Good point, there are extenuating circumstances. Getting his soul back and being scorned by Darla as a disgusting abomination 🙂 (gotta love the reverse morals) he must have been very confused and i get it why he tried to compromise.
But taking a life when you're perfectly aware that what you do is wrong, adding to your guilt consciously, is worse than trying to do good and messing up, like he did in the Ats finale.
In those long days when he catalogued his sins i wonder which he himself considered the worst? Angel is sentimental, so probably the ones where he took the lives of people who had a meaningful life ahead of them or people who were missed by their loved ones.
Does anything really beat Twilight? That was certainly the most messed up thing he has ever done.
What about trying ti strangle Wesley after he found out he tried to steal Connor?
I think the big assumption here is that the Buffyverse is real and the writers don't exist. No matter how inconsistent a character seems to be, we have to find an in-story view, and can't retreat for a meta explanation.I don't really see most of the options on this poll as evil. Some have major meta reasons and others I completely understand. Some things not on this poll are simple character assasinations.
And normally I subscribe to that. But I need in-show reasons in order for that to work. Sadly the writers are so blatant about that, specially in later Seasons, that I just can't suspend my disbelieve since it's clearly a meta reason. That Spike remains unstaked from S4-6 makes absolutely no sense whatsoever in-show. Time and again he betrayed and tried to kill/rape the Scoobies or random people and no dusting. And there is no reason given to me in the story as to why (chip doesn't count). By S5 they go so far as put in a meta comment about the absurdity of Spike still being around (Riley and the plastic stake). In Crush Buffy lets Harmony, Dru and Spike walk off without moving a muscle. The hell? In S4 Harmony turns her back on Buffy to yack endlessly and Buffy doesn't move to stake her. Again wth? And I know the reason for that is the writers wanting to keep those characters around. Because if Buffy was allowed to be in character in those situation and make good of her job description 'Vampire SLAYER' those vamps would be dust.I think the big assumption here is that the Buffyverse is real and the writers don't exist. No matter how inconsistent a character seems to be, we have to find an in-story view, and can't retreat for a meta explanation.
Otherwise we can say something like "Warren is good. It's just the writers screwed him up by writing those bad deeds he did."
For the sheer magnitude of death, destruction, and mayhem actually accomplished, nothing else comes even close to Twilight. That surpasses even Angelus' plot to destroy the world in Season 2, and with no more real excuse that that a talking dog made him believe that it could beat the combined power of Buffy, all of her friends and allies, and a space ship full of giant cockroaches. Okay, maybe he didn't know about the cockroaches, but even without them, he knew about Buffy, and he knew from experience that she has a consistent habit of beating any and all Big Bads that cross her path. Then, killing Giles was just the icing on the cake, and the excuse of, "well, it was actually Twilight that did that," doesn't hold water, because, unlike Spike in Season 7, Angel willingly, while in full control of his faculties, struck the bargain to destroy the Buffyverse, therefore he is directly responsible for any and all actions performed by himself while under Twilight's influence. Not even a plea of, "It got to me while I was still delirious and overcome with guilt from regaining my soul," would work here.
but even without them, he knew about Buffy, and he knew from experience that she has a consistent habit of beating any and all Big Bads that cross her path.