Spike's attempted rape

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hello everyone,

I'm a big fan of the show and have been browsing the forums for a while now. Thought it was about time to join in with some of the discussions.

This scene seems to be one of the most frequently talked about on the forums I've looked at. It regularly features in the most disliked / things that should have been changed sort of threads. I'm hoping someone will be able to explain to me why this is the case.

From reading this thread and other's there seems to be 3 idea's that I don't really follow:

1. The writers shouldn't have touched this subject:

I don't understand the idea that this should be some how off limits in the Buffyverse. We see a massive range of issues tackled across Buffy and Angel up to and including murder. I'm not sure why this should be left alone.

2. It's the worst thing Spike has done / could do:

Spike has been a souless vampire for 100+ years. We've seen him kill 2 slayers and countless others on the show. Added to everything he must have done that we haven't seen and I'd be surprised if this gets near the list of the worst things Spike has done.

3. It's the worst thing Buffy has been through:

On the show we have seen Buffy be killed, sacrifice herself, send Angel to hell and lose her mother. As well as suffer through countless attempts on her life and the lives of her friends.

So my question is, why is this scence treated so differently from the countless other dark moments in the show?
 
Gum Gnome33
Gum Gnome33
I agree that there are so many troubling aspects of the show (specifically murder) that are not properly addressed
[MENTION=12470]The Bronze[/MENTION]
Hello everyone

Hello.

So my question is, why is this scence treated so differently from the countless other dark moments in the show?

I don't believe it is. Buffy's suicide in "The Gift", Buffy attempting to murder Faith, activation of the potentials and Buffy's plan in "Chosen", Willow brainwashing Tara and other scenes spawned far bigger discussions than this one.

I'm not sure why this should be left alone.

The subject is not an issue. It's not the first rape attempt ( that takes place in the 6th episode ) it's not even the first rape. It's the execution that's the problem. The scene doesn't make sense because of the following reasons:
1. Buffy is the slayer. Spike is incapable of physically overpowering her. It's impossible.
2. Willow and Tara are in the house. The only thing that protects Spike from being eviscerated by two pissed off witches is bloody plot armour.

To add an insult to injury, Buffy's trauma is never mentioned, even though she will not go to bed with anybody for the next 3 years. We have a rape attempt followed by 3 years without any sex or intimacy whatsoever and this is never addressed. It's just garbage.
 
Black Eye Guy
Black Eye Guy
[No message]
Kean
Kean
100%
Lyri
Lyri
[No message]
R
Robb Stark
[No message]
1. The writers shouldn't have touched this subject:

I don't understand the idea that this should be some how off limits in the Buffyverse. We see a massive range of issues tackled across Buffy and Angel up to and including murder. I'm not sure why this should be left alone./QUOTE]

Well I think there's three answers to that depending on who's answering, I've seen people say that because they didn't want to see Spike put through it and have it be part of his character. Theres people who just dont want it in the show, and my own opinion, that I dont have a problem with the story, but it wasn't properly handled.
2. It's the worst thing Spike has done / could do:

Spike has been a souless vampire for 100+ years. We've seen him kill 2 slayers and countless others on the show. Added to everything he must have done that we haven't seen and I'd be surprised if this gets near the list of the worst things Spike has done.

3. It's the worst thing Buffy has been through:

On the show we have seen Buffy be killed, sacrifice herself, send Angel to hell and lose her mother. As well as suffer through countless attempts on her life and the lives of her friends.

Well I think this is just opinion, I think a lot of people would see attempted/rape as a worse crime then murder because of how traumatizing it can be, something that was ignored on the show.
 
Hello everyone,


1. The writers shouldn't have touched this subject:

I don't understand the idea that this should be some how off limits in the Buffyverse. We see a massive range of issues tackled across Buffy and Angel up to and including murder. I'm not sure why this should be left alone.

No, it's not that I think it should never have been addressed, it's not that I think rape shouldn't have been 'touched on' in this show - it's that I do not agree with how it WAS 'touched on'. Everything from the attempted rapist's perspective? How HE feels? How it affected HIM? Hoe much it changed HIM? Where is Buffy in all of this? HER feelings are what should be important here and it's never EVER addressed. It's a joke.

