What should the legal voting age be?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You don't think parents would force them to? I certainly can see that.

Eh, not really. Given that less than 50% of adults can bother to vote, it's hard to imagine there suddenly being a significant number of parents forcing their kids to vote. I mean they could try that now with their 18 and older kids couldn't they?

I find the attitude towards old people rather disturbing. As if they haven’t invested in and helped build the society they’re voting in. As if many of them don’t have kids or grandkids they want the best possible future for. Being ”on your way out ” doesnt mean your vote is invalid or somehow less significant than a younger persons.

Just to play devil's advocate, the same could be said about the attitude towards young voters. Just because they are young doesn't mean they are incapable of thinking for themselves and caring about the future of the society in which they live in and are an active part of.
 
Skanky Vamp
Skanky Vamp
I dunno. I could certainly see parents forcing their kids. But maybe the attitude is different out there.
DeepBlueJoy
DeepBlueJoy
and there are husbands forcing wives and people forcing elders to vote the way they want... but such behavior is always going to exist, but the fact of the private/secret ballot makes it less likely that they can control the vote of others.
Eh, not really. Given that less than 50% of adults can bother to vote, it's hard to imagine there suddenly being a significant number of parents forcing their kids to vote. I mean they could try that now with their 18 and older kids couldn't they?



Just to play devil's advocate, the same could be said about the attitude towards young voters. Just because they are young doesn't mean they are incapable of thinking for themselves and caring about the future of the society in which they live in and are an active part of.

Fair enough. However, old people know what it is like to be young and can understand their perspective. Young people cannot know what it is like to be old, so their perspective is by default more limited.

And I never said they were incapable of thinking for themselves, I did point out that their cognitive functions aren’t finished developing yet, but that is not the same as saying they’re incapable. I think it is a factor which counts against them however, in this hypothetical, along with a number of other factors. 🙂
 
Much of the criticism with Blair was the sense he dragged us into a conflict with a lack of evidence to justify it.

and 'lack of evidence' is a polite way of saying 'outright lying.' Up until the Iraq war Tony B was massively popular.
I don't think we should stop old people from voting. At 60 you could potentially live another 40 years. At 18 you could hit by a bus the next day. To pretend that older people aren't still invested in their country - or have a stake in the future - is wrong. Plus it would open the door to a whole raft of abuses over pensions. Old people are often vulnerable and need to be protected. Disenfranchising them is not the way. But in once in a lifetime votes - that will have repercussions for decades to come, the voices of the young should matter more. They are the ones most likely to bear the brunt of it.

the initial push for Brexit came from the government wanting to eliminate the tax on feminine hygiene products but they were not allowed to do that as members of the EU.

Um no - it really really didn't. The Eurosceptic wing of the tory party have been around for decades - since Thatcher, at least. John Major resigned in 1995 and held a leadership contest to shut them up. Deadwood Redwood was the Eurosceptic he ran against. Nigel Farage has been a stalking horse for years and years now - and the threat of UKIP taking the harder right tory voters is what frightened the centre tory party. Brexit is a tory civil war. Remain was supposed to win to shut the bastards up once and for all. But Cameron loused it up - and now the party is even more divided. (Literally the ERG cannot even agree on whether or not to send in their letters of no confidence - we now have divisions within divisions.) The rest of Britain is paying the price, and our economy is tanking, and our rights are being taken away, whilst the tories play a grey suited version of Game of Thrones. It has shit all to do with tampons.
 
DeepBlueJoy
DeepBlueJoy
the old and the young both have a right to a say. no one wants to deprive elders. Expanding the vote does not deprive elders rights. It simply enhances the rights of the young.
The Bronze
The Bronze
It's Game of Thrones with just 2 characters. Either a Little Finger or a Joffrey
Mr Trick
Mr Trick
Oh yeah! Outright lying is the phrase I was looking for!
Yeah why would anyone have anything bad to say about a potential war criminal and a pathological liar 😕
okay if anyone is a war criminal it is Obama he is Racist to white people and he hates Jewish people. but then you most likely would say he is not but a racist but I am sure if Obama got his way Jews have died in the Holocaust. and I am Jewish so go on say what you will about me.
 
DeepBlueJoy
DeepBlueJoy
that is ridiculous.
GraceK
GraceK
Alex Jones is that you?
And whose to say they shouldn't be attacked? I'm in favour of peaceful constructive debate. Much of the criticism with Blair was the sense he dragged us into a conflict with a lack of evidence to justify it.
but most of the people who attacked Tony Blair hated the Jewish people when I said I am not getting into the debate they said I must be Jewish I am but I did not tell them I am Jewish.
 
okay if anyone is a war criminal it is Obama he is Racist to white people and he hates Jewish people. but then you most likely would say he is not but a racist but I am sure if Obama got his way Jews have died in the Holocaust. and I am Jewish so go on say what you will about me.
That's incoherent nonsense I'm afraid.
 
I don't think old people know much about being a young citizen today. We have politics, because society and the people within it change.
I am sure if Obama got his way Jews have died in the Holocaust
Yes, I am sure it was only the fact of him not being born yet that stopped Obama from killing all the Jews in the Holocaust.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
okay if anyone is a war criminal it is Obama he is Racist to white people and he hates Jewish people. but then you most likely would say he is not but a racist but I am sure if Obama got his way Jews have died in the Holocaust. and I am Jewish so go on say what you will about me.

Utter nonsense. Did you get this from Alex Jones, or has the fake news on right got even worse than I realized?

Offhand, and also skipping what I know FOX and the like did a major disinfo campaign about to avoid the complications of that, Obama was against the idea of black reparations being made (and that if some plan could be made to work that it would need to help everyone suffering regardless of race or ancestry), despite that he earmarked millions for Holocaust survivors.
 
I speak in Joseph's defence, I found it very hard to have a go at anything to said because I couldn't understand much of what he wrote, his ability to write English is so very poor. I take it English is a second language.
 
You don't think parents would force them to? I certainly can see that.

This is my major question. Many are in the workforce at least by 18, but not many are out of the nest at 16. In a place with forced voting, I know dozens of people who just vote the way their parents do, because their parents are rich and able to house them into their 30's. They do not see the need for increases to dismil pension payments because they are looked after in the family home until their mid 30's (so far). They do not understand what has happened to medicare because their parents insurance covers them. They do not worry themselves with property or environmental issues because mummy and daddy have a wing of the house dedicated to them. And retic on the pony paddocks

I understand the way we live in families is changing in Australia, but it is pretty shocking how many are still treating job search payments as pocket money cos mum and dad cover the rent, food and utilities. Yet they are voting away the rights of those in extreme poverty with the judgement of "well if they tried harder..."

I dont do politics (my post probably sounds as rambly as josephs) but I feel people need to be somewhat living in the world before they get the chance to vote on it. At the very least, out of the school system that can greatly influence them. Perhaps there can be more encouragement of questioning policies instead of going with the flow. I mean, look at the traction hashtags get...
 
T
thrasherpix
I believe Australia's voting system is superior to ours and would also combat both voter suppression and fraud, and though I can see it's far from perfect, you showed me another problem of it.
Just so you know. I had my first argument about apartheid when I was 7. When I was 23 I found myself in the space of 2 days having discussions with two "college educated" Americans who'd never HEARD of apartheid. What you know, and how you are able to form opinions and have understanding about those things depends on what you're exposed to.

Should I have had the vote when I was 7? Probably not. Emotionally, I was too labile to make a decent decision, but mentally, I already held views that made sense to the adults I was arguing with, and that in retrospect, I pretty much still hold. I already knew the value of the vote, freedom and human rights.

Yes, I think that those who are young do need some protection from certain adult responsibilities and activities, and even more so from adult predation -- and smoking and much of the other vices kids fall into are often a form of adult predation. There's a reason they call them drug 'pushers' (at least they used to) And tobacco 'cool' that derives at least in part from advertising -- that is a form of GROOMING every bit as pernicious as the grooming perpetuated on kids by the pedophile behind the trench coat (or behind their own front door). When we shield people below 18 from certain 'rights'/activities, such as drinking, we're protecting them from activities that are INHERENTLY harmful - we are saying wait to choose these things until you are emotionally more ready and can decide. People who don't start abusing drugs and alcohol before majority, get hooked at lower rates. What we start doing in our teens (like smoking) often follows us for the rest of our lives.

Voting is a GOOD habit to develop. Voting is not one of those adult responsibilities they should be protected against because voting is not INTRINSICALLY harmful.

Developing a civic conscience is vital.

Voting isn't something the young should be barred from because voting is ALWAYS FOR THE FUTURE.

Barring the young from voting, therefore, primarily protects the interests of the rich and older people.

"But young people will vote for all sorts of trivial things!"

Unlikely!! Young people aren't in a position to make 'stupid policy' (we adults are busy doing that all by ourselves!). But seriously, you need to get to at least 25, or 30 to be in a position to formulate policy. In many places you can't hold office before a certain age, and that is not unreasonable... Even where there's no age restriction, logistically, it's difficult. Most people simply lack the education, experience and the ability to develop the influence to make major policy before they get to 30 or even 40. Thus, by definition, whatever young voters are voting for is tempered by the fact of it being decided and formulated by older people with life experience.

The young are the people for whom FUTURE stretches longest.

Consequences of the future that could destroy their world or that affect whether they get education, health care, rights, decent jobs, freedoms, etc. - these are things that young adults need the right to have a say in.

Not all young people will feel able or ready to have a say -- it is part of why some don't vote now -- but it should be their option, and civic education really DOES need improvement in our schools. As someone else said, if the choice were raising or lowering the voting age, I'd be for lowering. If someone's going to take their rights permanently, they should definitely have a say in it.

A bunch of old xenophobes who already 'got theirs' should not be the ONLY people to decide what happens to those young people for 60 even 80+ years, when those old xenophobes may have at best, another 5 or 10 years and will probably spend significant portions of those years cared for by some underpaid young person, and won't care if the water's undrinkable, the oceans are boiling and the air is too thick to breathe... because none of that will happen in their lifetimes, but their children and grandchildren? They're likely gonna grow up in a world without tigers, and maybe even one without edible fish.

And no, i would not stop older people from voting either. It is still their world. At least for a little while. I know of nowhere that there's a senility test for voting. I believe that most 16 year olds are at least as capable as the average 80 year old mentally... and we don't stop 80 year olds from voting.
 
T
thrasherpix
Just wanted you to know I appreciated how clear your thoughts were, it looks like you spent some time on them. If this is your instant response then it's even more amazing!
thrasherpix I believe Australia's voting system is superior to ours and would also combat both voter suppression and fraud, and though I can see it's far from perfect, you showed me another problem of it.

Yeah, I agree, its not an inferior system. The voter age is 18, kids leave school at 17/18.
No political set up will ever work for me personally, I'd rage about anything given the chance. I only trust one dude to fix it, but am more concerned with living as close as I can to a universal/cosmic truth. We certainly get more chance of that in australia than some other places. In spite of the politics. Generally, peeps be good. Its not all bad being ruled by the crown. Currently we have a bunch of outdated, overaged and excessively wealthy men being shuffled around to play prime minister and get a nice retirement before the next generation calls them out on the BS. That day is coming.
.

Dont get me wrong, I am thankful for the chance to vote, but do not think we should be fined if we do not feel we have the capacity to understand what we are voting for. In hindsight, I should not have enrolled.

What is the future of voting anyway? Typical voting stations and booths seem like a terror threat. Will it be online? I bet you'll get a bunch of people with hangovers thankful for that. And we'll need younger voters to tell us which buttons to press! Maybe you'll get an increase in voters, but less considering what the votes mean. Oh wait, what is a well informed vote? ... This is why I dont do politics haha. Carry on 🙂
 
but I am sure if Obama got his way Jews have died in the Holocaust. and I am Jewish so go on say what you will about me.

This is a pretty outrageous claim. Please be careful about making such statements, you may strongly dislike Obama, but this is slander.
I feel inclined to remove it, but as it has been commented on already I'll let it be.
 
For regular elections I would say 18 is fine. That is when you are legally recognised as an adult so that should be when you start to vote. HOWEVER for once in a life time referendums that will affect the future of your country for decades to come *pointed cough* then it should be dropped to 16 - because the outcome is going to affect 16 year olds for far longer than it is going to affect the over 65s intent on buggering up their future. It shouldn't go lower than 16, though - because there has to be a cut off point somewhere - and 16 is mature enough to understand the basics, younger than that and it's more likely to be children voting the way their parents tell them to. Up until recently in Britain - you could leave school at 16 (I think now it's 17). That's when you're old enough to (legally) get a Saturday job, you can smoke, have sex and play the lottery at that age. If the establishment believes you're compos mentis enough for all that, then you're mature enough to vote in a once in a life time referendum. However as you're not yet considered compos mentis enough to drive or drink (and never at the same time!) it isn't strictly necessary (or hypocritical) to allow under 18s to vote in local and general elections - as they will come round again and they will have a later opportunity to engage in the political future of their country.
having said that - I would like to see referendums made illegal in Britain (barring indie refs, I suppose). We do not need them, they are not a part of our parliamentary system and so are open to massive abuses. I think they're illegal in Germany?

Below 21 you are influenced by your parents , by friends , by what paper you read ? and in the UK the British Brainwashing Corporation I left school at 15 at that age was I thinking about my future the country's future, no , more about fashion and girls , why or how could I have the same grasp on life as some one in their 50's or 60s
It is popular to discredit elderly people , Why ? because it does not fit in with somebody,s ideal , political influence , a lot of elderly people have work long hours for poor pay, its because of them younger people can enjoy the benefits of a much better education , more time off etc ,
In a lot of societies the elderly are looked after there opinions are sort, remember you may be young now but you will not all way's be , hopefully you to will have children and grand children , and be wise enough not to believe the men in suites who are after only one thing themselves

You don't think parents would force them to? I certainly can see that.

Maybe no force but influence maybe? certainly it appears in that in society's where religion is more prevalent
 
This is my major question. Many are in the workforce at least by 18, but not many are out of the nest at 16. In a place with forced voting, I know dozens of people who just vote the way their parents do, because their parents are rich and able to house them into their 30's. They do not see the need for increases to dismil pension payments because they are looked after in the family home until their mid 30's (so far). They do not understand what has happened to medicare because their parents insurance covers them. They do not worry themselves with property or environmental issues because mummy and daddy have a wing of the house dedicated to them. And retic on the pony paddocks

I understand the way we live in families is changing in Australia, but it is pretty shocking how many are still treating job search payments as pocket money cos mum and dad cover the rent, food and utilities. Yet they are voting away the rights of those in extreme poverty with the judgement of "well if they tried harder..."

I dont do politics (my post probably sounds as rambly as josephs) but I feel people need to be somewhat living in the world before they get the chance to vote on it. At the very least, out of the school system that can greatly influence them. Perhaps there can be more encouragement of questioning policies instead of going with the flow. I mean, look at the traction hashtags get...

Its only a problem voting the way your parents do if you don't actually know anything about the politics of the party or its leader. I think parents can be a good way to get into voting and politics as a whole.
 
Below 21 you are influenced by your parents , by friends , by what paper you read ? and in the UK the British Brainwashing Corporation I left school at 15 at that age was I thinking about my future the country's future, no , more about fashion and girls , why or how could I have the same grasp on life as some one in their 50's or 60s
It is popular to discredit elderly people , Why ? because it does not fit in with somebody,s ideal , political influence , a lot of elderly people have work long hours for poor pay, its because of them younger people can enjoy the benefits of a much better education , more time off etc ,
In a lot of societies the elderly are looked after there opinions are sort, remember you may be young now but you will not all way's be , hopefully you to will have children and grand children ,

This shows a lot of contempt for young people. Maybe younger then a 21 you were that frivolous and stupid - but by 21 I had spent the last three years living in a different city to my parents and had completed my university degree. At 18 In was deemed old enough to move out of my home and stand on my own two feet - by society and by my parents. I had qualifications and had completed all mandatory education 2 years previously and had chosen to continue at school. I was old enough and mature enough to vote, thank you. At my time at Uni we were at the very beginning of student fees being increased and there were great pushes in halls for us all to contact our mp and write to the education secretary etc to try and stop it. The war in Iraq was brand new and we were all pretty angry about it. We were politically engaged.

And I have said we shouldn't stop old people voting (someone suggested that and I explained why that was a terrible idea) BUT in a referendum, which will only happen once and will affect job prospects for decades to come - the voices of the retired just should not count the same. Of course they should be counted - but the voices of the young should carry more weight, in such a particular instance, as it is their jobs and future on the line. There was a poll on brexit that showed the majority of leavers were happy to lose their jobs as long as we left the EU. Sound a strange sacrifice to make? Well consider this, the majority of leave voters were over 65 - they were retired. When they said they would be happy to lose their job to brexit they knew full well it would never ever affect them. They voted away other people's futures, other people's careers.

Around the world things may be different - but the over 65s of Britain have had an easier run of it than any other generation previously or since. They were born after the war, so never had that deprivation. They did not have to do national service. Jobs for life were a thing. They could get grants to go to university - and leave debt free. Mortgages were reasonable, they could afford a home and a family with only one parent working. None of that exists now. Thatcher was brought into government by the under 35 vote. The under 35 vote in 1979 translates to the over 65 vote in 2016. The one generation has repeatedly voted, throughout their lives, to pull the ladder up behind them and leave the world a worse place than they found it. And no - not all old people - I was recently on a march with a very elderly gentleman, who had served in the army, and was out marching to prove not all over 65s voted for a worse future for their grand children. But plenty of our current crop of elderly voters are making very poor decisions based on rose tinted nostalgia for a time that never was, a dollop of racism and a healthy contempt for the young.
I'm afraid people do not always get smarter and wiser as they get older. Stupid people are stupid people from birth to death. Bigotry, racism and xenophobia do not go away with age.
Yes, young people have no idea what it is to be old - they have no way of knowing. That's not their fault. But old people forget what it's like to be young. And that is their fault.

and be wise enough not to believe the men in suites who are after only one thing themselves

How anything I've written on this thread hasn't already shown that I already believe this... I do not know.
 
Myheadsgonenumb, what the F?
The over 65's of Britain have had an easier run of it than any other generation previously or since. They were born after the WW2 so never had the deprivation? what a load of bull, where did you get that load of crap from?
I was born in Coventry UK in 1955 when England was getting back onto its knees after the deprivation the British people suffered after the war as they supported the German people as well. How long after the war did the ration books exist for, the Ration Books ceased to be in effect in Britain on the 4th of July 1954!
 
Last edited:
This shows a lot of contempt for young people. Maybe younger then a 21 you were that frivolous and stupid - but by 21 I had spent the last three years living in a different city to my parents and had completed my university degree. At 18 In was deemed old enough to move out of my home and stand on my own two feet - by society and by my parents. I had qualifications and had completed all mandatory education 2 years previously and had chosen to continue at school. I was old enough and mature enough to vote, thank you. At my time at Uni we were at the very beginning of student fees being increased and there were great pushes in halls for us all to contact our mp and write to the education secretary etc to try and stop it. The war in Iraq was brand new and we were all pretty angry about it. We were politically engaged.

And I have said we shouldn't stop old people voting (someone suggested that and I explained why that was a terrible idea) BUT in a referendum, which will only happen once and will affect job prospects for decades to come - the voices of the retired just should not count the same. Of course they should be counted - but the voices of the young should carry more weight, in such a particular instance, as it is their jobs and future on the line. There was a poll on brexit that showed the majority of leavers were happy to lose their jobs as long as we left the EU. Sound a strange sacrifice to make? Well consider this, the majority of leave voters were over 65 - they were retired. When they said they would be happy to lose their job to brexit they knew full well it would never ever affect them. They voted away other people's futures, other people's careers.

Around the world things may be different - but the over 65s of Britain have had an easier run of it than any other generation previously or since. They were born after the war, so never had that deprivation. They did not have to do national service. Jobs for life were a thing. They could get grants to go to university - and leave debt free. Mortgages were reasonable, they could afford a home and a family with only one parent working. None of that exists now. Thatcher was brought into government by the under 35 vote. The under 35 vote in 1979 translates to the over 65 vote in 2016. The one generation has repeatedly voted, throughout their lives, to pull the ladder up behind them and leave the world a worse place than they found it. And no - not all old people - I was recently on a march with a very elderly gentleman, who had served in the army, and was out marching to prove not all over 65s voted for a worse future for their grand children. But plenty of our current crop of elderly voters are making very poor decisions based on rose tinted nostalgia for a time that never was, a dollop of racism and a healthy contempt for the young.
I'm afraid people do not always get smarter and wiser as they get older. Stupid people are stupid people from birth to death. Bigotry, racism and xenophobia do not go away with age.
Yes, young people have no idea what it is to be old - they have no way of knowing. That's not their fault. But old people forget what it's like to be young. And that is their fault.



How anything I've written on this thread hasn't already shown that I already believe this... I do not know.

My god what a horrid little FASCIST are you , over 65 don't count , what next put the coloured people back picking cotton, and of course the Jewish problem....maybe you can solve that
Poor you still at school at 21 no doubt mum and dad are still chipping in to keep you ?
Let me tell you about the over 65, they started their lives with food rationing......things you take for granted today today like fresh fruit was non existent or a best a luxury right though the fifty's ,
The vast majority had no chance of going to university, if they fail;ed 11 plus then they generally had a much poorer education than there high school brothers , leaving school at 15 the best that was on offer was a apprenticeship ( 15 not 21 that's 6 years more paying in not taking out ) Thatcher came in in 1979 so a 65 year old would have been 26 , a lot of people older than 26 , voted for Thatcher and they had been though a lot tougher times including 2 world wars ,
You are under the impression that over 65 want to go back to there youths with no Car's , holiday's ( only 9 days paid ) , no benefits , no central heating, not electricity in every room ,no phone, no hot water, no travel, no inside toilets ,no sick pay , you talk about stupid people, looked in a mirror lately ?
Yes housing was more affordable , but they had interest rates of up to 15% try the young of today with that !
Of course over 65 care about the future they have Children and grand children and want the best for them , they believe leaving the EU is the best for them , they see the damaged that Mass immigration has done to housing etc , they were/are doing manual type jobs have felt the impact more , cutting their earning power over the last 25 years ,
Where maybe at 21 you don't care were the power lies Brussels not Westminster but I think as you get older you will , The over 65s do not understand why a trading block will want a Army ? , they don't want to be run by a guy who is so drunk most of the time he cannot even put on matching shoes and thjere is no way of removing him , no they care!! they they care a great deal , but most are not fooled by the men in suites
Stop and ask yourself what has Kinnock done for the uk to warrant a £1.4 million pension , £96,000 for his wife now his son is a EU MP , stop believing the men in suites the Blair's, Majors , Browns , Gleggs , Camorons they are only looking after themselves , they have their noses in the trough,
Start thinking for yourself
My dad had a saying...... don't believe what you read and only half of what you see
Our American friends on here trade with the rest of the world, they would not give up there independence, have their laws made elsewhere , be told what to do , why should we ?
 
Last edited:
Mr Trick
Mr Trick
That's way over the top. Please be respectful.
My god what a horrid little FASCIST are you , over 65 don't count , what next put the coloured people back picking cotton, and of course the Jewish problem....
Wow two of you in one thread. A truly horrifying example of how the media is affecting people in this country.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom