There should be a law...

There should be a law against bullying in schools, if it were a police issue (which it should be) then it would happen less. I'm sorry but you shouldn't just be put into detention or expelled or whatever for mentally scarring or physically harming a person. The police should deal with you.
 
Priceless
Priceless
There are laws in the UK if you are being bullied for a protected characteristic (except sex, because if misogyny were a crime the prisons would be full lol)
There should be a law against bullying in schools, if it were a police issue (which it should be) then it would happen less. I'm sorry but you shouldn't just be put into detention or expelled or whatever for mentally scarring or physically harming a person. The police should deal with you.

Whilst I completely agree in principle, in reality it would be incredibly difficult for several reasons:

1. In most cases, it's just one person's word against another and unless there is physical marks, then it would be difficult to prove because the bully is going to deny it.
2. If the bully is operating as part of a gang, then they are going to use their friends to back up their story so you have several accounts saying one thing, and one account saying another.
3. Some bullies like to make out they're the victim and would likely use the police threat against their victim.

Bullies are cowards who pick on those they perceive to be weaker than them so a police threat could make them double down on their efforts to keep their victim quiet.


There should be a law against smoking in public places which includes outside areas and apartment corridors. It stinks and, particularly if you're a non-smoker, why should you have to breath in the smoke and smell the stench of somebody else's cigarette. Instead they should make tobacco injectable, that way if someone is that desperate for a cigarette, they can stab themselves in the arm. They can poison their own bodies without inflicting it on other people. Alternatively, they should just ban smoking altogether. (Apologies to anybody reading this who smokes, I just hate the habit. It's the smell, if it didn't have the smell it wouldn't seem so bad.)
 
1. In most cases, it's just one person's word against another and unless there is physical marks, then it would be difficult to prove because the bully is going to deny it.
2. If the bully is operating as part of a gang, then they are going to use their friends to back up their story so you have several accounts saying one thing, and one account saying another.
3. Some bullies like to make out they're the victim and would likely use the police threat against their victim.
That's definitely true for some occasions but I know of countless times where it's pretty much the opposite. Outright abuse often happens in front of teachers and a classroom of like 30 students. Nobody says or does anything (even the person being bullied) because they know it will likely achieve nothing because there's not adequate punishment for that sort of thing. That's why there's a perception of bullies being powerful and connected it's because there's nothing to protect the person being bullied. It's really odd to think about because school is surely supposed to prepare you for the adult world but if you were to be pushed around at work or in the street that's not shrugged off like it is if you're someone in school. It's probably not legally punished much because the offenders are under age but that should be reformed imo.
 
Weather people should have their salary attached to how well they do the weather The more they mess up thee more money taken away from
their paycheck 😀
 
*Educators will not be allowed to say one thing and then do the opposite, they have to follow through with what they said in order to be taken seriously.

* Parking lots will be built every 1-2 km.
 
Weather people should have their salary attached to how well they do the weather The more they mess up thee more money taken away from
their paycheck 😀
Can't agree with that one, if someone is new to the job and living paycheck to paycheck and mess up accidentally?
Sure if they've been at the job years and are still messing up, then yeah I can see that.
 
ChaseRules
ChaseRules
That what I meant . Thanks .
Can't agree with that one, if someone is new to the job and living paycheck to paycheck and mess up accidentally?
Sure if they've been at the job years and are still messing up, then yeah I can see that.
But no one messes up on purpose. I am sure everyone messes up accidentally. And what if they are new and not living paycheck to paycheck, would it be okay to dock their wages then? Of what if they've been there for years and accidentally make a mistake, but they are living paycheck to paycheck, should they not be docked then?

You can't have a sliding scale that seperates, and treats, some employees different than the other. Then the people that don't live paycheck to paycheck would feel victimized by having money. Moreover, how does the employer know that you are living paycheck to paycheck? I don't want them knowing my finances.
 
nightshade
nightshade
They were under stress and were trying not to mess up, but got scared of messing up, causing them to mess up
But no one messes up on purpose. I am sure everyone messes up accidentally. And what if they are new and not living paycheck to paycheck, would it be okay to dock their wages then? Of what if they've been there for years and accidentally make a mistake, but they are living paycheck to paycheck, should they not be docked then?

You can't have a sliding scale that seperates, and treats, some employees different than the other. Then the people that don't live paycheck to paycheck would feel victimized by having money. Moreover, how does the employer know that you are living paycheck to paycheck? I don't want them knowing my finances.
Stop using logic . You running my rant by using logic instead of agreeing with me .
 
No more roads. There should be a moratorium on road building for a few years. There will soon be no green spaces left and although I (vaguely) understand the need for houses, we shouldn't need more roads.
 
I'm ok with no more roads, as long as the current ones are properly maintained, which they currently aren't.
 
I'm ok with no more roads, as long as the current ones are properly maintained, which they currently aren't.
Which is confusing since we not spending all the time we could do fixing the old roads but making news ones .
 
Weather people should have their salary attached to how well they do the weather The more they mess up thee more money taken away from
their paycheck 😀
"Once calculated by hand based mainly upon changes in barometric pressure, current weather conditions, and sky condition or cloud cover, weather forecasting now relies on computer-based models that take many atmospheric factors into account.[1] Human input is still required to pick the best possible forecast model to base the forecast upon, which involves pattern recognition skills, teleconnections, knowledge of model performance, and knowledge of model biases. The inaccuracy of forecasting is due to the chaotic nature of the atmosphere, the massive computational power required to solve the equations that describe the atmosphere, the error involved in measuring the initial conditions, and an incomplete understanding of atmospheric processes. Hence, forecasts become less accurate as the difference between current time and the time for which the forecast is being made (the range of the forecast) increases. The use of ensembles and model consensus help narrow the error and pick the most likely outcome".

Blame God. 😊

No more roads. There should be a moratorium on road building for a few years. There will soon be no green spaces left and although I (vaguely) understand the need for houses, we shouldn't need more roads.

But don't new houses require an infrastructure that includes new roads? It's no good building houses unless people can get to their place of employment. New houses put more pressure on existing roads. We probably need a more reliable and more extensive Public Transport System (though if this is right

More than 11,000 homes in England to be built on land at high risk of flooding

better make it canals). 😉

"More than half of the UK land area is farmland (fields, orchards etc), just over a third might be termed natural or semi-natural (moors, heathland, natural grassland etc), a little under 6% is built on (roads, buildings, airports, quarries etc) and 2.5% is green urban (parks, gardens, golf courses, sports pitches etc). BBC 9 Nov 2017" Though there is a disparity between England and the other countries in the UK. Blame Sturgeon 'cos Scotland's got too many mountains. 😊

_98667309_land_use_chart_640_v1-nc.png
 
Bluebird
Bluebird
Wow that ratio difference in Scotland
I thought we were meant to be going greener, less cars, more buses and bikes and feet. Fix the roads we have. Fix the derelict houses we already have. Support from central govt for local councils to buy houses to rent, and maybe we won't need to build so much.
 
That politicians be sent to prison when they tell a lie to any of the populace of their country.
In Australia $10 million has been spent on a swimming pool in north Sydney when the money was meant to be for regional Australia, and politicians defended the decision.

That American president has accused the worlds media of ramping up the effect of the corona virus worldwide to muck up the financial institutions. Which is a joke as when, not if America is hit by the corona virus what levels will the virus reach.
 
Last edited:
@Bluebird "Wow that ratio difference in Scotland". Impressive isn't it? 🙂 I'm sure Boris has an unused bulldozer if you want to flatten a few mountains. Alternatively, get Nicola to smile and ask nicely and he'll build you a bridge (or have a very expensive public consultation and NOT build a bridge). 🙄
 
@Bluebird "Wow that ratio difference in Scotland". Impressive isn't it? 🙂 I'm sure Boris has an unused bulldozer if you want to flatten a few mountains. Alternatively, get Nicola to smile and ask nicely and he'll build you a bridge (or have a very expensive public consultation and NOT build a bridge). 🙄
It reminds me of visiting my parents' friends when I was wee, who lived near Thurso, and how the drive was an epic adventure because driving through the Highlands is an experience to say the least. Certainly not an easy way around those solid volcanic mountains lol.
 
There should be a law that everyone has to watch Buffy AND Angel. It drives me nuts the people that say they loved Buffy but refuse to watch Angel!

Baileys should always be dunk with ice, NOT served warm.

Baileys should make cake not just at Christmas!
 
Back
Top Bottom