2. It's the worst thing Spike has done / could do:

Spike has been a souless vampire for 100+ years. We've seen him kill 2 slayers and countless others on the show. Added to everything he must have done that we haven't seen and I'd be surprised if this gets near the list of the worst things Spike has done.



3. It's the worst thing Buffy has been through:

On the show we have seen Buffy be killed, sacrifice herself, send Angel to hell and lose her mother. As well as suffer through countless attempts on her life and the lives of her friends.

To most people - myself included - rape is the most violent, invasive, damaging, soul destroying thing that could happen to a person, and I'm not just talking about women here, men get raped, too. This is someone FORCING themselves inside you, someone taking away your agency and turning you into a THING for them to use and discarding you afterwards. I really don't give a damn about Spike's so-called agenda here - he was attempting to take away Buffy's agency, he didn't care what she was telling him, he wanted what he wanted and he was going to get it whether she liked it or not.

It is absolutely the worst thing Buffy has EVER been through. This was someone she thought she could trust, someone who had been by her side and fought with her, saved the world with her, looked after her sister, her mother, protected her friends, and he was trying to force himself on her in the most vile way possible, regardless of the fact that she was saying 'no', that she was screaming, crying, BEGGING him to get off of her and didn't stop until she literally gathered all the strength she could find and kicked him across the room. Only then did Spike stop. Because she made him.

So my question is, why is this scence treated so differently from the countless other dark moments in the show?

Because it's so far beyond any of those other 'dark moments' that it isn't even in the same league. And [MENTION=11194]EVIL UU[/MENTION] is right - it's hardly the only scene that has spawned this kind of discussion, it's just that there are SO many fans on either side.

And it's not often that I agree with [MENTION=11194]EVIL UU[/MENTION] - in fact, I don't think I've EVER agreed with them - but they hit the nail on the head here:

To add an insult to injury, Buffy's trauma is never mentioned, even though she will not go to bed with anybody for the next 3 years. We have a rape attempt followed by 3 years without any sex or intimacy whatsoever and this is never addressed. It's just garbage.

Buffy's reaction to the AR is never, ever addressed from her POV, it's forgotten about in favor of Spike's reaction to getting a soul. That is NOT okay. It's pretty much the worst thing this show and these writers have ever done.
 
Thank you for all the replies, I think I'm getting a better understanding on the issues people have with this.

@EVIL UU

I don't believe it is. Buffy's suicide in "The Gift", Buffy attempting to murder Faith, activation of the potentials and Buffy's plan in "Chosen", Willow brainwashing Tara and other scenes spawned far bigger discussions than this one.

Fair enough, this just seemed the most talked about / disliked to me when looking through. I'm glad it's not an isolated thing.

The subject is not an issue. It's not the first rape attempt ( that takes place in the 6th episode ) it's not even the first rape. It's the execution that's the problem.

Is this Xander / Buffy in the pack? Because I see this as a comparable incident that doesn't seem to generate the same discussion and bad feeling. Xander while possessed attempts to force himself onto Buffy. Buffy fights him off. When Xander returns to normal Buffy doesn't hold it against him and you also don't see her dealing with any feelings about it afterwards. Now admittedly there's isn't much focus on the affects on Xander like we get with Spike but it seems Buffy not talking about either incident is quite consistent and maybe just how she copes with / handles the situation.

The scene doesn't make sense because of the following reasons:
1. Buffy is the slayer. Spike is incapable of physically overpowering her. It's impossible.

I haven't seen the episode in a little while but as far as I recall she does overpower him eventually which is why it ends where it does. Also don't we see throughout the show that Buffy can be overpowered at various times? No doubt a fully on her game Buffy is far too much for Spike in a straight fight but isn't she off guard and distracted at the start of the scene?

2. Willow and Tara are in the house. The only thing that protects Spike from being eviscerated by two pissed off witches is bloody plot armour.

Now again I'll take your word on this because it's out of my memory. So I mean this shows Spike is doing something awful and not in any way thinking about the consequences to him or anyone else. That seems plausible to me. Also I'm not sure if it's plot armour. Agreed if Buffy shouts for help and reveals all straight away then that's it for Spike. I'm just not convinced that Buffy dealing with it herself and not going straight for help is implausible. Don't all victims react differently, for every person who'd shout isn't there another who wouldn't?

