Thoughts on Emma Watson's Vanity Fair photo?

Oh really, so you think that Pom is a slang term for a British soldier, wrong totally wrong.
I never said it was slang for a British soldier. I never even uttered the word soldier. You did that. And I do believe you are mistaken about "It [slang] is however specifically used for insulting language."
 
If you want to make people aware you never mentioned the word soldier that is up to you. Even though the word Pom became popularised when used in conjunction with a British soldier. And yes slang is used as a method of increasing the negative tones in speech or the written word. You might not believe it but it doesn't mean you are right.
 
If you want to make people aware you never mentioned the word soldier that is up to you.
Wasn't trying to make people aware, just you, as you were the one that said I said that.

Even though the word Pom became popularised when used in conjunction with a British soldier.
Cool. But refresh my memory where, other than in your post where you contradicted me, did I ever talk about the origin of the word? That would be never. Because no one really friggin cares.

And yes slang is used as a method of increasing the negative tones in speech or the written word. You might not believe it but it doesn't mean you are right.
And no, slang isn't used as a method of increasing the negative tones in speech or the written word. You might feel otherwise but it doesn't mean you are right. Maybe you are confusing slang with another word. Or me with someone that really gives a damn anymore as I am done with you now.
 
Oh my god Blaze, I am so sorry, I thought you were gay. And I just went and had a sex change operation.
 
I don't think she should have done it at this time, just as she's promoting a Disney movie and this doesn't really go with the Disney image, had she done it in a couple of months when all the promotion was over I think they would have been far less fuss about it. That's not to say other Disney stars haven't done shoots like this, and probably around promotion time too! It's a fine line and yes she's not showing anything, but it's also not a needed promotional shoot for her
 
The Toronto Star ran the picture with an article called "Emma Watson's contradictions" and on the next page titled "Celebrity feminists wage war on each other". The subheading said, "That stick the actress says other feminists used to beat her with? She once used it on Beyoncé." The male columnist, Vinay Menon, noted that Emma had made the following comment about Beyoncé a few years ago:

"I felt her message felt very conflicted in the sense that, on the one hand she is putting herself in the category of a feminist, you know this very strong woman and she has that beautiful speech in one of her songs, but then the camera, it felt very male, such a male voyeuristic experience for her."

I have no doubt other columnists are making comments of some sort and she is getting coverage that would cost thousands of dollars to buy in a newspaper. There is an old saying that there is no such thing as bad publicity and she is getting good coverage by being almost uncovered.
 
Oh my god Blaze, I am so sorry, I thought you were gay. And I just went and had a sex change operation.

This is a bit uncalled for and unnecessary. What does this have to do with anything?
 
Blaze
Blaze
Illyrian clearly just wishes he had a chance with me :P

1cda44ea9114c39e8d4b99010097b68a.gif

sorry.gif

tumblr_inline_mkouckkSLF1qz4rgp.gif
 
I saw an ad on tv for Beauty and the Beast today. I think I might check it out one day, if only to see Emma Watson looking like a beautiful disney princess, cos she can totally pull that off with what I saw! Is it her singing too?

And then I get all confused about that - cos I am drawn to it to watch the pretty dance in the pretty dress with the pretty songs.
 
I see it more as a fashion type shoot rather then a raunchy one. She probably wanted publicity anyway whatever she did so she got it
 
When I first saw that picture, it didn't seem risque to me at all. I didn't even give it a second thought. People have been showing that much skin in photoshoots for 50 years. I find it bewildering that some people have manufactured such a nonsensical fake controversy over it.

Honestly, an alien looking in at our world right now would assume that we as a species are capable of self-righteous anger and not much more. It's getting very depressing.
 
I appreciated this take on it:

The Photo of Emma Watson’s breasts that caused a Feminist Twitter Storm.

The part I appreciated:

But why is this the one image we are all paying attention to out of a selection of artistic (and, incidentally, fully clothed) shots taken of Watson by Tim Walker? Why does this image with a partial show of breast garner more attention than Watson’s thoughtful discussion of the artifice of Hollywood, the gender pay gap, a love of literature and becoming a certified meditation teacher among other things?

I think Emma Watson just unintentionally made a pretty powerful point about why we still need feminism right there.



And as far as my personal thoughts, I don't think it's that different from say this:

Congressional Candidate Alejandra Campoverdi on Previously Modeling for Maxim: I’m Proud of Who I Am

Both those instances (and there's plenty more like both), whether done as an act of misogyny or (ironically) feminism shows why actual feminism is still needed.
 
Back
Top Bottom