Thoughts on Emma Watson's Vanity Fair photo?

yet people go crazy over seeing a nipple, which by the way Emma Watson doesn't even show by some miracle!
Stop complaining about not seeing her nipple, you perv! Lol. Jk. I feel like maybe you've been starring at the picture too much. 😉. Lol. But yea people are desensitized to violence but make a big deal about nudity. Could be that some people link nudity with sex and sex is a sin or that nudity and sex should be private. Not to be shared with other people. But if people want to share it, doesn't mean you have to look at it. I think I did hear of some app that will censor shows and movies. Like if you don't want to see nudity, or hear swear words. I forget what it was called.
 
Nudity isn't the same as sex to me and I'd take either of them over violence. I'd rather see Swartzenager's penis than a horror film.
 
Stop complaining about not seeing her nipple, you perv! Lol. Jk. I feel like maybe you've been starring at the picture too much. 😉. Lol. But yea people are desensitized to violence but make a big deal about nudity. Could be that some people link nudity with sex and sex is a sin or that nudity and sex should be private. Not to be shared with other people. But if people want to share it, doesn't mean you have to look at it. I think I did hear of some app that will censor shows and movies. Like if you don't want to see nudity, or hear swear words. I forget what it was called.

haha eh it's not my fault I have good observation skills. But ya I agree, I think it's a cultural thing. Nudity is not nearly as big of a deal in French culture. If you watch French movies you'll often see non-sexualised nudity. And it's not like Hollywood productions where you only get good looking people getting naked on screen. In Quebec, some shows that play at 8pm and that are made for a general audience also show nudity. They will show breasts and butts and it's not a big deal.

But eh, it's cool that they have that app, that solves the problem for those people who don't want to see nudity. I think it might be the same app that will also censor triggering stuff, or at least warn you if a show contains triggering stuff (like rape or violence for example). At least that's what I heard they were trying to make.
 
Funny story, the lady I live with, who is like 60, is all about seeing full frontal men, though. I was like 😱. Cause we were watching a movie and they showed the guys butt and she asked why can't we ever see the front. lol. Not to mention she insisted that Arnold Schwarzenegger shows his penis in Terminator or Conan, so then we had to go and look for it in those movies. Thankfully (for me) he does not. lol. So some people just want to see naked people, and others are a bit more conservative. If you want naked people well, ...there's porn? lol. Or Game of Thrones I guess. lol. And thanks to Blaze I now know about the guy from Black Sails 😉. lol.

I just want to ask something out of genuine curiosity, and I'd appreciate honest answers (from anyone). One reason I found so much about sexuality confusing is because so many people lie about it. If you can't be honest, then please don't answer (again, speaking to a general audience). And I ask out of genuine curiosity, not seeking an excuse to jump on some soapbox. Human nature intrigues me, and I know I can't understand others by projecting my own inclinations, desires, and sensibilities onto the rest of humanity.

Is the sight of a limp male genitalia (not sure what words are acceptable here so I'll go with that) normally a turn on for those attracted to men?

I'd have thought that arousal sparks arousal, and a man with limp genitals isn't excited. And there is a view of A.S. genitals in Terminator (at 5:26 on my dvd) though it's not a closeup, not well lit, and easily missed (and he's just walking up like a robot). I'd just be surprised that inspired erotic longings (unless there were other non-erotic factors for enjoying the sight, though those non-erotic factors could be eroticized in certain individuals). So if it's normal for that to be a turn on, I'd like to know, please.
 
Perhaps it's worth noting for myself that I haven't equated nudity with sex and am generally confused by the idea...clothing can actually be far more sexy if done right (and depends on a person's tastes, of course). Nudist colonies and beaches don't break out into orgies that I'm aware of. When I heard of a woman winning a lawsuit because she got into a sauna naked with some adults when she was a teen (they may have strongly pressured her into it, in which case I'm inclined to support her lawsuit) I joked I got naked with the wrong people as a kid as they didn't have enough money worth suing them over (it was not eroticized in any sense). And yet there are those who see nudity as sex. I even overheard 2 women at a fitness center I used to go to that they didn't use the sauna out of fear of lesbians, and as a lesbian myself I know I'd have raised a stink if someone came onto me in the sauna.

