The Totally Random Thread (Part 9)

I wonder if Harry is one of the 30% of Brits who think the Royal Family had something to do with the death of Diana? Maybe supporting the group that he thinks killed his mother is a bit beyond him.
 
Anyanka Bunny Slayer
Anyanka Bunny Slayer
It was MI6 who did it.
Their poor child has the most unfortunate genes. I can understand why they want it to grow up outside of the main limelight.

Could Megan have been unaware of what life was like there? She probably couldn't have imagine what she hadn't experienced. Not defending her, but many are naive like that.

Yes, that's one ugly kid. 😱

Anyway, there's reason that in the past, royals only married other royals (or at the very least, high born individuals). When you're raised royal, you already know what is expected of you. "Never complain, never explain." Just do your duty to the Crown and get on with it.

I'm sure that Meghan had absolutely NO idea what she was in for. Unless you were raised in that environment, there's just no way to understand the scope of it. She probably thought that once she married Harry, she'd be living a luxuriously easy life. Yes, she was an actress, accustomed to flash bulbs and questions. But the British tabloids are an entirely different animal, as she quickly discovered, to her dismay. They're relentless and predatory. You can't charm them. You can't bargain with them. They're out for blood. (Diana was given a pass for awhile, because of her youth, royal connections, and extraordinary charm. But even she fell from grace eventually) Meghan was caught off guard and flustered...despite her acting experience, good looks and cunnung, she soon discovered that one's public image can be damaged beyond all repair in just a matter of hours.

Like Diana and Fergie before her, Meghan occasionally leaks information to the press, via "unnamed sources at the Palace." But this never turns out well, because most of the 'important' people behind the scenes already knows who the 'source' is. Its rather obvious that Meghan has been studying up on Diana's life, trying to emulate her, to some extent. But she is not Diana. No matter how hard she tries to ingratiate herself with the British public, no matter how bright her smile is, no matter how expensive her frocks are, at the end of the day, Meghan is and always be an outsider. Even if the Monarchy has "evolved" over the years, many people will always see her as that divorced, biracial actress who managed to snare a Prince. Times change, yes, but they haven't changed that much. I assure you, the vast majority of those who serve the Crown (the aristocracy, courtiers, etc) are appalled that Harry chose her to be his wife. They're even more put out that the Queen gave her blessing for this union. But since Harry isn't going to be King anyway, no one has jumped off any rooftops...yet.

Honestly, it's so obvious that Meghan calls the shots in this marriage. Instead of trying to fit in a world that is steeped in centuries of tradition, she seems intent on doing things HER way. The Monarchy is an old and grand thing; outdated perhaps, yes...but come on, now. People love it because it IS old and grand. The last thing it needs is a C-list actress blundering in and trying to change it.

It's going to be interesting to see how this plays out. Two royals who don't want to work anymore, and who want to live abroad...what's the point of them then? Yes, Meghan and Harry are wealthy in their own right, and could survive without assistance from the Queen...but their child is still seventh line for the throne, and all three of them would still rescue Royal Protection officers no matter where they go. The British taxpayer should NOT have to foot that bill, because Meghan and Harry AREN'T doing anything.
 
HowiMetdaSlayer
HowiMetdaSlayer
luckily it was Prince Harry & not William
I wonder if Harry is one of the 30% of Brits who think the Royal Family had something to do with the death of Diana? Maybe supporting the group that he thinks killed his mother is a bit beyond him.

@Anyanka Bunny Slayer I have met an MI-6 analyst once who was living in St. Catharines, Ontario when I went to look at a hovercraft (he was a manufacturer). He was very proud of his accomplishments with the Secret Service but of course he couldn't tell me about any of them. If you recall a song from the 1960's called The In Crowd (done by Dobie Gray and an instrumental cover version by the Ramsay Lewis Trio) that started off:

I'm in with the in crowd
I know what the in crowd knows
I'm in with the in crowd
And I go where the in crowd goes

It was a frat boy anthem but maybe this guy knows more than he let on and it describes his attitude completely. The MI-6 would not do anything without some clearance from above, so maybe it does all go back to the royals. I would ask him, but if he told me, he would have to kill me.
 
Oh no, and I told my mom to eat more avocados! Am I fuelling drought and Murder?


Also, I don’t know what you guys are talking about, their kid is so cute! I’d say it hit the genetic lottery - she’s super pretty and he’s handsome! I bet he’s gonna grow up a real stunner.

I guess good for them If they manage to get financially independent, the only thing that bugs me about royals today is their ”no thanks to the duty and demands” but ”yes, to that check”. Though, I imagine they’ll never be fully independent because they’ll need a lot of security wherever they go.

Madame Tussauds were quick to adopt to this it seems, lol, if I read a headline correctly today.
 
I don't follow royal families much, but didn't Sweden recently decide to slim down their monarchy? Prince Charles has rumoured to want to do that, but I think people thought more he would keep Harry and get rid of Andrew, Edward and their children
 
I guess good for them If they manage to get financially independent, the only thing that bugs me about royals today is their ”no thanks to the duty and demands” but ”yes, to that check”. Though, I imagine they’ll never be fully independent because they’ll need a lot of security wherever they go.

If they think the Palace will allow them to be roving Royals without a tether, they're in for a huge surprise. I can only shake my head at this entire situation.

Harry has never been the sharpest tool in the box, and has allowed himself to be manipulated by his wife. Meghan wants all the privilege of being a Royal, but without the work that comes with it. Sorry, it doesn't work that way. Which they'll soon discover, just like Diana did.

Don't mess with the Palace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nix
I don't follow royal families much, but didn't Sweden recently decide to slim down their monarchy? Prince Charles has rumoured to want to do that, but I think people thought more he would keep Harry and get rid of Andrew, Edward and their children

It’s kind of similar to this, two of the current royal children are giving up some duties to have a more normal life (keeping their money though), with the big change being that their kids (5 of them) won’t be royals at all. No titles, no money, no duties.
 
Skanky Vamp
Skanky Vamp
whenever I have no duties I take some exlax and it clears it right up
vFIhHzM.jpg
 
ILLYRIAN
ILLYRIAN
One might think the Queen looks angry, wrong! That is her normal look. And it was the French paparazzi who caused the accident not the Royalty.
On my get and read list for next week...
* Ursula K. Le Guin's Always Coming Home.
*Nazi Moonbase,
an interesting looking game tie-in...
*and an art book about Surrealism, one of my favourite eras of modern art.
🙂 Apart from appliance hire and doctors visit prescription renewal, no outstanding expenses.

Favourite Subway sandwich - footlong ham with lettuce, red onion, capsicum, tomato and blue cheese dressing on Italian herbs and cheese.
Also Vanilla Coke Zero.

Not so favourite things.
New Zealand National Party (our centre-right Opposition political party)
Gustave Flaubert's Madame Bovary (is there a dimension full of unsold copies of that highly overrated French literary 'classic', perhaps adjacent to the one entirely full of shrimp?)
Summers
Hordes of Pokemon Go addicts clustering around our city square
The Summer hiatus for NZ public radio news (best in the country)
Worrying about my 88 year old Dad's health now he's a widower.
 
Do you ever just question why someone gave a child that name, as it feels like an old persons name? My friend named her baby Anna June and it's just not a baby name!
 
Bop
Bop
Better than giving a baby a name that only works for a baby/child
Do you ever just question why someone gave a child that name, as it feels like an old persons name?
All the time. When my sister was pregnant with my eldest niece, she had 3 names up in the air, and I only liked the one they (thankfully) went for. The other two (which I've forgotten by now, also thankfully) were super old, like ladies in a home would answer to them.

My own name is also something I wouldn't wish on any baby 😀
 
Oh no, and I told my mom to eat more avocados! Am I fuelling drought and Murder?

I'm not qualified to comment on the risk to the planet. I will say, anyone reading The Daily Mail (and other UK tabloids) on a regular basis risks lowering their IQ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nix
...And it was the French paparazzi who caused the accident.

You're mistaken. It was MI6, no question. Also, Diana survived the crash...but that was soon remedied.

Also, the hospital was only three miles away, so why did it take over an hour to get there...?
 
ILLYRIAN
ILLYRIAN
Trying to get anywhere quickly in the middle of Paris, especially at night is not going to happen, even then.
How many times do folk on this site have to be told to stop using capitals instead of stating the full name?
 
How many times do folk on this site have to be told to stop using capitals instead of stating the full name?
And you know that if you have a problem with a post or person to report it to the moderators.
 
Back
Top Bottom