Being on benefits adds absolutely nothing to this discussion.
She shouldn't have had a child ESPECIALLY because she was 14 and he was 12 when they had sex.
I was just saying they are on benefits and it's going to make it harder for them.
And if it's SOO natural as you say, then why ESPECIALLY if she's 14 and he's 12.
I thought it wasn't wrong and natural!?
Its not like any of this was planned and as for not having an abortion, well as I am firmly against abortion I think the correct decision was made there.
Yeah I'm against abortion too. But that's a whole other thing lol.
I think people are losing sight of the fact that these two children did something very natural, even for their age and are dealing with one of the natural consequences.
How is anything about 12-15 year old kids having sex natural?!
I don't know one person that will agree with that.
Yes, maybe they should have received better sex education, maybe one of their daddies should have sat them down a couple of years ago and explained to them what happens if you insert appendix a into slot b, but obviously these children have been failed on that side.
I agree.
They have done nothing wrong, and nothing that hasn't been done since humankind first climbed from the trees and started living in caves.
Theres nothing wrong with sex, but I think there is something wrong with little kids having little kids. And a lot of things have happened since humans first climbed on trees that is seriously not right now.