I see it all the time in entertainment. There's this one movie in which the most disturbing moment is a man burns the eye of a mouse with a cigarette (and it's graphic) before throwing the said mouse into the fire. I hope that was all fake, but given the closeup and that it was the 1970s I fear that may have been done for real. But that (or many other things, including poisonings) aren't complained about. Rather, it's that a 17-year-old boy (IIRC) has sex with a 13-year-old girl (note, the boy is disabled from polio, and the 13-year-old poisoner is much more scary, world wise, and in control) and it's romantic, and also the profanity the kids use. Sheesh. 'Course many get more upset over Fake-Cordy and Connor having sex than of them murdering an innocent woman together, so I guess that's about the same. That's just how people are. I have my theories on why but I'm too tired to share them.
 
Last edited:
I just want to ask something out of genuine curiosity, and I'd appreciate honest answers (from anyone). One reason I found so much about sexuality confusing is because so many people lie about it. If you can't be honest, then please don't answer (again, speaking to a general audience). And I ask out of genuine curiosity, not seeking an excuse to jump on some soapbox. Human nature intrigues me, and I know I can't understand others by projecting my own inclinations, desires, and sensibilities onto the rest of humanity.

Is the sight of a limp male genitalia (not sure what words are acceptable here so I'll go with that) normally a turn on for those attracted to men?

I'd have thought that arousal sparks arousal, and a man with limp genitals isn't excited. And there is a view of A.S. genitals in Terminator (at 5:26 on my dvd) though it's not a closeup, not well lit, and easily missed (and he's just walking up like a robot). I'd just be surprised that inspired erotic longings (unless there were other non-erotic factors for enjoying the sight, though those non-erotic factors could be eroticized in certain individuals). So if it's normal for that to be a turn on, I'd like to know, please.
 
Perhaps it's worth noting for myself that I haven't equated nudity with sex and am generally confused by the idea...clothing can actually be far more sexy if done right (and depends on a person's tastes, of course). Nudist colonies and beaches don't break out into orgies that I'm aware of. When I heard of a woman winning a lawsuit because she got into a sauna naked with some adults when she was a teen (they may have strongly pressured her into it, in which case I'm inclined to support her lawsuit) I joked I got naked with the wrong people as a kid as they didn't have enough money worth suing them over (it was not eroticized in any sense). And yet there are those who see nudity as sex. I even overheard 2 women at a fitness center I used to go to that they didn't use the sauna out of fear of lesbians, and as a lesbian myself I know I'd have raised a stink if someone came onto me in the sauna.

I see it all the time in entertainment. There's this one movie in which the most disturbing moment is a man burns the eye of a mouse with a cigarette (and it's graphic) before throwing the said mouse into the fire. I hope that was all fake, but given the closeup and that it was the 1970s I fear that may have been done for real. But that (or many other things, including poisonings) aren't complained about. Rather, it's that a 17-year-old boy (IIRC) has sex with a 13-year-old girl (note, the boy is disabled from polio, and the 13-year-old poisoner is much more scary, world wise, and in control) and it's romantic, and also the profanity the kids use. Sheesh. 'Course many get more upset over Fake-Cordy and Connor having sex than of them murdering an innocent woman together, so I guess that's about the same. That's just how people are. I have my theories on why but I'm too tired to share them.

Ohkay so as a bisexual woman (I generally date more guys than I do girls.) I would not find a limp male genitalia attractive or arousing. On that note I don't find erect male genitalia arousing either. Part of the reason I do not understand why people feel the need to send willy pictures, I mean sure your proud and stuff its just not going to do much for me, I found more enjoyment editing faces on to them and adding a little hat and cigar.
 
T
thrasherpix
HAHAHAHA! And I also find those pix (and online statements of what one is doing to them) very strange, but I usually joke about it, like telling one YT commenter to wash his keyboard rather than making someone else do it.
Is the sight of a limp male genitalia (not sure what words are acceptable here so I'll go with that) normally a turn on for those attracted to men?
Nope. Male parts are not attractive (sorry men) unless it's sexy time. Occasionally if the guy is really hot and we'll endowed that can be a turn on, but the actual look of a penis is not a turn on.
I'd have thought that arousal sparks arousal, and a man with limp genitals isn't excited. And there is a view of A.S. genitals in Terminator (at 5:26 on my dvd) though it's not a closeup, not well lit, and easily missed (and he's just walking up like a robot). I'd just be surprised that inspired erotic longings (unless there were other non-erotic factors for enjoying the sight, though those non-erotic factors could be eroticized in certain individuals). So if it's normal for that to be a turn on, I'd like to know, please.
it's different for everyone, though. The 60 year old lady I live with is lonely and easily gets excited over attractive men. I'm assuming she had a crush on young Arnie back in the day, so she enjoyed seeing him naked. Me, not so much. Lol.
 
@Blaze You see the paths you've led us down now?😛

Anyway if i can reclaim my composure😉 I agree with you. But you do have to bare in mind that because women have constantly had to play catch up with men when it comes to equality, and because over the years it has been the female body objectified much more than than the male one then I can see where this sort of thing can be seen as a backwards step. Its just that in this case I don't think there's anything to be getting upset over.
 
Blaze
Blaze
Lmao I take no blame in the direction this went.
Fuffy Baith
Fuffy Baith
Haha. Yes, I blame Blaze too! Bad Blazey!lol
ILLYRIAN
ILLYRIAN
Makes you wonder what our little Blazey has been cooking up in the laboratory
Gross dude! Could you at least wait for a decent hour for to come out with that sort of smut?

I meant thematically not literally putting the two things together. 'Cause otherwise that would indeed be gross.
Or are you just embarrassed by the word wiener?
 
ILLYRIAN
ILLYRIAN
Now that is odd, having GwenRaiden and Fuffy Baith say they like this, but what do they like, putting two things together? About it being gross or the word wiener?
Or heavens forbid, the gross wiener!
Emma Watson's nipples to Arnie's wiener.
Well this thread took a word turn. Lol I still blame @Blaze 😛 lol. OK maybe I had some involvement. 😳 lol

Back to Emma Watson though, I saw some behind the scenes stuff on YouTube for Beauty and the Beast, and I'm even more excited for it now. I think she'll be great, and I saw a part that's not in the trailers that suggest this version will also bring in elements from the original fairytale. 😀oh I'm so excited! Lol. I don't think this controversy will have any affect on the movies box office.
 
thetopher
thetopher
It's gotten good reviews so far. Good acting, more songs, more backstory. :)
What was that? Do mine eyes deceive me? Well this thread took a turn for the word? About Emma Watson's behind the scenes stuff on Beauty and the Beast. Given the haircut she pouted I take it you are referring to her as the Beast?
 
Fuffy Baith
Fuffy Baith
Lol. I meant weird.
Yeah I read a review of it the other day, and it gave the film three stars and said Watson did a good job.
 
Great interview! She really is shocked, as she should be. Like she said her boobs got nothing to do with being a feminist. I like her turning to Dan Stevens in confusion. Lol.
 
ILLYRIAN
ILLYRIAN
So you may have meant weird, okay I accept that, but can we still lame Blaze?
She should be shocked that her wobbly danglies are a measure of her being a feminist as her wobbly danglies neither wobble nor dangle.
I will now go and breath into a large brown paper bag.
Umm, breathe heavily and er er num num nummies!
 
Fuffy Baith
Fuffy Baith
Lol. Yee, we all blame Blaze now.
Back
Top Bottom