To add an insult to injury, Buffy's trauma is never mentioned, even though she will not go to bed with anybody for the next 3 years. We have a rape attempt followed by 3 years without any sex or intimacy whatsoever and this is never addressed. It's just garbage.

Now this seems to be the main problem I'm seeing that everyone has and I totally understand this now. Just to take what you're saying though, could there be a way of looking at those 3 years without sex and intimacy as her reaction to what's happened? We don't see her talking about it but do we not see an effect on her anyway?

@Black Eye Guy

Well I think there's three answers to that depending on who's answering, I've seen people say that because they didn't want to see Spike put through it and have it be part of his character. Theres people who just dont want it in the show, and my own opinion, that I dont have a problem with the story, but it wasn't properly handled.

Interesting ways of looking at it. I don't really understand the first 2 options but certainly see where everyone is coming from with the handling. I mean as part of Spike's character, he's a vampire, he has been killing and most likely raping since being turned. Same sort of thing for not wanting it in the show. Like Evil UU says it's already in the show.

@Black Eye Guy & @Lyri

Well I think this is just opinion, I think a lot of people would see attempted/rape as a worse crime then murder because of how traumatizing it can be, something that was ignored on the show.

To most people - myself included - rape is the most violent, invasive, damaging, soul destroying thing that could happen to a person, and I'm not just talking about women here, men get raped, too. This is someone FORCING themselves inside you, someone taking away your agency and turning you into a THING for them to use and discarding you afterwards. I really don't give a damn about Spike's so-called agenda here - he was attempting to take away Buffy's agency, he didn't care what she was telling him, he wanted what he wanted and he was going to get it whether she liked it or not.

It is absolutely the worst thing Buffy has EVER been through. This was someone she thought she could trust, someone who had been by her side and fought with her, saved the world with her, looked after her sister, her mother, protected her friends, and he was trying to force himself on her in the most vile way possible, regardless of the fact that she was saying 'no', that she was screaming, crying, BEGGING him to get off of her and didn't stop until she literally gathered all the strength she could find and kicked him across the room. Only then did Spike stop. Because she made him.

I think maybe this is where I'm struggling and just have a different opinion to others. I'm in full agreement about how bad and damaging rape can be, to men and women as you say. Everything you both say is obviously true and makes complete sense. My issue I guess is by saying that it is the worst thing and worse than murder. A rape victim is at the end of the ordeal still alive, they still have a chance. I appreciate the huge damage caused and that some will never be able to come to terms with it but there are also a whole lot of survivors out there who go on to have happy lives. For a murder victim that is it. No more chances for happiness or anything else. I feel by saying rape is a greater crime than murder it implies that rape victims are in a worse situation than being dead, devaluing their life somewhat and that makes me uncomfortable. Also if this were how the crimes were seen in law then it would suggest that once a rape has happened the attacker would face no greater consequences if they then murdered the victim, again I'm not comfortable with this.

Buffy's reaction to the AR is never, ever addressed from her POV, it's forgotten about in favor of Spike's reaction to getting a soul. That is NOT okay. It's pretty much the worst thing this show and these writers have ever done.

Again this seems to be the main issue and I completely understand now why you and others feel the issue was handled poorly. I'm doing a rewatch and will have to pay attention to the episodes after this happens and get a fresher perspective. All I'd say is that perhaps being quiet and not close to anyone afterwards is Buffy's reaction and way of dealing with it, even if it's not a particularly healthy approach. I imagine everyone would react differently.
 
[MENTION=12470]The Bronze[/MENTION],

Is this Xander / Buffy in the pack? Because I see this as a comparable incident that doesn't seem to generate the same discussion and bad feeling. Xander while possessed attempts to force himself onto Buffy. Buffy fights him off. When Xander returns to normal Buffy doesn't hold it against him and you also don't see her dealing with any feelings about it afterwards. Now admittedly there's isn't much focus on the affects on Xander like we get with Spike but it seems Buffy not talking about either incident is quite consistent and maybe just how she copes with / handles the situation.

