Spike or Angel?

Lol yeah Dru is such a whore 😛 But Angel is a better hero not because he moped longer because he cares about people. Spike cares about himself and Buffy he will only save people to get into Buffys knickers.
 
Black Eye Guy
Black Eye Guy
Exactly, and he showed that care for people by feeling sorry for the people he had killed!
F
FahrbotDrusilla
I think I disagree with every word in this post. Have you watched season 5 of Angel?
I like them both for different reasons.

It's really difficult for me to choose one over the other but I'll admit that I've always been a huge Angel fan more so than Spike so if I HAVE to choose I'll go with Angel.

If for no other reason than that he's tall, dark and handsome...has broad shoulders, an amazing smile...etc, etc, etc.
 
He did it as a way to feel love, because he could not feel it properly as a vampire and he was confused, he thought if he had a soul he could understand love, and that in turn would make Buffy love him, He did it for purely self motivated reasons, EARNED his soul, pfft, he was a selfish demon who did not understand love.
Umm...Spike loved as a souless vampire. He loved Drusilla, and Buffy. He understood love way more than a lot of other characters. That's not why he got a soul.

Yes, what the point of this reply, It is oblivious Angel was a better good guy, as I have said above!, Still looking for that sarcasm Stick...
It's obvious, not oblivious. Two very different words. 😉

Moving on...I loved Spike, and I loved Angel. I loved Spike more, just because I can. If they got together, I'd be the happiest girl in the world. 😉
 
F
FahrbotDrusilla
[No message]
Black Eye Guy
Black Eye Guy
oblivious: oh lol :) Well that shows the level of my spelling ability, Thank god I am exempt from spelling in my English exams, lol!
Umm...Spike loved as a soulless vampire. He loved Drusilla, and Buffy. He understood love way more than a lot of other characters. That's not why he got a soul.

Well That depends on whether you believe people can love when they don't have a soul, Spike was a demon in season 6, he had a muzzle but he was still a soulless demon, Look at the dialog between him and Clem before he leaves in Seeing Red, he is conflicted, trying to understand what he was feeling. He believed while he was attempting to rape Buffy, that it was a love act, He does not understand love, until he gets a soul!

It's obvious, not oblivious. Two very different words. 😉
Lol, well Slow am I! I am dyslexic so that's my excuse, lol
 
I love Spike. Less broody, more fun. Why is it the main character in each show is so annoying. both moaning and whiny. Sorry, just dont like Angel or Buffy. Spike loves his life(or unlife) and lives it how he wants. even when hes obsessed with buffy, he still doesnt mope around all the time like angel.
 
I'm sorry is there a more evil plan??

Frankly, yes. Destroying the world puts humanity out of their misery.


Yes, It shows he actually cared about the amount of people he had killed.

Actually, no. It shows that he couldn't handle seeing all the misery and pain that he caused, in his own head. If he cared then he would've tried to help other people. But, nope, it was all.about.him. His misery, his guilt, no thought of using his power to help people who needed it.


I said his plan sucked, that does not take away from all the people he killed, and out of all those peoples pain and suffering it took him months to recover, oh wow he obliviously has a really good soul..
Wow, your points suck. Your argument actually favours Spike, though you do not realise it. Spike's a pragmatist. He realises there is nothing he can do about the people he killed. What he can do is help the people who need him now. What did Angel do? Jack and shit. Hell, Angel gets an opportunity to help somebody( the flashback in the snackbar, with Faith and Angelus), and he LETS him die, so he can have a little snack, while pretending he couldn't have helped him. 100 years Angel did nothing! And that wouldn't have changed if he didn't meet Buffy. Angel is no better than Spike, your points only make them equal, but the show proves Spike is a better man.
He did it as a way to feel love, because he could not feel it properly as a vampire and he was confused, he thought if he had a soul he could understand love, and that in turn would make Buffy love him, He did it for purely self motivated reasons, EARNED his soul, pfft, he was a selfish demon who did not understand love.

No, wrong. Spike understood love. He had no moral compass, a soul is about knowing right from wrong. 100 years as a vampire corrupted his view of everything love is. Let us not forget he turned his mother to save her from death. Twisted as it is, its an act of love. Having a soul is immaterial.



Oh wow, well I am so glad that all it took was buffy telling him so, to make him stop caring about all the people he had killed! and he did, with Angel we constantly see that guilt hanging over him, that's not there with spike, the only thing on Spikes mind was Buffy!
Uhm. O...k. Angel only decided to help people because of his love for Buffy. I think you're too blinded by your dislike of Spike to see the facts. Do I need to remind you of lawyers in a wine cellar?? Angel, what a hero.
Yes, what the point of this reply, It is oblivious Angel was a better good guy, as I have said above!, Still looking for that sarcasm Stick...

I broke my sarcasm stick beyond repair, beating someone over the head with it.
 
F
FahrbotDrusilla
You SO rock! haha!
Lol yeah Dru is such a whore 😛 But Angel is a better hero not because he moped longer because he cares about people. Spike cares about himself and Buffy he will only save people to get into Buffys knickers.


I disagree about Drusilla but I agree about Spike and Angel.
 
Spike and dru wrent married. and so what if she slept with Angelus. It takes a lot more than that to make her a whore.
 
Actually, i DONT disagree with a lot of people, only when,in my opinion people are wrong.
And if you were hurt by that lame insult, then i swear you must have had an EASY life, as to be honest, it wasn't even an insult, more obvious observation, as most all my posts are tinged with Sarcasm, and if you can't see that, then you either haven't read all my posts, which negates the first comment telling me that you know i disagree with lot of people, OR you havent understood my comments, so should infact go back and read them all with the sarcastic meter running....is this where i add a wink smilie to take a harsh edge off my words...ohh ok😉
 
Actually you do disagree with a lot of people when you think youre right. even when proved wrong. I cant say Ive noticed you being particularly sarcastic in them.

And I was not hurt, just dont think I deserved to be insulted. And suggesting that Im too stupid to notice the sarcasm (which is what it seemed like) is, to me, and insult.
 
Now now people! I suggest ignoring them, if they want to be rude let them then the mods can deal with it, No offense botd i'm just saying.Not even saying who's rude and who wasn't.Not going there.
EWwwwww to Angelus Spike Darla DRu all having sex with eachother!!!

I thought this topic was who preferd who Spike or Angel?????
He he he....

On Topic.....-
|
|
V
I Prefer Angel cos He helps people no matter what and Spike although i think he is great character he is in your face alot,and has no tact. You notice the lack of tact more with Spike then you do with Angel.
 
You show me one thread when i have been proven wrong that i have continued.....show me that.
Cause its never.
When its ONLY supposition in an argument then i have continued, BUT when its proof, then i concede. Just because something seems logical in your head, does not make it proof, that just means it works for you, as with any theory with no true out come, there are many differing angles, that does not make me wrong, just means i have a different opinion based on facts at hand.

Like i say if you take that as an insult that could penetrate your heart and make you cry the bitter tears of pain and self doubt, then you need to read myother comments, as seriously, thats a funny, not an insult, you would no when i'm being insulting with a nasty streak.
It was not a commentary on your intellectual status, it was simply a remark that TWO people missed the sarcastic undertones that i add to nearly ALL my posts....and they are there.
The only times i dont is when the discussion is actually a proper debate,a nd at that point i write more then 1 like of comment.....
Jebus H Chris...who'd have thought a simple comment to a simple comment would cause someone to have a right one?

here comes the inserted Smilie😉
 
To add to what botd has said i had an argument when i first met him on c.o.a and i have read his remarks that are insulting and believe you me you know if he is being rude or is being sarcastic and funny! he does put a wink if he is being funny actually as to imply what he means....I would not take it personally it is just his way.
N.B
*To anyone who doen't know Dia Dela Muerte i knew as botd, as he has pionted out.*
Oops Al sorry old habits die hard...*Laughs*
 
E
Edmund Blackadder
Yeah i remember that...ohh happy days....lol. On a quick note...most people here wont know who BoTD is.....lol
W
Wicked
i get that, but if thats the case, wheres the smilie in the post that started this?
Back
Top Bottom