasn't there, but it seems like they must have posted it the second they wrapped the film.

Why do you think Joss did this film, and did it so quickly?

I thought it was just because he was super cool. I think his wife and him were going to Italy for a vacation, and then she was kind of like, "Why don't you just shoot that movie you've been wanting to do instead?" So, that's sort of why it happened now. She's kind of just really amazing. She built the house that it shot in. You know, she just kind of makes stuff happen. If Kai says something, then she like, actually does it every time.

Wait, Kai designed the house?

Yeah, she's an architect. She built it and designed it and decorated it and everything. Pretty much you could just film the house without all of us talking in it, and it would be a really great movie.

What kind of style?

I'm not sure if it's from France or Italy, but everything is old and warm and it's just the most welcoming place ever.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for that - love the photo of Alexis and Amy. I'm looking forward to seeing them together again, but wonder how difficult it will be to keep Wesley and Fred out of my head. 🙂

So it sounds like Joss did want Anthony, but a "conflict" came up. Dammit.
 
Thanks for that - love the photo of Alexis and Amy. I'm looking forward to seeing them together again, but wonder how difficult it will be to keep Wesley and Fred out of my head. 🙂

Yeah, seeing the two of them together is the biggest reason I am excited about this. The two of them playing love interests again will be great.
 
BuffyElevated
BuffyElevated
[No message]
The great thing about Shakespeare's plays is that you can set them in ANY time period and they still work.

Could be awesome. I love me some 'bard'.

Exactly! My (English professor)cousin who's also a Whedon fan commented on my FB post that he doubts these actors can do as well with this play as Whedon thinks they can. I honestly think it was a snobbish thing to say. And some people can be that way about Shakespeare. But really his plays were written to be performed not read (& surely not envisioned to be studied to death as we do lol) so I am ok with any kind of Shakespeare production: professional, high school, children's adaptation, graphic novel, whatever!

Those photos & that interview have me stoked!

And if I should feel "offended" about any cast member, it'd be Charisma Carpenter, with whom Whedon said he would work again. Yet he still has 't cast her in anything! I'm not saying that she'd be suited for Shakespeare, although who knows? 😉. Still, I can't imagine boycotting it solely for that reason.

(I am pretty sure he said that merely in the way of apology again, who knows if they'll ever really work together again)
 
Back
Top Bottom