This is a fair point. I suppose the difference is that Xander was clearly possessed by an outside force and it wasn't "him". His emotions and actions were being messed with. With Spike, he'd fought with and proclaimed his love for Buffy endlessly for years. It's a far, FAR greater and deeper betrayal. The difference is that there are many fans who idealize every good thing Spike did without a soul, regardless of his motivation, and then whitewash the bad.

Now, for me, I don't hold Spike responsible for trying to rape Buffy, or at least, I don't hold Spike-with-a-soul responsible. Just as I don't hold Angel accountable for the actions of Angelus. That's really the only way I can do it. For the most part, I find Spike, with or without a soul, very entertaining (and indeed, he's one of my favorite characters). However, at the same time I fully recognize that without a soul, he is a monster. A funny one perhaps, but a monster all the same. He's not some magical knight in shining armor without a soul.

And as a side note, [MENTION=2773]Eve[/MENTION]ryone, let's please not get into a which-is-worse debate. That will only lead to angry words and hurt feelings. This has been an excellent, thought-provoking thread. Let's not derail it.
 
Last edited:
Gum Gnome33
Gum Gnome33
yes thank you. the which-is-worse is giving me goosebumps for sure...
Spike's lack of character development was intentional. Sure the circumstances surrounding his character changed but he was always obsessive and selfish in every choice that he made. The final scene down in that cave was Spike finally realizing that Buffy didn't really love him and he could finally accept that. Before the soul he could never accept or move on from anything until he had something else to obsess over. (His switch from Drusilla to Buffy.)

In some ways I think they gave Spike a fitting end during the finale of season 7. But I do find Spike humorous and I'm hoping that one day he gets a good arc.
 
Black Eye Guy
Black Eye Guy
[No message]
@Robb Stark

And as a side note, @Everyone, let's please not get into a which-is-worse debate. That will only lead to angry words and hurt feelings. This has been an excellent, thought-provoking thread. Let's not derail it.

Duly noted. I certainly didn't sign up to upset anyone so I'll leave that subject alone.

Now, for me, I don't hold Spike responsible for trying to rape Buffy, or at least, I don't hold Spike-with-a-soul responsible. Just as I don't hold Angel accountable for the actions of Angelus. That's really the only way I can do it. For the most part, I find Spike, with or without a soul, very entertaining (and indeed, he's one of my favorite characters). However, at the same time I fully recognize that without a soul, he is a monster. A funny one perhaps, but a monster all the same. He's not some magical knight in shining armor without a soul.

I'm in full agreement here. Spike is right up there as one of my favourite characters. I find him thoroughly entertaining all the way through the show. But like you say without a soul he's an entertaining monster. Also I don't hold Angel or Spike accountable for the actions of Angel-us Spike-us. I think maybe Spike gets a harder time of it because his character traits seem similar in him with or without a soul. I've always thought there could be a case of not having seen much of souled Spike to establish his character on the show. When Angelus is first turned to Angel his initial reaction is to attempt to carry on as before. He's had decades to come fully into his new situation as opposed to Spikes couple of months/years.


This is a fair point. I suppose the difference is that Xander was clearly possessed by an outside force and it wasn't "him". His emotions and actions were being messed with. With Spike, he'd fought with and proclaimed his love for Buffy endlessly for years. It's a far, FAR greater and deeper betrayal. The difference is that there are many fans who idealize every good thing Spike did without a soul, regardless of his motivation, and then whitewash the bad.

Hmmm I guess the betrayal is deeper as Buffy is attached to soulless Spike and for whatever reason expects better from him. It makes sense to me that Buffy is quick to forgive if it's not someone's fault.
- Xander/Hyena - She has no connection here and this is clearly what attacks her
- Xander - Best friend and has her trust. No reason to hold him responsible for things outside of his control. She just has to come to terms with seeing the image of her attacker shared by her friend
- Angelus - Again no connection here. Angelus attacks her and everyone else in sight
- Angel - As with Xander, her task is to accept the same appearance is shared by her attacker and lover
- Spike-us - She had a bond with Spike without a soul. Hard to define but she had a connection and level of trust. This trust was broken and I believe had Spike returned without a soul she wouldn't have moved on or carried on as before
- Spike - So when it comes to Spike with a soul I believe that Buffy is capable accepting the face of her attacker on this new person/vampire in her life. She's accepted this twice previously as above.

I think what I'm getting at is perhaps a bigger reaction to the attempted rape scene would have been played out on the show if a soulless Spike ever returned. You'd have seen Buffy have to confront Spike-us who she trusted and who did that to her. When Spike returns with a soul I think this effects the reaction that we see since the actual attacker in her mind never returns
 
[MENTION=12470]The Bronze[/MENTION]
Is this Xander / Buffy in the pack? Because I see this as a comparable incident that doesn't seem to generate the same discussion and bad feeling. Xander while possessed attempts to force himself onto Buffy. Buffy fights him off. When Xander returns to normal Buffy doesn't hold it against him and you also don't see her dealing with any feelings about it afterwards.

That's because Buffy's doesn't see Xander in "The Pack" as Xander. She's aware that he's possessed from the get-go. There's no trust to violate here, it's just business as usual except the baddie is Xander-shaped and slaying's not an option.

Buffy not talking about either incident is quite consistent and maybe just how she copes with / handles the situation.

I don't think those situations are comparable enough. Look at how different Buffy's reactions are in the He tried. He didn't... and No, but it's safe to say that in his animal state his idea of wooing doesn't involve a Yanni CD and a bottle of Chianti scenes. In "Seeing Red" Buffy's traumatized, in "The Pack" she's making a joke. There's no trauma to cope with in the latter, no situation to handle.

Also don't we see throughout the show that Buffy can be overpowered at various times?

Not by a vampire. OK, it happens once in the entire show, in "Killed by Death" and Buffy passes out a minute later because of the illness. That's the only instance of vampire overpowering her. Also, her wounds, injuries, bruises and so on have no effect on her performance. She slays just fine in "Chosen" after receiving a blade through the guts.

Agreed if Buffy shouts for help and reveals all straight away then that's it for Spike. I'm just not convinced that Buffy dealing with it herself and not going straight for help is implausible.

They are loud enough to alarm the entire house, plus, there's also magic.

Just to take what you're saying though, could there be a way of looking at those 3 years without sex and intimacy as her reaction to what's happened?

I think that is her reaction but it's just mine interpretation. There's nothing solid enough and this is not something I should be masturbating out just because the franchise doesn't deliver. On one hand the attempted rape is never mentioned but on the other hand Buffy doesn't make love with anybody for 3 years and when Satsu falls for her she doesn't even look for a lover, she's a big, hideous, dateless monster. Alright, she's busy but she's always busy.
 
I've spent the last two days re-watching "Seeing Red" and everything concerning it through the end of Season 6 plus most of Season 7, since it's been a while since I have done so, and I wanted to be sure that I haven't been giving who is, admittedly, my favorite character on the show more credit than he actually deserved. With the episodes once more fresh in my mind, I have to admit that I still stand by what I have said, both here and in other places about Spike, "Seeing Red," and its aftermath. I see a man who made a mistake and did everything in his power to learn from that mistake and use the experience to become a better man. That's it, folks, that's just the way that I see it, and pretending that I don't simply wouldn't be honest.

ON THE OTHER HAND...

If I mentally substitute Angelus for Spike in that bathroom, I fully agree that Buffy could have staked him right on the spot, and while I probably wouldn't have stood up and cheered, I wouldn't have been very upset, either, so I'm obviously not as impartial as I previously thought that I was.

I still believe that Spike with a soul should not be held responsible for what his presoul counterpart did, other than that one single moment when he came to the actual realization that he had done something so terrible that he had to do something extreme in order to in some way atone for his actions. Not in my wildest fantasy could I ever imagine Angelus doing that. That's a point that I simply can not force myself to ignore, even though I freely admit that my Spike colored glasses affect my judgement in that.
 
I've spent the last two days re-watching "Seeing Red" and everything concerning it through the end of Season 6 plus most of Season 7, since it's been a while since I have done so, and I wanted to be sure that I haven't been giving who is, admittedly, my favorite character on the show more credit than he actually deserved. With the episodes once more fresh in my mind, I have to admit that I still stand by what I have said, both here and in other places about Spike, "Seeing Red," and its aftermath. I see a man who made a mistake and did everything in his power to learn from that mistake and use the experience to become a better man. That's it, folks, that's just the way that I see it, and pretending that I don't simply wouldn't be honest.

ON THE OTHER HAND...

If I mentally substitute Angelus for Spike in that bathroom, I fully agree that Buffy could have staked him right on the spot, and while I probably wouldn't have stood up and cheered, I wouldn't have been very upset, either, so I'm obviously not as impartial as I previously thought that I was.

I still believe that Spike with a soul should not be held responsible for what his presoul counterpart did, other than that one single moment when he came to the actual realization that he had done something so terrible that he had to do something extreme in order to in some way atone for his actions. Not in my wildest fantasy could I ever imagine Angelus doing that. That's a point that I simply can not force myself to ignore, even though I freely admit that my Spike colored glasses affect my judgement in that.

Fair enough. We all have characters we can turn a blind eye towards once in a while 🙄.

I suppose, like so many things I disliked about S6 and S7, it was another huge writing error for me. I could almost buy your explanation if it wasn't for Spike's final scenes that season. I know Joss decided he was smarter than everyone (and his interviews about said scene are just crap. "I personally invented something called...a plot twist". Give me a break. Talk about arrogant) and wanted a big ol' misdirect, but he obviously didn't stop and think. He was so wrapped up in fooling the fans that he didn't think about what he was making Spike say. And regardless of intent, he still said it; it counts in the story. Grr...argh.
 
Fair enough. We all have characters we can turn a blind eye towards once in a while 🙄.

I suppose, like so many things I disliked about S6 and S7, it was another huge writing error for me. I could almost buy your explanation if it wasn't for Spike's final scenes that season. I know Joss decided he was smarter than everyone (and his interviews about said scene are just crap. "I personally invented something called...a plot twist". Give me a break. Talk about arrogant) and wanted a big ol' misdirect, but he obviously didn't stop and think. He was so wrapped up in fooling the fans that he didn't think about what he was making Spike say. And regardless of intent, he still said it; it counts in the story. Grr...argh.

But this isn't true, what does Spike actually say that isn't true? The words were written with a double meaning, that doesn't mean theire complete crap, it means they have two ways of being looked at. You can look at it with the plot twist and it hints it's leading there, but the words still make sense for what he's doing. Getting a soul to prove Buffy loves him - that wasn't bad writing, that is what he was doing, and that is carried into season 7 and further explained by him in Beneath You.
 
R
Robb Stark
That's why I said "almost" :)
If I mentally substitute Angelus for Spike in that bathroom, I fully agree that Buffy could have staked him right on the spot, and while I probably wouldn't have stood up and cheered, I wouldn't have been very upset, either, so I'm obviously not as impartial as I previously thought that I was.

Wait a minute, are to 'mentally substituting' Angelus for Spike for the WHOLE of Spike's arc when you make this statement, or just that one scene?

If you switch Spike out for Angelus, then you have to switch them for the WHOLE of Spike's story - from chip until that bathroom - otherwise it's just not a fair comparison. And if you ARE switching them out for the whole arc, then don't you think your statement is more than just a little bit biased? I mean, you say that Spike was growing as a person and that the AR was what he needed to push himself over the edge and realize he wanted his soul back - Angelus would have been in the same position. He would have gone through everything that Spike had gone through, grown like Spike, fallen in love with Buffy like Spike, helped save the world like Spike, EVERYTHING.

So please, tell me, why do you think Spike should be spared, yet you willingly admit you would have condemned Angelus in the same situation?

Me, I don't care who was in that bathroom, it could have been Andrew for all I care. I still think the fact that the AR was NEVER spoken about again to be horrendous storytelling.

[MENTION=11194]EVIL UU[/MENTION] and their fanwanked theory makes sense - but it's just that, fanwank, something that we as fans have had to come up with ourselves because we have no other information to go on. And that's just not right. No woman is ever able to forget a rape, they can move on, yes, but it'll always still be there, especially when the man who wears her would-be raper's face is such a huge part of her life.
 
white avenger
white avenger
That's it exactly. I AM biased, and I can't see Spike in any other way. And, I can't see Angelus being able to evolve into a hero the way that Spike did, no way, no how.
[MENTION=12470]The Bronze[/MENTION]

I think everyone has done a really good job of explaining why this scene is so problematic but I'll throw in my two cents while I'm here. When a show takes on the issue of rape there is an immense pressure and need for them to handle the issue responsibly. Traditionally that hasn't been the case on tv and film. On a show like Buffy I feel that responsibility is doubled because of the demographic of the audiences, which was largely young women. For a great deal of us Buffy had already seen us through adolescence, heart break, divorce, college, friendships, death and the responsibilities of adult life. So, when Spike tries to rape Buffy and we never see what it did to her, that's a huge problem. We never hear her speak on it, by the start of S7 it's like it didn't even happen. The story has stayed with Spike and what it did to him, how it changed him. At this point the show is no longer telling a story about rape, but instead the story itself has contributed to rape culture. Buffy went from a show created to empower women to one that dis-empowered them.
 
Lyri
Lyri
[No message]
R
Robb Stark
[No message]
thetopher
thetopher
[No message]
Wait a minute, are to 'mentally substituting' Angelus for Spike for the WHOLE of Spike's arc when you make this statement, or just that one scene?

What I was trying to say was that my feelings for the character of Spike make it very difficult to be totally objective here. I simply can not see that much bad in him at that point. If I substitute Angelus, or any other vampire without a soul, I can much more easily see the "wrongness" of it.

Just like a mutual friend of ours can't see anything good in Spike, no matter what he does, I can't imagine him doing anything so bad that I can't forgive him. Unless maybe he became a Democrat. Some things just can't be excused.
 
Just like a mutual friend of ours can't see anything good in Spike, no matter what he does, I can't imagine him doing anything so bad that I can't forgive him. Unless maybe he became a Democrat. Some things just can't be excused.


Why are you bringing [MENTION=7585]Kean[/MENTION] into this? In the past, Kean HAS admitted that Spike has done SOME good things - for example, she readily admits, more than once, that Spike was completely selfless and heroic in 'Chosen'. She hasn't said that he's a good person, but SHE'S a big enough person to admit that Spike can and has done some good deeds and that Angel can and has done some terrible things. She's not as tunnel-visioned as you're making her out to be here.
 
Why are you bringing [MENTION=7585]Kean[/MENTION] into this?

Actually, I was bringing the Democrats into it more than Miss K.

My point, as I have said several times now, is that I am admitting my blind spot when it comes to Spike and anything that he does. I have spent so many years defending him and championing his cause that I am incapable of doing anything else now.
 
Actually, I was bringing the Democrats into it more than Miss K.

My point, as I have said several times now, is that I am admitting my blind spot when it comes to Spike and anything that he does. I have spent so many years defending him and championing his cause that I am incapable of doing anything else now.

So basically... we win.

I mentioned at the start of the tread that I could accept a case for Spike becoming noble from season 7 on, and I have seen Kean and others say similar things. I still think Spikes story/character is boring in season 7, but it's not bias that determines that.

It's nice to actually see you admit that your rational for the character is bias and blind spots, and not actual evidence from the show!

You've finally taken your first step to recovery, I'll start working on an Angel banner for you now! There's hope yet!
 
Lyri
Lyri
[No message]
Kean
Kean
I'm going to need "So basically... we win." added to the quotes. :lmao:
thetopher
thetopher
[No message]
It's nice to actually see you admit that your rational for the character is bias and blind spots, and not actual evidence from the show!

You've finally taken your first step to recovery, I'll start working on an Angel banner for you now! There's hope yet!

Now if we could just get some of the other folks around here to own up to their own blind spots and shortcomings, wouldn't this be a wonderful place? And incidentally, I prefer to look at my unceasing support of Spike the same way that Faith described Angel as being the one who never gave up on her. Ultimately, Angel, in that case, anyhow, was right, just as I'm sure that I am too.

And as for winning anything, I haven't admitted that there is anything actually wrong with Spike, only that I can't see it.
 
And as for winning anything, I haven't admitted that there is anything actually wrong with Spike, only that I can't see it.

Well by admitting there is a blind spot, there has to be something you can't see, or else you'd have just kept saying you were right!

But dont digress, this was was a big step for you. Take you time, relish in being on a right side, it's wonderful over here.

Think we might have to start back up Save Our Spuffies, since we've now done more good then Adopt a Bangel!

😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom